天然产品使用慢性疼痛:使用模式的新调查,信念,关注,并披露给供应商。

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130251320101
Karen H Seal, Termeh Feinberg, Liliana Moore, Nicole A Woodruff, Natalie Purcell, Daniel Bertenthal, Nicole McCamish, William R Becker
{"title":"天然产品使用慢性疼痛:使用模式的新调查,信念,关注,并披露给供应商。","authors":"Karen H Seal, Termeh Feinberg, Liliana Moore, Nicole A Woodruff, Natalie Purcell, Daniel Bertenthal, Nicole McCamish, William R Becker","doi":"10.1177/27536130251320101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Natural products\" (NPs), including dietary supplements, are widely used, yet little is known about NP use for chronic pain and related conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a new NP survey to better understand reasons for NP use, beliefs, concerns, medication substitution, and provider disclosure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on similar surveys and input from veteran focus groups and subject matter experts, a new brief NP survey was developed. The survey was piloted among 52 veterans with chronic pain enrolled in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care who endorsed NP use at baseline in a pragmatic trial comparing non-drug pain management approaches. Survey data was enriched with sociodemographic and clinical data from a parent trial. Descriptive frequencies and means were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 55 surveys, 52 were completed (response rate, 94.5%). Respondents' mean age was 57.6 (SD+/-12.5); 42% were women, 21% identified as Black/African American, and 10% Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity. All had chronic pain; 80% experienced disabling pain daily; 67% were prescribed non-opioid pain medication; 15% were prescribed opioids. In the prior 3 months, the mean number of NPs used was 4.6 (SD+/-3.2); 90% reported daily use. Most frequently used NPs were vitamins/minerals (94%), herbals/botanicals (60%); and cannabis (40%); one-third reported substituting NPs for pain medications. The majority endorsed safety concerns about interactions of NPs either with pain medications (55%) or other NPs (52%). Nearly all (98%) believed providers should discuss NP use with their patients, though only 52% had disclosed NP use to their providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among veterans with chronic pain in VA primary care enrolled in a pragmatic trial, a new NP survey revealed prevalent use of multiple NPs concurrently, and in some cases, as substitutes for prescribed medications. Most veterans expressed safety concerns, yet a significant proportion reported not discussing NP use with their providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"14 ","pages":"27536130251320101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Product Use for Chronic Pain: A New Survey of Patterns of Use, Beliefs, Concerns, and Disclosure to Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Karen H Seal, Termeh Feinberg, Liliana Moore, Nicole A Woodruff, Natalie Purcell, Daniel Bertenthal, Nicole McCamish, William R Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536130251320101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\\\"Natural products\\\" (NPs), including dietary supplements, are widely used, yet little is known about NP use for chronic pain and related conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a new NP survey to better understand reasons for NP use, beliefs, concerns, medication substitution, and provider disclosure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on similar surveys and input from veteran focus groups and subject matter experts, a new brief NP survey was developed. The survey was piloted among 52 veterans with chronic pain enrolled in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care who endorsed NP use at baseline in a pragmatic trial comparing non-drug pain management approaches. Survey data was enriched with sociodemographic and clinical data from a parent trial. Descriptive frequencies and means were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 55 surveys, 52 were completed (response rate, 94.5%). Respondents' mean age was 57.6 (SD+/-12.5); 42% were women, 21% identified as Black/African American, and 10% Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity. All had chronic pain; 80% experienced disabling pain daily; 67% were prescribed non-opioid pain medication; 15% were prescribed opioids. In the prior 3 months, the mean number of NPs used was 4.6 (SD+/-3.2); 90% reported daily use. Most frequently used NPs were vitamins/minerals (94%), herbals/botanicals (60%); and cannabis (40%); one-third reported substituting NPs for pain medications. The majority endorsed safety concerns about interactions of NPs either with pain medications (55%) or other NPs (52%). Nearly all (98%) believed providers should discuss NP use with their patients, though only 52% had disclosed NP use to their providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among veterans with chronic pain in VA primary care enrolled in a pragmatic trial, a new NP survey revealed prevalent use of multiple NPs concurrently, and in some cases, as substitutes for prescribed medications. Most veterans expressed safety concerns, yet a significant proportion reported not discussing NP use with their providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"27536130251320101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130251320101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130251320101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:“天然产物”(NPs),包括膳食补充剂,被广泛使用,但对NP用于慢性疼痛和相关疾病知之甚少。目的:开展一项新的NP调查,以更好地了解NP使用的原因、信念、担忧、药物替代和提供者信息披露。方法:基于类似的调查和资深焦点小组和主题专家的意见,开发了一个新的简短NP调查。该调查在52名患有慢性疼痛的退伍军人健康管理局(VA)初级保健的退伍军人中进行了试点,这些退伍军人在一项比较非药物疼痛管理方法的实用试验中支持在基线时使用NP。调查数据丰富了来自家长试验的社会人口学和临床数据。计算描述频率和平均值。结果:55份问卷中,完成52份,回复率为94.5%。受访者平均年龄57.6岁(SD+/-12.5);42%为女性,21%为黑人/非裔美国人,10%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。所有人都有慢性疼痛;80%的人每天都经历致残疼痛;67%的患者服用非阿片类止痛药;15%的人服用阿片类药物。前3个月,使用NPs的平均数量为4.6 (SD+/-3.2);90%的人报告每天使用。最常用的NPs是维生素/矿物质(94%),草药/植物药(60%);大麻(40%);三分之一的人报告用NPs代替止痛药。大多数人赞同NPs与止痛药(55%)或其他NPs(52%)相互作用的安全性问题。几乎所有(98%)的人认为医生应该与患者讨论NP的使用,尽管只有52%的人向医生透露了NP的使用情况。结论:在退伍军人事务部初级保健的慢性疼痛退伍军人中,一项新的NP调查显示,同时普遍使用多种NP,在某些情况下,作为处方药的替代品。大多数退伍军人表达了对安全的担忧,但很大一部分人表示没有与他们的提供者讨论NP的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural Product Use for Chronic Pain: A New Survey of Patterns of Use, Beliefs, Concerns, and Disclosure to Providers.

