Anna Maria Johnson, Hei Kit Chan, Renee Johnson, Anastasia S Papin, Daniel C Walter, N Clay Mann, Benjamin Fisher, Larissa Myaskovsky, Ryan M Huebinger
{"title":"院前胸痛和ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者服用阿司匹林的差异","authors":"Anna Maria Johnson, Hei Kit Chan, Renee Johnson, Anastasia S Papin, Daniel C Walter, N Clay Mann, Benjamin Fisher, Larissa Myaskovsky, Ryan M Huebinger","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although disparities exist in aspirin administration for chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), little is known about community-based disparities in aspirin administration for prehospital patients. We evaluated disparities in prehospital aspirin using a national prehospital database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2018-2021 NEMSIS database linked to census data, including adult prehospital encounters. We created two cohorts: dispatch reason of chest pain and identified STEMI on prehospital EKG. We stratified patients based on majority ZIP Code race/ethnicity (>50% White, Black, and Hispanic) and into quartiles based on household income. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between incident community characteristics and aspirin administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4,881,663 chest pain encounters and 184,610 STEMIs. Chest pain encounters in majority White communities (32.3%) received aspirin more often for chest pain than Black (22.1%; aOR 0.59, [0.59-0.60]) or Hispanic (24.8%; aOR 0.66, [0.66-0.67]) communities. Compared to the top income quartile (29.0%), the lowest income quartile had lower odds of aspirin administration (4th-27.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.92-0.94]). For STEMIs, adjusted odds of aspirin administration were higher for White (53.4%) than Black (52.5%; aOR 0.81, [0.78-0.84]) or Hispanic (53.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.89-0.96]) patients. Compared to the highest income quartile (55.0%), lower quartiles had lower odds of aspirin administration (2nd-54.2%; aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97]; 3rd-52.9%; aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96]; 4th-52.0%; aOR 0.86, [0.84-0.89]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients from Black, Hispanic/Latino, and lowest-income communities received aspirin for chest pain at a lower rate than white or high-income patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities of Aspirin Administration for Prehospital Chest Pain and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Maria Johnson, Hei Kit Chan, Renee Johnson, Anastasia S Papin, Daniel C Walter, N Clay Mann, Benjamin Fisher, Larissa Myaskovsky, Ryan M Huebinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although disparities exist in aspirin administration for chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), little is known about community-based disparities in aspirin administration for prehospital patients. We evaluated disparities in prehospital aspirin using a national prehospital database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2018-2021 NEMSIS database linked to census data, including adult prehospital encounters. We created two cohorts: dispatch reason of chest pain and identified STEMI on prehospital EKG. We stratified patients based on majority ZIP Code race/ethnicity (>50% White, Black, and Hispanic) and into quartiles based on household income. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between incident community characteristics and aspirin administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4,881,663 chest pain encounters and 184,610 STEMIs. Chest pain encounters in majority White communities (32.3%) received aspirin more often for chest pain than Black (22.1%; aOR 0.59, [0.59-0.60]) or Hispanic (24.8%; aOR 0.66, [0.66-0.67]) communities. Compared to the top income quartile (29.0%), the lowest income quartile had lower odds of aspirin administration (4th-27.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.92-0.94]). For STEMIs, adjusted odds of aspirin administration were higher for White (53.4%) than Black (52.5%; aOR 0.81, [0.78-0.84]) or Hispanic (53.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.89-0.96]) patients. Compared to the highest income quartile (55.0%), lower quartiles had lower odds of aspirin administration (2nd-54.2%; aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97]; 3rd-52.9%; aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96]; 4th-52.0%; aOR 0.86, [0.84-0.89]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients from Black, Hispanic/Latino, and lowest-income communities received aspirin for chest pain at a lower rate than white or high-income patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities of Aspirin Administration for Prehospital Chest Pain and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.
Objectives: Although disparities exist in aspirin administration for chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), little is known about community-based disparities in aspirin administration for prehospital patients. We evaluated disparities in prehospital aspirin using a national prehospital database.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2018-2021 NEMSIS database linked to census data, including adult prehospital encounters. We created two cohorts: dispatch reason of chest pain and identified STEMI on prehospital EKG. We stratified patients based on majority ZIP Code race/ethnicity (>50% White, Black, and Hispanic) and into quartiles based on household income. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between incident community characteristics and aspirin administration.
Results: We included 4,881,663 chest pain encounters and 184,610 STEMIs. Chest pain encounters in majority White communities (32.3%) received aspirin more often for chest pain than Black (22.1%; aOR 0.59, [0.59-0.60]) or Hispanic (24.8%; aOR 0.66, [0.66-0.67]) communities. Compared to the top income quartile (29.0%), the lowest income quartile had lower odds of aspirin administration (4th-27.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.92-0.94]). For STEMIs, adjusted odds of aspirin administration were higher for White (53.4%) than Black (52.5%; aOR 0.81, [0.78-0.84]) or Hispanic (53.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.89-0.96]) patients. Compared to the highest income quartile (55.0%), lower quartiles had lower odds of aspirin administration (2nd-54.2%; aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97]; 3rd-52.9%; aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96]; 4th-52.0%; aOR 0.86, [0.84-0.89]).
Conclusions: Patients from Black, Hispanic/Latino, and lowest-income communities received aspirin for chest pain at a lower rate than white or high-income patients.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.