机械动力在压力控制通风中的应用:一种简单可靠的床边方法。

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224
Jacob W M Snoep, Petra J Rietveld, Franciska van der Velde-Quist, Evert de Jonge, Abraham Schoe
{"title":"机械动力在压力控制通风中的应用:一种简单可靠的床边方法。","authors":"Jacob W M Snoep, Petra J Rietveld, Franciska van der Velde-Quist, Evert de Jonge, Abraham Schoe","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob W M Snoep, Petra J Rietveld, Franciska van der Velde-Quist, Evert de Jonge, Abraham Schoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"e1224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械功率(MP)表示呼吸机在一段时间内对呼吸系统施加的能量。机械通气MP的计算主要有两种方法。第一种是几何法,直接测量呼吸周期中压力-容积环的动态吸气面积。第二种方法涉及使用各种代数方程来估计MP。然而,与被认为是黄金标准的几何方法相比,几乎所有的计算要么复杂,要么不可靠。本研究旨在建立一个易于使用,可靠的床边计算公式,并将其与其他现有计算公式的准确性进行比较。方法:在初步研究中,我们测量了56例机械通气且无自主呼吸努力的MP。这些测量是在荷兰一所大学医学中心的ICU进行的。结果:我们发现,42例患者中56例患者可以使用包含平台压的方程准确计算MP。用我们新提出的公式估计的MP(使用平台压力计算的MP)与MP的参考值相关性良好,偏差为0.2 J/min。95%一致限(LoAs)为-3.1 ~ + 3.4 J/min。其他方程给出如下偏差和LoAs;偏差为-0.8,LoA -3.8至1.9 J/min (van der Meijden方程),偏差为-1.9,LoA -3.7至-0.0 J/min(综合Becher方程),偏差为-2.4,LoA -4.5至-0.3 J/min(简化Becher方程),偏差为-1.9,LoA -3.7至0.1 J/min(线性模型方程)。结论:我们提出的计算压力控制通气中MP的方程是一个可靠、简单和准确的替代先前发表的方程。因此,这种方法非常适合在临床实践中常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method.

Background: Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.

Methods: In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.

Results: We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).

Conclusions: The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信