Cheng-hao Guo, Yin-shuai Geng, Liang-yong Zhu, Xue-fei Ding, Yang Luan
{"title":"活检芯长度对活检标本与根治性前列腺切除术标本Gleason评分差异的影响","authors":"Cheng-hao Guo, Yin-shuai Geng, Liang-yong Zhu, Xue-fei Ding, Yang Luan","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the impact of the biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 247 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer at our centre from 2022 to 2023. The clinical data included age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, number of biopsy needles, number of positive biopsy needles, biopsy core length, biopsy Gleason score and post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score. Statistics were analysed by SPSS26.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>On histopathological examination, no changes in the Gleason score were observed in 127 (51.4%) patients, whereas the Gleason score was upgraded in 101 (40.9%) patients and downgraded in 19 (7.7%) patients at radical prostatectomy. Average biopsy core length for Gleason score upgraded on radical prostatectomy (44.3 %, n = 101) was 11.11 ± 1.34 mm compared to 11.88 ± 1.03 mm(p < 0.01)for Gleason score consistent(55.7 %, n = 127). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the biopsy core length (P < 0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722) and prostate volume (P < 0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722), with both factors being significantly correlated with radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase. Furthermore, these variables were identified as independent predictors of radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase and exhibited a negative correlation. The biopsy core length was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with a cutoff value of 11.4 mm for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (AUC: 0.702, sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity 51.2%, P < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy may be improved with a longer biopsy core length. To enhance the consistency of Gleason scores between biopsy and radical specimens, it is recommended that the biopsy core length be at least 11.4 mm. Patients with a smaller prostate volume are at a higher risk of experiencing discordant pathological grades between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-hao Guo, Yin-shuai Geng, Liang-yong Zhu, Xue-fei Ding, Yang Luan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the impact of the biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 247 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer at our centre from 2022 to 2023. The clinical data included age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, number of biopsy needles, number of positive biopsy needles, biopsy core length, biopsy Gleason score and post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score. Statistics were analysed by SPSS26.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>On histopathological examination, no changes in the Gleason score were observed in 127 (51.4%) patients, whereas the Gleason score was upgraded in 101 (40.9%) patients and downgraded in 19 (7.7%) patients at radical prostatectomy. Average biopsy core length for Gleason score upgraded on radical prostatectomy (44.3 %, n = 101) was 11.11 ± 1.34 mm compared to 11.88 ± 1.03 mm(p < 0.01)for Gleason score consistent(55.7 %, n = 127). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the biopsy core length (P < 0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722) and prostate volume (P < 0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722), with both factors being significantly correlated with radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase. Furthermore, these variables were identified as independent predictors of radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase and exhibited a negative correlation. The biopsy core length was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with a cutoff value of 11.4 mm for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (AUC: 0.702, sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity 51.2%, P < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy may be improved with a longer biopsy core length. To enhance the consistency of Gleason scores between biopsy and radical specimens, it is recommended that the biopsy core length be at least 11.4 mm. Patients with a smaller prostate volume are at a higher risk of experiencing discordant pathological grades between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨活检核长度对前列腺根治术与活检标本Gleason评分差异的影响。患者与方法回顾性分析我院2022 - 2023年247例经会阴前列腺活检及根治性前列腺癌患者的临床资料。临床资料包括年龄、活检前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、前列腺体积、活检针数、阳性活检针数、活检芯长度、活检Gleason评分和根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason评分。采用SPSS26进行统计分析。结果在组织病理学检查中,127例(51.4%)患者的Gleason评分无变化,101例(40.9%)患者的Gleason评分上升,19例(7.7%)患者的Gleason评分下降。根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分提高的患者(44.3%,n = 101)的平均活检芯长度为11.11±1.34 mm,而非11.88±1.03 mm(p <;Gleason评分一致性(55.7%,n = 127)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,活检芯长度(P <;0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429—0.722)和前列腺体积(P <;0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429—0.722),两者均与根治性前列腺切除术Gleason评分升高显著相关。此外,这些变量被确定为根治性前列腺切除术Gleason评分升高的独立预测因子,并呈现负相关。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估活检核心长度,准确诊断前列腺癌的截止值为11.4 mm (AUC: 0.702,敏感性:75.6%,特异性:51.2%,P和lt;0.001)。结论活检与根治性前列腺切除术的一致性可随着活检芯长度的增加而提高。为了提高活检和根治标本之间Gleason评分的一致性,建议活检芯长度至少为11.4 mm。前列腺体积较小的患者在活检和根治性前列腺切除术之间的病理分级不一致的风险更高。
The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen
Objective
To assess the impact of the biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Patients and Methods
Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 247 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer at our centre from 2022 to 2023. The clinical data included age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, number of biopsy needles, number of positive biopsy needles, biopsy core length, biopsy Gleason score and post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score. Statistics were analysed by SPSS26.
Result
On histopathological examination, no changes in the Gleason score were observed in 127 (51.4%) patients, whereas the Gleason score was upgraded in 101 (40.9%) patients and downgraded in 19 (7.7%) patients at radical prostatectomy. Average biopsy core length for Gleason score upgraded on radical prostatectomy (44.3 %, n = 101) was 11.11 ± 1.34 mm compared to 11.88 ± 1.03 mm(p < 0.01)for Gleason score consistent(55.7 %, n = 127). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the biopsy core length (P < 0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722) and prostate volume (P < 0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429–-0.722), with both factors being significantly correlated with radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase. Furthermore, these variables were identified as independent predictors of radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase and exhibited a negative correlation. The biopsy core length was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with a cutoff value of 11.4 mm for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (AUC: 0.702, sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity 51.2%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy may be improved with a longer biopsy core length. To enhance the consistency of Gleason scores between biopsy and radical specimens, it is recommended that the biopsy core length be at least 11.4 mm. Patients with a smaller prostate volume are at a higher risk of experiencing discordant pathological grades between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.