{"title":"波斯语版吉列功能评估问卷在脑瘫患者中的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Saeid Fatorehchy, Razieh Sadeghian Afarani, Mehdi Rassafiani, Nazila Akbarfahimi, Mohsen Vahedi","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2472985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aimed to evaluate the content, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of The Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) for assessing functional mobility in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Persian FAQ were translated and verified according to international standards. To assess concurrent validity, Spearman's coefficient was used to correlate the FAQ scores with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) ratings of 148 participants. In addition, test-retest reliability was evaluated among 30 participants by calculating weighted kappa coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated almost perfect test-retest reliability (κw = 0.836, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and strong concurrent validity. Spearman correlation coefficients between the FAQ and GMFCS were -0.913, while correlations between the FAQ and FMS were calculated separately for each of the three FMS distances, ranging from 0.880 to 0.914 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings confirm the validity and reliability of the Persian FAQ in assessing functional mobility across diverse settings for children with CP. The Persian FAQ proves to be a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers in understanding and addressing functional mobility challenges in children with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and reliability of the Persian version of Gillette functional assessment questionnaire in patients with cerebral palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Saeid Fatorehchy, Razieh Sadeghian Afarani, Mehdi Rassafiani, Nazila Akbarfahimi, Mohsen Vahedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2472985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aimed to evaluate the content, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of The Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) for assessing functional mobility in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Persian FAQ were translated and verified according to international standards. To assess concurrent validity, Spearman's coefficient was used to correlate the FAQ scores with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) ratings of 148 participants. In addition, test-retest reliability was evaluated among 30 participants by calculating weighted kappa coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated almost perfect test-retest reliability (κw = 0.836, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and strong concurrent validity. Spearman correlation coefficients between the FAQ and GMFCS were -0.913, while correlations between the FAQ and FMS were calculated separately for each of the three FMS distances, ranging from 0.880 to 0.914 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings confirm the validity and reliability of the Persian FAQ in assessing functional mobility across diverse settings for children with CP. The Persian FAQ proves to be a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers in understanding and addressing functional mobility challenges in children with CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2472985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2472985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估用于评估儿童和青少年脑瘫(CP)功能活动能力的吉列功能评估问卷(FAQ)的内容、并发效度和重测信度。材料和方法:根据国际标准对波斯语常见问题解答进行了翻译和验证。为了评估并发效度,采用Spearman系数将148名参与者的FAQ得分与大肌肉运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平和功能活动量表(FMS)评分进行关联。此外,通过计算加权kappa系数来评估30名参与者的重测信度。结果:该研究显示了几乎完美的重测信度(κw = 0.836, p p)。结论:这些发现证实了波斯常见问题在评估不同环境下CP儿童功能活动能力方面的有效性和可靠性。波斯常见问题被证明是临床医生和研究人员了解和解决CP儿童功能活动能力挑战的宝贵工具。
Validation and reliability of the Persian version of Gillette functional assessment questionnaire in patients with cerebral palsy.
Purpose: This research aimed to evaluate the content, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of The Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) for assessing functional mobility in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).
Materials and methods: The Persian FAQ were translated and verified according to international standards. To assess concurrent validity, Spearman's coefficient was used to correlate the FAQ scores with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) ratings of 148 participants. In addition, test-retest reliability was evaluated among 30 participants by calculating weighted kappa coefficients.
Results: The study demonstrated almost perfect test-retest reliability (κw = 0.836, p < 0.001) and strong concurrent validity. Spearman correlation coefficients between the FAQ and GMFCS were -0.913, while correlations between the FAQ and FMS were calculated separately for each of the three FMS distances, ranging from 0.880 to 0.914 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: These findings confirm the validity and reliability of the Persian FAQ in assessing functional mobility across diverse settings for children with CP. The Persian FAQ proves to be a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers in understanding and addressing functional mobility challenges in children with CP.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.