院前创伤护理中镇痛的趋势:来自多中心数据库创伤登记DGU®的105.908例患者的分析

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Davut Deniz Uzun, Jan-Philipp Stock, Richard Steffen, Jürgen Knapp, Rolf Lefering, Felix C F Schmitt, Markus A Weigand, Matthias Münzberg, Christoph G Woelfl, David Häske
{"title":"院前创伤护理中镇痛的趋势:来自多中心数据库创伤登记DGU®的105.908例患者的分析","authors":"Davut Deniz Uzun, Jan-Philipp Stock, Richard Steffen, Jürgen Knapp, Rolf Lefering, Felix C F Schmitt, Markus A Weigand, Matthias Münzberg, Christoph G Woelfl, David Häske","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01186-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of pain in patients with traumatic injuries is a common task for emergency medicine providers, particularly in the prehospital setting. However, for sufficient and safe analgesia, correct pain recording and documentation is also necessary. The aim of this study was to assess trends in analgesia over the study period and to identify factors that may enable more sufficient pain management in trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TraumaRegister DGU<sup>®</sup> recorded data of patients who were primarily treated at one of the participating hospitals between 2011 and 2020 and received analgesia as part of their prehospital care. This retrospective analysis included a total of 105.908 severely injured patients from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with and without analgesia were compared, and factors associated with analgesia were investigated with logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients enrolled was 50 ± 22 years. 71% were male and 29% were female. Out of all the patients, 66% (n = 70,257) received prehospital analgesia. The average age of patients in the analgesia group was 48 ± 21 years, the non-analgesia group had an average age of 54 ± 23 years. 67% of the male patients received analgesia compared to 64% of the female patients. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the analgesia group was 21.2 points, compared to 16.5 points in the non-analgesia group. 4% of the patients were under the age of sixteen, and of these, 65% received analgesia. 29% of patients were older than 65 years and received analgesia in 57%. Presence of an emergency physician at scene, was a remarkable independent variable for the receipt of analgesia (Odds Ratio 5.55; p < 0.001). Transportation by helicopter was also a significant predictor for analgesia (OR 1.62; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analgesia is a crucial aspect of emergency medicine, as evidenced by relevant guidelines. Nevertheless, it is plausible that a considerable proportion of seriously injured patients do not receive optimal analgesic treatment, or at the very least, this is not documented. In this regard, both aspects require optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in analgesia in prehospital trauma care: an analysis of 105.908 patients from the multicenter database TraumaRegister DGU<sup>®</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Davut Deniz Uzun, Jan-Philipp Stock, Richard Steffen, Jürgen Knapp, Rolf Lefering, Felix C F Schmitt, Markus A Weigand, Matthias Münzberg, Christoph G Woelfl, David Häske\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01186-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of pain in patients with traumatic injuries is a common task for emergency medicine providers, particularly in the prehospital setting. However, for sufficient and safe analgesia, correct pain recording and documentation is also necessary. The aim of this study was to assess trends in analgesia over the study period and to identify factors that may enable more sufficient pain management in trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TraumaRegister DGU<sup>®</sup> recorded data of patients who were primarily treated at one of the participating hospitals between 2011 and 2020 and received analgesia as part of their prehospital care. This retrospective analysis included a total of 105.908 severely injured patients from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with and without analgesia were compared, and factors associated with analgesia were investigated with logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients enrolled was 50 ± 22 years. 71% were male and 29% were female. Out of all the patients, 66% (n = 70,257) received prehospital analgesia. The average age of patients in the analgesia group was 48 ± 21 years, the non-analgesia group had an average age of 54 ± 23 years. 67% of the male patients received analgesia compared to 64% of the female patients. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the analgesia group was 21.2 points, compared to 16.5 points in the non-analgesia group. 4% of the patients were under the age of sixteen, and of these, 65% received analgesia. 29% of patients were older than 65 years and received analgesia in 57%. Presence of an emergency physician at scene, was a remarkable independent variable for the receipt of analgesia (Odds Ratio 5.55; p < 0.001). Transportation by helicopter was also a significant predictor for analgesia (OR 1.62; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analgesia is a crucial aspect of emergency medicine, as evidenced by relevant guidelines. Nevertheless, it is plausible that a considerable proportion of seriously injured patients do not receive optimal analgesic treatment, or at the very least, this is not documented. In this regard, both aspects require optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01186-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01186-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤性损伤患者的疼痛管理是急诊医学提供者的共同任务,特别是在院前环境中。然而,为了充分和安全的镇痛,正确的疼痛记录和文件也是必要的。本研究的目的是评估研究期间镇痛的趋势,并确定可能在创伤护理中实现更充分的疼痛管理的因素。方法:创伤登记DGU®记录了2011年至2020年期间在其中一家参与医院主要治疗的患者的数据,并将镇痛作为其院前护理的一部分。本回顾性分析共包括来自德国、瑞士和奥地利的105.908例严重损伤患者。对有无镇痛的患者进行比较,并采用logistic回归分析探讨与镇痛相关的因素。结果:入组患者平均年龄为50±22岁。男性占71%,女性占29%。在所有患者中,66% (n = 70257)接受院前镇痛。镇痛组患者平均年龄48±21岁,非镇痛组患者平均年龄54±23岁。67%的男性患者接受了镇痛治疗,而64%的女性患者接受了镇痛治疗。镇痛组的平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为21.2分,非镇痛组为16.5分。4%的患者年龄在16岁以下,其中65%的患者接受了镇痛。29%的患者年龄大于65岁,57%的患者接受了镇痛。是否有急诊医生在现场,是接受镇痛的一个显著的独立变量(优势比5.55;结论:镇痛是急诊医学的一个重要方面,相关指南证实了这一点。然而,相当大比例的严重受伤患者没有得到最佳的镇痛治疗,或者至少没有文献记载,这是合理的。在这方面,这两个方面都需要优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in analgesia in prehospital trauma care: an analysis of 105.908 patients from the multicenter database TraumaRegister DGU®.

Background: The management of pain in patients with traumatic injuries is a common task for emergency medicine providers, particularly in the prehospital setting. However, for sufficient and safe analgesia, correct pain recording and documentation is also necessary. The aim of this study was to assess trends in analgesia over the study period and to identify factors that may enable more sufficient pain management in trauma care.

Methods: The TraumaRegister DGU® recorded data of patients who were primarily treated at one of the participating hospitals between 2011 and 2020 and received analgesia as part of their prehospital care. This retrospective analysis included a total of 105.908 severely injured patients from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with and without analgesia were compared, and factors associated with analgesia were investigated with logistic regression analysis.

Results: The mean age of the patients enrolled was 50 ± 22 years. 71% were male and 29% were female. Out of all the patients, 66% (n = 70,257) received prehospital analgesia. The average age of patients in the analgesia group was 48 ± 21 years, the non-analgesia group had an average age of 54 ± 23 years. 67% of the male patients received analgesia compared to 64% of the female patients. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the analgesia group was 21.2 points, compared to 16.5 points in the non-analgesia group. 4% of the patients were under the age of sixteen, and of these, 65% received analgesia. 29% of patients were older than 65 years and received analgesia in 57%. Presence of an emergency physician at scene, was a remarkable independent variable for the receipt of analgesia (Odds Ratio 5.55; p < 0.001). Transportation by helicopter was also a significant predictor for analgesia (OR 1.62; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Analgesia is a crucial aspect of emergency medicine, as evidenced by relevant guidelines. Nevertheless, it is plausible that a considerable proportion of seriously injured patients do not receive optimal analgesic treatment, or at the very least, this is not documented. In this regard, both aspects require optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信