对比增强US和CT对肝移植受者局灶性肝病变的诊断:一项比较研究

Nong Gao , Dongli Wang , Xiuzhu Ma , Faqin Lv , Xiuyun Ren
{"title":"对比增强US和CT对肝移植受者局灶性肝病变的诊断:一项比较研究","authors":"Nong Gao ,&nbsp;Dongli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiuzhu Ma ,&nbsp;Faqin Lv ,&nbsp;Xiuyun Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 115 liver transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have focal liver lesions at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2023. All patients were examined by CEUS and CECT and had a definitive pathological diagnosis. Based on the diagnostic outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of these imaging modalities in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions were calculated using a four-table method. Differences in diagnostic efficacy between CEUS and CECT with respect to pathological findings were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The consistency of diagnosis between these modalities was assessed using the linear weighted kappa test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CEUS identified 79 malignant and 36 benign lesions, while CECT detected 81 malignant and 34 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of CEUS and CECT in diagnosis of focal lesions in transplanted livers were 95.7% vs 97.2%, 97.2% vs 96.1%, 97.9% vs 97.5%, 97.2% vs 98.6%, and 96.4% vs 97.1%, respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy (κ = 0.899). CEUS showed strong diagnostic consistency with pathological results (κ = 0.912) and was more effective than CECT in diagnosing focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Both methods were equally effective for diagnosis of focal inflammatory lesions, infarction, and hemangioma.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CEUS is as effective as CECT for diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions in transplanted livers but surpasses CECT in differentiating benign lesions, particularly focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-enhanced US and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Nong Gao ,&nbsp;Dongli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiuzhu Ma ,&nbsp;Faqin Lv ,&nbsp;Xiuyun Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 115 liver transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have focal liver lesions at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2023. All patients were examined by CEUS and CECT and had a definitive pathological diagnosis. Based on the diagnostic outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of these imaging modalities in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions were calculated using a four-table method. Differences in diagnostic efficacy between CEUS and CECT with respect to pathological findings were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The consistency of diagnosis between these modalities was assessed using the linear weighted kappa test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CEUS identified 79 malignant and 36 benign lesions, while CECT detected 81 malignant and 34 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of CEUS and CECT in diagnosis of focal lesions in transplanted livers were 95.7% vs 97.2%, 97.2% vs 96.1%, 97.9% vs 97.5%, 97.2% vs 98.6%, and 96.4% vs 97.1%, respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy (κ = 0.899). CEUS showed strong diagnostic consistency with pathological results (κ = 0.912) and was more effective than CECT in diagnosing focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Both methods were equally effective for diagnosis of focal inflammatory lesions, infarction, and hemangioma.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CEUS is as effective as CECT for diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions in transplanted livers but surpasses CECT in differentiating benign lesions, particularly focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLIVER\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLIVER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947825000052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947825000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的超声造影被广泛应用于肝移植术后并发症的诊断。本研究比较了超声造影(CEUS)与对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)对肝移植受者局灶性肝病变的诊断效果。方法回顾性分析2015年6月至2023年6月在我院诊断为局灶性肝病变的115例肝移植受者。所有患者均行超声造影和ct检查,并有明确的病理诊断。根据诊断结果,采用四表法计算这些影像学方式鉴别良恶性病变的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较CEUS和CECT在病理表现方面的诊断效果差异。使用线性加权kappa检验评估这些模式之间诊断的一致性。结果sceus检出恶性79例,良性36例,CECT检出恶性81例,良性34例。CEUS和CECT诊断移植肝局灶性病变的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和总体准确性分别为95.7%对97.2%、97.2%对96.1%、97.9%对97.5%、97.2%对98.6%、96.4%对97.1%。CEUS和CECT的诊断效能相当(κ = 0.899)。超声造影与病理结果的诊断一致性较强(κ = 0.912),对局灶性正常肝组织及脂肪浸润的诊断比CECT更有效(p <;0.05)。两种方法对局灶性炎性病变、梗死和血管瘤的诊断同样有效。结论ceus对移植肝良恶性病变的诊断与CECT一样有效,但在鉴别良性病变,特别是局灶性正常肝组织和脂肪浸润方面优于CECT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast-enhanced US and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients: A comparative study

Background and aims

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 115 liver transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have focal liver lesions at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2023. All patients were examined by CEUS and CECT and had a definitive pathological diagnosis. Based on the diagnostic outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of these imaging modalities in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions were calculated using a four-table method. Differences in diagnostic efficacy between CEUS and CECT with respect to pathological findings were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The consistency of diagnosis between these modalities was assessed using the linear weighted kappa test.

Results

CEUS identified 79 malignant and 36 benign lesions, while CECT detected 81 malignant and 34 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of CEUS and CECT in diagnosis of focal lesions in transplanted livers were 95.7% vs 97.2%, 97.2% vs 96.1%, 97.9% vs 97.5%, 97.2% vs 98.6%, and 96.4% vs 97.1%, respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy (κ = 0.899). CEUS showed strong diagnostic consistency with pathological results (κ = 0.912) and was more effective than CECT in diagnosing focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration (p < 0.05). Both methods were equally effective for diagnosis of focal inflammatory lesions, infarction, and hemangioma.

Conclusion

CEUS is as effective as CECT for diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions in transplanted livers but surpasses CECT in differentiating benign lesions, particularly focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信