风湿病医师0 - 10在现代风湿病护理的初始与随访中对炎症、损伤和患者窘迫的评估。

IF 2.8 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Juan Schmukler, Tengfei Li, Joel A Block, Theodore Pincus
{"title":"风湿病医师0 - 10在现代风湿病护理的初始与随访中对炎症、损伤和患者窘迫的评估。","authors":"Juan Schmukler, Tengfei Li, Joel A Block, Theodore Pincus","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to analyze the RheuMetric physician 0 to 10 visual numeric subscale (VNS) estimates of inflammatory activity (DOCINF), organ damage (DOCDAM), and patient distress (DOCDIS) at initial and follow-up routine rheumatology visits for possible incremental information to clarify physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study compared mean DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS and the percentage contributed by inflammation, damage, and distress to DOCGL (total = 100%) at initial and follow-up visits in 563 unselected routine care patients, classified into four diagnosis categories: inflammatory (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], spondylarthritis, vasculitis, and gout), primary osteoarthritis (OA), primary fibromyalgia (FM), and \"other\" diagnoses. Differences between initial and follow-up visits were estimated using t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients, mean DOCGL was 4.0/10, DOCINF 1.6/10, DOCDAM 2.9/10, and DOCDIS 2.4/10, indicating higher estimates for damage and distress than for inflammation, including in all inflammatory diagnoses other than SLE. Highest mean estimates were 2.2 for DOCINF in inflammatory diagnoses, 4.9 for DOCDAM in primary OA, 6.3 for DOCDIS in primary FM. However, DOCDAM was 2.8 (0.6 uniyts higher than DOCINF) in inflammatory diagnoses. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation were significantly higher at initial than at follow-up visits, and estimates of damage were significantly lower at initial than at follow-up visits in all patients and in those with inflammatory diagnoses. DOCGL did not differ significantly at initial versus follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS add feasibly recorded, clinically relevant incremental information to DOCGL. Despite excellent contemporary control of inflammation, joint damage and patient distress remain important clinical problems in contemporary routine rheumatology care, documented by quantitative RheuMetric estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 3","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Schmukler, Tengfei Li, Joel A Block, Theodore Pincus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to analyze the RheuMetric physician 0 to 10 visual numeric subscale (VNS) estimates of inflammatory activity (DOCINF), organ damage (DOCDAM), and patient distress (DOCDIS) at initial and follow-up routine rheumatology visits for possible incremental information to clarify physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study compared mean DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS and the percentage contributed by inflammation, damage, and distress to DOCGL (total = 100%) at initial and follow-up visits in 563 unselected routine care patients, classified into four diagnosis categories: inflammatory (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], spondylarthritis, vasculitis, and gout), primary osteoarthritis (OA), primary fibromyalgia (FM), and \\\"other\\\" diagnoses. Differences between initial and follow-up visits were estimated using t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients, mean DOCGL was 4.0/10, DOCINF 1.6/10, DOCDAM 2.9/10, and DOCDIS 2.4/10, indicating higher estimates for damage and distress than for inflammation, including in all inflammatory diagnoses other than SLE. Highest mean estimates were 2.2 for DOCINF in inflammatory diagnoses, 4.9 for DOCDAM in primary OA, 6.3 for DOCDIS in primary FM. However, DOCDAM was 2.8 (0.6 uniyts higher than DOCINF) in inflammatory diagnoses. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation were significantly higher at initial than at follow-up visits, and estimates of damage were significantly lower at initial than at follow-up visits in all patients and in those with inflammatory diagnoses. DOCGL did not differ significantly at initial versus follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS add feasibly recorded, clinically relevant incremental information to DOCGL. Despite excellent contemporary control of inflammation, joint damage and patient distress remain important clinical problems in contemporary routine rheumatology care, documented by quantitative RheuMetric estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"e70010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在分析风湿病医生在初始和随访常规风湿病就诊时对炎症活动性(DOCINF)、器官损伤(DOCDAM)和患者痛苦(DOCDIS)的0到10视觉数字亚量表(VNS)估计,以获得可能的增量信息,以澄清医生对整体评估(DOCGL)的估计。方法:一项回顾性横断面研究,比较563例未选择常规护理的患者初访和随访时DOCGL、DOCINF、DOCDAM和DOCDIS的平均值,以及炎症、损伤和痛苦对DOCGL的贡献率(总数= 100%),这些患者被分为四种诊断类别:炎症(类风湿关节炎、系统性红斑狼疮[SLE]、脊柱炎、血管炎和痛风)、原发性骨关节炎(OA)、原发性纤维肌痛(FM)和“其他”诊断。使用t检验估计初次和随访之间的差异。结果:在所有患者中,平均DOCGL为4.0/10,DOCINF为1.6/10,DOCDAM为2.9/10,DOCDIS为2.4/10,表明损伤和痛苦的估计高于炎症,包括SLE以外的所有炎症诊断。炎症诊断中DOCINF的最高平均估计值为2.2,原发性OA中的DOCDAM为4.9,原发性FM中的DOCDIS为6.3。然而,DOCDAM在炎症诊断中的得分为2.8(比DOCINF高0.6个单位)。在所有患者和诊断为炎症的患者中,RheuMetric对初始炎症的估计明显高于随访,对初始损伤的估计明显低于随访。DOCGL在初次和随访时没有显著差异。结论:DOCINF、DOCDAM和DOCDIS为DOCGL增加了切实可行的记录的、临床相关的增量信息。尽管当代的炎症控制很好,关节损伤和患者痛苦仍然是当代常规风湿病护理的重要临床问题,由定量的风湿病计量评估记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.

RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.

RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.

RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.

Objective: We aimed to analyze the RheuMetric physician 0 to 10 visual numeric subscale (VNS) estimates of inflammatory activity (DOCINF), organ damage (DOCDAM), and patient distress (DOCDIS) at initial and follow-up routine rheumatology visits for possible incremental information to clarify physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL).

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study compared mean DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS and the percentage contributed by inflammation, damage, and distress to DOCGL (total = 100%) at initial and follow-up visits in 563 unselected routine care patients, classified into four diagnosis categories: inflammatory (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], spondylarthritis, vasculitis, and gout), primary osteoarthritis (OA), primary fibromyalgia (FM), and "other" diagnoses. Differences between initial and follow-up visits were estimated using t-tests.

Results: In all patients, mean DOCGL was 4.0/10, DOCINF 1.6/10, DOCDAM 2.9/10, and DOCDIS 2.4/10, indicating higher estimates for damage and distress than for inflammation, including in all inflammatory diagnoses other than SLE. Highest mean estimates were 2.2 for DOCINF in inflammatory diagnoses, 4.9 for DOCDAM in primary OA, 6.3 for DOCDIS in primary FM. However, DOCDAM was 2.8 (0.6 uniyts higher than DOCINF) in inflammatory diagnoses. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation were significantly higher at initial than at follow-up visits, and estimates of damage were significantly lower at initial than at follow-up visits in all patients and in those with inflammatory diagnoses. DOCGL did not differ significantly at initial versus follow-up visits.

Conclusion: DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS add feasibly recorded, clinically relevant incremental information to DOCGL. Despite excellent contemporary control of inflammation, joint damage and patient distress remain important clinical problems in contemporary routine rheumatology care, documented by quantitative RheuMetric estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信