芬芬烯酮治疗心力衰竭和预测- hfpef模型估计的风险:芬芬烯酮-心力衰竭的二次分析。

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kirsty McDowell, Kieran F Docherty, Ross T Campbell, Alasdair D Henderson, Pardeep S Jhund, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, James Lay-Flurrie, Lucas Hofmeister, Andrea Scalise, Carolyn S P Lam, Mark C Petrie, Morten Schou, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Jacob A Udell, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray
{"title":"芬芬烯酮治疗心力衰竭和预测- hfpef模型估计的风险:芬芬烯酮-心力衰竭的二次分析。","authors":"Kirsty McDowell, Kieran F Docherty, Ross T Campbell, Alasdair D Henderson, Pardeep S Jhund, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, James Lay-Flurrie, Lucas Hofmeister, Andrea Scalise, Carolyn S P Lam, Mark C Petrie, Morten Schou, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Jacob A Udell, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsty McDowell, Kieran F Docherty, Ross T Campbell, Alasdair D Henderson, Pardeep S Jhund, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, James Lay-Flurrie, Lucas Hofmeister, Andrea Scalise, Carolyn S P Lam, Mark C Petrie, Morten Schou, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Jacob A Udell, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:心力衰竭(HF)和轻度射血分数降低(HFmrEF)或保留射血分数(HFpEF)患者具有一系列风险,治疗效果可能因风险而异。目的:在3期随机临床试验芬尼酮试验中验证HFpEF死亡率和发病率的预后模型(预测-HFpEF),以研究心力衰竭患者优于安慰剂的疗效和安全性(finhearts - hf),并评估芬尼酮在这些患者的风险谱上与安慰剂相比的效果。设计、环境和参与者:finhearts - hf试验在37个国家的653个试验点进行。参与者是在2020年9月至2023年1月期间随机选取的40岁及以上的有症状的HF和左心室EF 40%或更高的成年人。干预:芬尼酮(滴定至20mg或40mg)或安慰剂。主要结局和测量指标:分别计算心血管死亡或心衰住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡的3个PREDICT-HFpEF风险评分。预测风险与观察结果进行比较。采用Harrell C统计量评估模型性能。预测结果的比率(加上心血管死亡和心衰事件恶化的组合,这是试验的主要终点)根据风险评分的五分位数进行检查,芬烯酮的效果也根据风险五分位数进行检查。结果:共6001例患者(平均[SD]年龄72[9.6]岁;3269名男性[54.5%])在FINEARTS-HF试验中随机分组。2年心血管死亡或HF住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡的C统计值分别为0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72)、0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71)和0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71)。与最低风险五分之一相比,最高风险五分之一的综合结果风险大约高出8至10倍。与安慰剂相比,芬尼酮的相对风险降低在所有检查结果的风险谱上是一致的(例如,主要结果的相互作用P值= 0.24)。结论和相关性:finhearts - hf随机临床试验的结果表明,PREDICT-HFpEF模型在校准和区分方面表现良好。基线风险并没有改变芬尼酮的益处。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04435626。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

Importance: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk.

Objectives: To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients.

Design, setting, and participants: The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023.

Intervention: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.

Main outcomes and measures: The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles.

Results: A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信