IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf019
Robert W Hurley, Khadijah T Bland, Mira D Chaskes, Elaine L Hill, Meredith C B Adams
{"title":"Diagnosis and Coding of Opioid Misuse: A Systematic Scoping Review and Implementation Framework.","authors":"Robert W Hurley, Khadijah T Bland, Mira D Chaskes, Elaine L Hill, Meredith C B Adams","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate current administrative coding practices for opioid misuse within the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD) framework and develop standardized documentation recommendations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Analysis of studies using administrative databases, including electronic health records, insurance claims, and national healthcare utilization databases.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Studies published in peer-reviewed journals examining administrative codes for opioid misuse, excluding those focused solely on illicit drugs, opioid use disorder, or using only natural language processing/qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive search of Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases following PRISMA-S extension guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9,561 initial records, 19 studies met inclusion criteria. The use of ICD-10 code F11.9* (Opioid use) emerged as the most referenced method for documenting opioid misuse, distinguishing it from opioid use disorder methods (F11.1, opioid abuse; F11.2, opioid dependence). Studies demonstrated significant heterogeneity in coding practices, resulting in code-based definitions identifying only approximately 50% of cases compared to more comprehensive clinical assessment approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While ICD-10 code F11.9* can effectively document opioid misuse as distinct from opioid use disorder, successful implementation requires consensus on the clinical definition of opioid misuse and documentation in the form of clear clinical guidelines and operationalized through enhanced electronic health record integration. Future research should focus on validating these approaches across diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估目前在世界卫生组织国际疾病分类(ICD)框架内对阿片类药物滥用的行政编码实践,并制定标准化文档建议:设计:按照 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行系统范围审查:分析使用行政数据库(包括电子健康记录、保险索赔和国家医疗保健使用数据库)进行的研究:在同行评审期刊上发表的、对阿片类药物滥用行政代码进行审查的研究,但不包括仅关注非法药物、阿片类药物使用障碍或仅使用自然语言处理/定性方法的研究:按照 PRISMA-S 扩展指南对 Embase、Medline、Google Scholar 和 PubMed 数据库进行全面检索。三位独立审稿人筛选文章并提取数据。研究质量采用修改后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估:在 9561 条初始记录中,有 19 项研究符合纳入标准。使用ICD-10代码F11.9*(阿片类药物的使用)是记录阿片类药物滥用的最常用方法,有别于阿片类药物使用障碍的方法(F11.1,阿片类药物滥用;F11.2,阿片类药物依赖)。研究表明,编码实践中存在明显的异质性,与更全面的临床评估方法相比,基于编码的定义只能识别约 50%的病例:虽然ICD-10代码F11.9*可以有效地记录阿片类药物滥用(有别于阿片类药物使用障碍),但成功实施需要就阿片类药物滥用的临床定义达成共识,并以明确的临床指南形式进行记录,同时通过加强电子病历整合来实现可操作性。未来的研究应侧重于在不同的医疗环境中验证这些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis and Coding of Opioid Misuse: A Systematic Scoping Review and Implementation Framework.

Objective: To evaluate current administrative coding practices for opioid misuse within the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD) framework and develop standardized documentation recommendations.

Design: Systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Setting: Analysis of studies using administrative databases, including electronic health records, insurance claims, and national healthcare utilization databases.

Subjects: Studies published in peer-reviewed journals examining administrative codes for opioid misuse, excluding those focused solely on illicit drugs, opioid use disorder, or using only natural language processing/qualitative methods.

Methods: Comprehensive search of Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases following PRISMA-S extension guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: Of 9,561 initial records, 19 studies met inclusion criteria. The use of ICD-10 code F11.9* (Opioid use) emerged as the most referenced method for documenting opioid misuse, distinguishing it from opioid use disorder methods (F11.1, opioid abuse; F11.2, opioid dependence). Studies demonstrated significant heterogeneity in coding practices, resulting in code-based definitions identifying only approximately 50% of cases compared to more comprehensive clinical assessment approaches.

Conclusions: While ICD-10 code F11.9* can effectively document opioid misuse as distinct from opioid use disorder, successful implementation requires consensus on the clinical definition of opioid misuse and documentation in the form of clear clinical guidelines and operationalized through enhanced electronic health record integration. Future research should focus on validating these approaches across diverse healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信