哥伦比亚可再生能源合理选择的多标准评价和多方法分析

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

MethodsX Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103248

Christian M. Moreno-Rocha , José R. Nuñez-Alvarez , Juan Rivera-Alvarado , Alfredo Ghisayz Ruiz , Enderson A. Buelvas-Sanchez

{"title":"哥伦比亚可再生能源合理选择的多标准评价和多方法分析","authors":"Christian M. Moreno-Rocha , José R. Nuñez-Alvarez , Juan Rivera-Alvarado , Alfredo Ghisayz Ruiz , Enderson A. Buelvas-Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores the implementation of renewable energy technologies for power generation using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, including AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, and FUZZY-TOPSIS. Ten renewable energy alternatives were evaluated across seven geographic regions in Colombia, revealing variability in preferences depending on the method and scenario. Alternatives 6 and 4 frequently stood out, while others showed varied rankings. This study significantly contributes to the energy sector by offering a rigorous framework for selecting renewable generation technologies, supporting sustainable energy planning, and providing a model for replication in global contexts, some key points are:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The study applied systematic MCDM approaches to assess renewable energy sources.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Results demonstrated method-dependent variability and highlighted regional preferences.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>It sets a benchmark for integrating sustainable practices into energy planning worldwide.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 103248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria evaluation and multi-method analysis for appropriately selecting renewable energy sources in Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Christian M. Moreno-Rocha , José R. Nuñez-Alvarez , Juan Rivera-Alvarado , Alfredo Ghisayz Ruiz , Enderson A. Buelvas-Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research explores the implementation of renewable energy technologies for power generation using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, including AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, and FUZZY-TOPSIS. Ten renewable energy alternatives were evaluated across seven geographic regions in Colombia, revealing variability in preferences depending on the method and scenario. Alternatives 6 and 4 frequently stood out, while others showed varied rankings. This study significantly contributes to the energy sector by offering a rigorous framework for selecting renewable generation technologies, supporting sustainable energy planning, and providing a model for replication in global contexts, some key points are:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The study applied systematic MCDM approaches to assess renewable energy sources.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Results demonstrated method-dependent variability and highlighted regional preferences.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>It sets a benchmark for integrating sustainable practices into energy planning worldwide.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MethodsX\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MethodsX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125000949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125000949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用多准则决策（MCDM）方法，包括AHP、FAHP、TOPSIS和FUZZY-TOPSIS，探讨可再生能源发电技术的实施。对哥伦比亚七个地理区域的十种可再生能源替代方案进行了评估，揭示了不同方法和方案的偏好差异。选项6和选项4经常脱颖而出，而其他选项的排名则各不相同。本研究通过提供一个选择可再生能源发电技术的严格框架，支持可持续能源规划，并提供一个在全球范围内复制的模型，对能源部门做出了重大贡献，其中一些关键点是：•本研究应用了系统的MCDM方法来评估可再生能源。•结果显示了方法依赖的可变性和突出的区域偏好。•它为将可持续实践纳入全球能源规划设定了基准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Multi-criteria evaluation and multi-method analysis for appropriately selecting renewable energy sources in Colombia

查看原文本刊更多论文

Multi-criteria evaluation and multi-method analysis for appropriately selecting renewable energy sources in Colombia

This research explores the implementation of renewable energy technologies for power generation using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, including AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, and FUZZY-TOPSIS. Ten renewable energy alternatives were evaluated across seven geographic regions in Colombia, revealing variability in preferences depending on the method and scenario. Alternatives 6 and 4 frequently stood out, while others showed varied rankings. This study significantly contributes to the energy sector by offering a rigorous framework for selecting renewable generation technologies, supporting sustainable energy planning, and providing a model for replication in global contexts, some key points are:

•
The study applied systematic MCDM approaches to assess renewable energy sources.
•
Results demonstrated method-dependent variability and highlighted regional preferences.
•
It sets a benchmark for integrating sustainable practices into energy planning worldwide.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