Background: "Natural products" (NPs), including dietary supplements, are widely used, yet little is known about NP use for chronic pain and related conditions.

Objective: To develop a new NP survey to better understand reasons for NP use, beliefs, concerns, medication substitution, and provider disclosure.

Methods: Based on similar surveys and input from veteran focus groups and subject matter experts, a new brief NP survey was developed. The survey was piloted among 52 veterans with chronic pain enrolled in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care who endorsed NP use at baseline in a pragmatic trial comparing non-drug pain management approaches. Survey data was enriched with sociodemographic and clinical data from a parent trial. Descriptive frequencies and means were calculated.

Results: Of 55 surveys, 52 were completed (response rate, 94.5%). Respondents' mean age was 57.6 (SD+/-12.5); 42% were women, 21% identified as Black/African American, and 10% Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity. All had chronic pain; 80% experienced disabling pain daily; 67% were prescribed non-opioid pain medication; 15% were prescribed opioids. In the prior 3 months, the mean number of NPs used was 4.6 (SD+/-3.2); 90% reported daily use. Most frequently used NPs were vitamins/minerals (94%), herbals/botanicals (60%); and cannabis (40%); one-third reported substituting NPs for pain medications. The majority endorsed safety concerns about interactions of NPs either with pain medications (55%) or other NPs (52%). Nearly all (98%) believed providers should discuss NP use with their patients, though only 52% had disclosed NP use to their providers.

Conclusions: Among veterans with chronic pain in VA primary care enrolled in a pragmatic trial, a new NP survey revealed prevalent use of multiple NPs concurrently, and in some cases, as substitutes for prescribed medications. Most veterans expressed safety concerns, yet a significant proportion reported not discussing NP use with their providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信