{"title":"更正“坦桑尼亚东南部狂犬病水库动态和跨物种传播和家养狗疫苗接种的作用”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lushasi, K., Hayes, S., Ferguson, E. A., Changalucha, J., Cleaveland, S., Govella, N. J., Haydon, D. T., Sambo, M., Mchau, G. J., Mpolya, E. A., Mtema, Z., Nonga, H. E., Steenson, R., Nouvellet, P., Donnelly, C. A., & Hampson, K. (2021). Reservoir dynamics of rabies in south-east Tanzania and the roles of cross-species transmission and domestic dog vaccination. <i>Journal of Applied Ecology</i>, 58(11), 2673–2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13983.</p><p>In the paper by Lushasi et al. (2021), in the section entitled ‘3.1 Parameter estimates’, there was an error in the reporting of the standard deviation of the log-normal distribution. The first sentence currently reads as follows:</p><p>‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 25.4 days (Figure S2a)’.</p><p>It should read as follows:</p><p>‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 32.7 days (Figure S2a)’.</p><p>This was a typing error and does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.</p><p>In addition, there are some minor updates to the Supporting Information Figures S4 and S5. The references to the mixture models have been removed, as issues were identified in the fitting of these models. This does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":"62 3","pages":"739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Reservoir dynamics of rabies in south-east Tanzania and the roles of cross-species transmission and domestic dog vaccination’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2664.14877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lushasi, K., Hayes, S., Ferguson, E. A., Changalucha, J., Cleaveland, S., Govella, N. J., Haydon, D. T., Sambo, M., Mchau, G. J., Mpolya, E. A., Mtema, Z., Nonga, H. E., Steenson, R., Nouvellet, P., Donnelly, C. A., & Hampson, K. (2021). Reservoir dynamics of rabies in south-east Tanzania and the roles of cross-species transmission and domestic dog vaccination. <i>Journal of Applied Ecology</i>, 58(11), 2673–2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13983.</p><p>In the paper by Lushasi et al. (2021), in the section entitled ‘3.1 Parameter estimates’, there was an error in the reporting of the standard deviation of the log-normal distribution. The first sentence currently reads as follows:</p><p>‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 25.4 days (Figure S2a)’.</p><p>It should read as follows:</p><p>‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 32.7 days (Figure S2a)’.</p><p>This was a typing error and does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.</p><p>In addition, there are some minor updates to the Supporting Information Figures S4 and S5. The references to the mixture models have been removed, as issues were identified in the fitting of these models. This does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Ecology\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14877\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14877\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Lushasi, K., Hayes, S., Ferguson, E. A., Changalucha, J.,克利夫兰,S., Govella, n.j., Haydon, d.t ., Sambo, M., Mchau, g.j ., Mpolya, E., Mtema, Z., Nonga, h.e ., Steenson, R., Nouvellet, P., Donnelly, C. A., &;汉普森,K.(2021)。坦桑尼亚东南部狂犬病水库动态以及跨物种传播和家犬疫苗接种的作用。应用生态学报,58(11),2673-2685。https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13983.In在Lushasi et al.(2021)的论文中,在“3.1参数估计”一节中,对数正态分布的标准差报告存在错误。第一句话目前是这样的:“坦桑尼亚北部塞伦盖蒂地区记录的序列间隔的最佳拟合分布是对数正态分布,mu和sigma参数分别为2.80和0.97,对应的平均间隔为26.3天,标准差为25.4天(图S2a)。”它应该是这样的:“坦桑尼亚北部塞伦盖蒂地区记录的序列间隔的最佳拟合分布是对数正态分布,mu和sigma参数分别为2.80和0.97,对应的平均间隔为26.3天,标准差为32.7天(图S2a)”。这是一个打字错误,不会影响论文中呈现的任何结果或结论。此外,辅助资料图S4及S5亦有一些小的更新。对混合模型的引用已被删除,因为在这些模型的拟合中发现了问题。这不会影响论文中呈现的任何结果或结论。我们为这个错误道歉。
Correction to ‘Reservoir dynamics of rabies in south-east Tanzania and the roles of cross-species transmission and domestic dog vaccination’
Lushasi, K., Hayes, S., Ferguson, E. A., Changalucha, J., Cleaveland, S., Govella, N. J., Haydon, D. T., Sambo, M., Mchau, G. J., Mpolya, E. A., Mtema, Z., Nonga, H. E., Steenson, R., Nouvellet, P., Donnelly, C. A., & Hampson, K. (2021). Reservoir dynamics of rabies in south-east Tanzania and the roles of cross-species transmission and domestic dog vaccination. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(11), 2673–2685. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13983.
In the paper by Lushasi et al. (2021), in the section entitled ‘3.1 Parameter estimates’, there was an error in the reporting of the standard deviation of the log-normal distribution. The first sentence currently reads as follows:
‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 25.4 days (Figure S2a)’.
It should read as follows:
‘The best-fitting distribution to the serial intervals recorded from Serengeti District, northern Tanzania was a log-normal with mu and sigma parameters of 2.80 and 0.97, respectively, corresponding to a mean interval of 26.3 days with a standard deviation of 32.7 days (Figure S2a)’.
This was a typing error and does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.
In addition, there are some minor updates to the Supporting Information Figures S4 and S5. The references to the mixture models have been removed, as issues were identified in the fitting of these models. This does not affect any of the results or conclusions that are presented within the paper.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Ecology publishes novel, high-impact papers on the interface between ecological science and the management of biological resources.The editors encourage contributions that use applied ecological problems to test and develop basic theory, although there must be clear potential for impact on the management of the environment.