进入多元宇宙:一所理工大学能源社会研究教学策略

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mallory James
{"title":"进入多元宇宙:一所理工大学能源社会研究教学策略","authors":"Mallory James","doi":"10.1109/MTS.2025.3539203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I present the learning goals and teaching strategies for “Social Studies of Energy,” a class I developed and implemented during a phase of personal transition between different educational contexts. By “multiverse,” I refer to my perception of multiple universes of expert knowledge, terminology, interests, and priorities, all coexisting but not necessarily interacting or exchanging with each other in relation to the ambiguous signifier “energy.” These universes of expertise have their own scholarly journals, key definitions, and central intellectual heroes; some include forms of activism in which personal experience, knowledge, and commitment are at least as central as insights gained through formal education. The coexistence of mutually incompatible forms of energy expertise presents teaching challenges. I describe how I decided my scope of inclusivity while designing “Social Studies of Energy” and how I managed associated risks of conceptual, political, and ontological incoherence. Results are relevant for teachers aiming to maintain and expand academic habitats for advanced qualitative reasoning pertaining to engineering and energy studies.","PeriodicalId":55016,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine","volume":"44 1","pages":"101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Into the Multiverse: Strategies for Teaching Social Studies of Energy at a Technical University\",\"authors\":\"Mallory James\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MTS.2025.3539203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, I present the learning goals and teaching strategies for “Social Studies of Energy,” a class I developed and implemented during a phase of personal transition between different educational contexts. By “multiverse,” I refer to my perception of multiple universes of expert knowledge, terminology, interests, and priorities, all coexisting but not necessarily interacting or exchanging with each other in relation to the ambiguous signifier “energy.” These universes of expertise have their own scholarly journals, key definitions, and central intellectual heroes; some include forms of activism in which personal experience, knowledge, and commitment are at least as central as insights gained through formal education. The coexistence of mutually incompatible forms of energy expertise presents teaching challenges. I describe how I decided my scope of inclusivity while designing “Social Studies of Energy” and how I managed associated risks of conceptual, political, and ontological incoherence. Results are relevant for teachers aiming to maintain and expand academic habitats for advanced qualitative reasoning pertaining to engineering and energy studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"101-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10907924/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10907924/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我提出了“能源社会研究”的学习目标和教学策略,这是我在不同教育环境之间的个人过渡阶段开发和实施的课程。通过“多元宇宙”,我指的是我对专业知识、术语、兴趣和优先级的多重宇宙的感知,所有这些都共存,但不一定与模糊的能指“能量”相互作用或交换。这些专业领域都有自己的学术期刊、关键定义和核心知识英雄;有些包括各种形式的行动主义,其中个人经验、知识和承诺至少与通过正规教育获得的见解同等重要。互不相容的能源专业知识形式共存给教学带来了挑战。我描述了我是如何在设计“能源社会研究”时确定我的包容性范围的,以及我是如何管理概念上、政治上和本体论上不连贯的相关风险的。研究结果与旨在维护和扩大与工程和能源研究相关的高级定性推理的学术栖息地的教师相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Into the Multiverse: Strategies for Teaching Social Studies of Energy at a Technical University
In this essay, I present the learning goals and teaching strategies for “Social Studies of Energy,” a class I developed and implemented during a phase of personal transition between different educational contexts. By “multiverse,” I refer to my perception of multiple universes of expert knowledge, terminology, interests, and priorities, all coexisting but not necessarily interacting or exchanging with each other in relation to the ambiguous signifier “energy.” These universes of expertise have their own scholarly journals, key definitions, and central intellectual heroes; some include forms of activism in which personal experience, knowledge, and commitment are at least as central as insights gained through formal education. The coexistence of mutually incompatible forms of energy expertise presents teaching challenges. I describe how I decided my scope of inclusivity while designing “Social Studies of Energy” and how I managed associated risks of conceptual, political, and ontological incoherence. Results are relevant for teachers aiming to maintain and expand academic habitats for advanced qualitative reasoning pertaining to engineering and energy studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Technology and Society Magazine invites feature articles (refereed), special articles, and commentaries on topics within the scope of the IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology, in the broad areas of social implications of electrotechnology, history of electrotechnology, and engineering ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信