培养语言教师教育研究与实践的联系:多民族志探索

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anwar Ahmed , Brian Morgan
{"title":"培养语言教师教育研究与实践的联系:多民族志探索","authors":"Anwar Ahmed ,&nbsp;Brian Morgan","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article addresses the research-practice divide in education, with a particular focus on language teacher education. In line with this special issue, we see disciplinary value in the concept of “nexus” to describe the dynamic relationship between research and practice, offering a more nuanced framework than traditional dichotomies. After introducing the notion of nexus, we briefly explore the distinction between education and education<em>al</em> research before outlining duoethnography as our methodology. Our central aim is to challenge the prevailing positivistic approaches to research, which prioritize causal generalizations and “what works” models, and to advocate instead for duoethnography – a more conversational and interpretive approach in support of research utilization. Duoethnography is a dialogic and iterative methodology, which enables us to juxtapose our life histories and lived experiences to interrogate our shared topic of interest. This approach generates multiple, often contested understandings of phenomena, foregrounding difference and multivocality. Through our duoethnographic analysis, we argue for the development of critical research literacy among prospective teachers to foster a sustainable and pedagogically meaningful nexus of research and practice. Rather than providing a prescriptive blueprint, we invite readers to engage actively and critically with research by embracing its complexity and interpretive nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 103642"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivating the nexus of research and practice in language teacher education: A duoethnographic exploration\",\"authors\":\"Anwar Ahmed ,&nbsp;Brian Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article addresses the research-practice divide in education, with a particular focus on language teacher education. In line with this special issue, we see disciplinary value in the concept of “nexus” to describe the dynamic relationship between research and practice, offering a more nuanced framework than traditional dichotomies. After introducing the notion of nexus, we briefly explore the distinction between education and education<em>al</em> research before outlining duoethnography as our methodology. Our central aim is to challenge the prevailing positivistic approaches to research, which prioritize causal generalizations and “what works” models, and to advocate instead for duoethnography – a more conversational and interpretive approach in support of research utilization. Duoethnography is a dialogic and iterative methodology, which enables us to juxtapose our life histories and lived experiences to interrogate our shared topic of interest. This approach generates multiple, often contested understandings of phenomena, foregrounding difference and multivocality. Through our duoethnographic analysis, we argue for the development of critical research literacy among prospective teachers to foster a sustainable and pedagogically meaningful nexus of research and practice. Rather than providing a prescriptive blueprint, we invite readers to engage actively and critically with research by embracing its complexity and interpretive nature.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000521\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了教育研究与实践的鸿沟,特别关注语言教师教育。与本期特刊一致,我们看到了“联系”概念的学科价值,它描述了研究与实践之间的动态关系,提供了一个比传统二分法更微妙的框架。在介绍了联系的概念之后,我们简要地探讨了教育和教育研究之间的区别,然后概述了多元民族志作为我们的方法论。我们的中心目标是挑战流行的实证主义研究方法,这种方法优先考虑因果概括和“什么有效”模型,并倡导多元民族志——一种更多对话和解释的方法,以支持研究利用。多元民族志是一种对话和迭代的方法,它使我们能够将我们的生活史和生活经历并列起来,以询问我们共同感兴趣的话题。这种方法产生了对现象、前景差异和多声性的多种、经常有争议的理解。通过我们的多元民族志分析,我们主张在未来教师中培养批判性研究素养,以促进研究和实践之间可持续的、有教学意义的联系。我们不是提供一个规定性的蓝图,而是邀请读者通过接受研究的复杂性和解释性,积极和批判性地参与研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultivating the nexus of research and practice in language teacher education: A duoethnographic exploration
This article addresses the research-practice divide in education, with a particular focus on language teacher education. In line with this special issue, we see disciplinary value in the concept of “nexus” to describe the dynamic relationship between research and practice, offering a more nuanced framework than traditional dichotomies. After introducing the notion of nexus, we briefly explore the distinction between education and educational research before outlining duoethnography as our methodology. Our central aim is to challenge the prevailing positivistic approaches to research, which prioritize causal generalizations and “what works” models, and to advocate instead for duoethnography – a more conversational and interpretive approach in support of research utilization. Duoethnography is a dialogic and iterative methodology, which enables us to juxtapose our life histories and lived experiences to interrogate our shared topic of interest. This approach generates multiple, often contested understandings of phenomena, foregrounding difference and multivocality. Through our duoethnographic analysis, we argue for the development of critical research literacy among prospective teachers to foster a sustainable and pedagogically meaningful nexus of research and practice. Rather than providing a prescriptive blueprint, we invite readers to engage actively and critically with research by embracing its complexity and interpretive nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信