≥75岁患者机器人辅助直肠手术的短期安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Fuminori Teraishi, Yusuke Yoshida, Ryohei Shoji, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Yoshitaka Kondo, Shunsuke Kagawa, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"≥75岁患者机器人辅助直肠手术的短期安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Fuminori Teraishi, Yusuke Yoshida, Ryohei Shoji, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Yoshitaka Kondo, Shunsuke Kagawa, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (≥75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% ≥2 <i>vs.</i> 58.9% in non-older group, <i>p</i>=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 <i>vs.</i> 18 cases, <i>p</i>=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 <i>vs.</i> 9 days, <i>p</i>=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 3","pages":"1291-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term Safety of Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: A Single-center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fuminori Teraishi, Yusuke Yoshida, Ryohei Shoji, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Yuki Matsumi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Yoshitaka Kondo, Shunsuke Kagawa, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (≥75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% ≥2 <i>vs.</i> 58.9% in non-older group, <i>p</i>=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 <i>vs.</i> 18 cases, <i>p</i>=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 <i>vs.</i> 9 days, <i>p</i>=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"1291-1299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:人口老龄化对直肠癌手术治疗提出了挑战。本研究评估了机器人辅助直肠手术(RARS)在75岁及以上患者中的短期安全性,检查了这一弱势人群的围手术期并发症和手术结果。患者和方法:2020年9月至2024年12月在冈山大学医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,包括109例接受RARS的患者。患者分为老年组(≥75岁,n=19)和非老年组(结果:老年组的美国麻醉医师学会分级明显高于老年组(89.5%≥2,非老年组58.9%,p=0.036)。高龄组术后并发症发生率更高(8例vs. 18例,p=0.04),但严重并发症与非高龄组相似。老年组术后中位住院时间较长(12天比9天,p=0.01),但排除造口病例后,这一差异消失。关键的是,两组在30天内均未观察到术后死亡。结论:机器人辅助直肠手术对于75岁及以上的患者是安全的。虽然老年组经历了更多的并发症,但这些主要是可控的。研究结果表明,仔细的患者选择和经验丰富的手术团队可以在保持肿瘤标准的同时成功地在老年患者中使用机器人技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term Safety of Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Background/aim: The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Patients and methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (≥75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results: The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% ≥2 vs. 58.9% in non-older group, p=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 vs. 18 cases, p=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 vs. 9 days, p=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信