结合病例对照和队列诊断准确性研究的无缝设计。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Eric Bibiza-Freiwald, Werner Vach, Antonia Zapf
{"title":"结合病例对照和队列诊断准确性研究的无缝设计。","authors":"Eric Bibiza-Freiwald, Werner Vach, Antonia Zapf","doi":"10.1002/sim.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In determining the accuracy of a new diagnostic test, often two steps are performed. In the first step, a case-control study is performed as an efficient but potentially biased design. In a second step, a population-based cohort study is performed as an unbiased but less efficient design. In order to accelerate diagnostic research, it has recently been suggested to combine the two designs in one seamless design. In this article, we present a more in-depth description of this idea. The seamless diagnostic accuracy study design is formally introduced by comparison with the traditional pathway, and the basic design decisions are discussed: A stopping rule and a stopping time. An appealing feature of the design is the possibility to ignore the seamless design in the final analysis, although part of the data is used already in an interim analysis. The justification for this strategy is provided by a large-scale simulation study. The simulation study suggests also that the risk of a loss of power due to using a seamless design can be limited by a reasonable choice of the futility boundaries, defining the stopping rule. We conclude that the seamless diagnostic accuracy study design seems to be ready to use. It promises to accelerate diagnostic research, in particular if population-based cohort studies can be started without great efforts and if the reference standard can be evaluated with little delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 6","pages":"e70016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Seamless Design for the Combination of a Case-Control and a Cohort Diagnostic Accuracy Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Bibiza-Freiwald, Werner Vach, Antonia Zapf\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In determining the accuracy of a new diagnostic test, often two steps are performed. In the first step, a case-control study is performed as an efficient but potentially biased design. In a second step, a population-based cohort study is performed as an unbiased but less efficient design. In order to accelerate diagnostic research, it has recently been suggested to combine the two designs in one seamless design. In this article, we present a more in-depth description of this idea. The seamless diagnostic accuracy study design is formally introduced by comparison with the traditional pathway, and the basic design decisions are discussed: A stopping rule and a stopping time. An appealing feature of the design is the possibility to ignore the seamless design in the final analysis, although part of the data is used already in an interim analysis. The justification for this strategy is provided by a large-scale simulation study. The simulation study suggests also that the risk of a loss of power due to using a seamless design can be limited by a reasonable choice of the futility boundaries, defining the stopping rule. We conclude that the seamless diagnostic accuracy study design seems to be ready to use. It promises to accelerate diagnostic research, in particular if population-based cohort studies can be started without great efforts and if the reference standard can be evaluated with little delay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"e70016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在确定新的诊断测试的准确性时,通常要执行两个步骤。在第一步中,病例对照研究作为一种有效但存在潜在偏差的设计进行。在第二步中,以人群为基础的队列研究作为无偏倚但效率较低的设计进行。为了加速诊断研究,最近有人建议将这两种设计结合在一个无缝设计中。在本文中,我们将对这个想法进行更深入的描述。通过与传统路径的比较,正式介绍了无缝诊断准确性研究设计,并讨论了基本设计决策:停止规则和停止时间。该设计的一个吸引人的特点是在最终分析中忽略无缝设计的可能性,尽管部分数据已经在中期分析中使用。一项大规模的模拟研究证明了该策略的合理性。仿真研究还表明,由于使用无缝设计而导致的功率损失风险可以通过合理选择无效边界来限制,并定义停止规则。我们的结论是,无缝诊断准确性研究设计似乎已经准备好使用。它有望加速诊断研究,特别是如果基于人群的队列研究可以不费很大力气就开始,如果参考标准可以毫不拖延地进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Seamless Design for the Combination of a Case-Control and a Cohort Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

In determining the accuracy of a new diagnostic test, often two steps are performed. In the first step, a case-control study is performed as an efficient but potentially biased design. In a second step, a population-based cohort study is performed as an unbiased but less efficient design. In order to accelerate diagnostic research, it has recently been suggested to combine the two designs in one seamless design. In this article, we present a more in-depth description of this idea. The seamless diagnostic accuracy study design is formally introduced by comparison with the traditional pathway, and the basic design decisions are discussed: A stopping rule and a stopping time. An appealing feature of the design is the possibility to ignore the seamless design in the final analysis, although part of the data is used already in an interim analysis. The justification for this strategy is provided by a large-scale simulation study. The simulation study suggests also that the risk of a loss of power due to using a seamless design can be limited by a reasonable choice of the futility boundaries, defining the stopping rule. We conclude that the seamless diagnostic accuracy study design seems to be ready to use. It promises to accelerate diagnostic research, in particular if population-based cohort studies can be started without great efforts and if the reference standard can be evaluated with little delay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信