卡介苗治疗膀胱癌:通过基于人工智能的社交媒体分析探索患者的体验和担忧。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Bladder Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/23523735241304907
Zine-Eddine Khene, Isamu Tachibana, Raj Bhanvadia, Hagan Ausmann, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan
{"title":"卡介苗治疗膀胱癌:通过基于人工智能的社交媒体分析探索患者的体验和担忧。","authors":"Zine-Eddine Khene, Isamu Tachibana, Raj Bhanvadia, Hagan Ausmann, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan","doi":"10.1177/23523735241304907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a notable disparity between the guidelines for BCG therapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Reddit has emerged as a popular online platform for individuals seeking information and exchanging their experiences related to bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and classify public opinions about intravesical BCG therapy as shared on Reddit, a popular social media platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed an artificial intelligence-based approach to examine discussions related to intravesical BCG therapy on a social media platform over the past ten years. An artificial intelligence framework was developed to categorize these conversations into distinct topics and thematic categories. This framework included a partially supervised model for processing natural language (using BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a method for reducing data complexity, and an algorithm for clustering. Additionally, each conversation was assessed for sentiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1223 unique discussions related to BCG therapy were analyzed, comprising 110 unique posts and 1113 comments from 268 distinct authors. We identified four overarching thematic groups: 1) BCG administration procedures, (2) hesitancy in initiating or maintaining BCG treatment, (3) issues related to BCG shortage and alternative treatments, and (4) side effects of BCG treatment. Sentiment analysis of the 1223 discussions revealed that 25.2% (308) exhibited a negative sentiment, 58.3% (713) were neutral, and 16.5% (202) showed a positive sentiment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online social media often contains detailed personal experiences with BCG therapy, not commonly found in medical literature. Understanding these experiences can help medical professionals improve care and treatment adherence in NMIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"10 4","pages":"290-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BCG therapy for bladder cancer: Exploring patient experiences and concerns through artificial intelligence-based social media analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zine-Eddine Khene, Isamu Tachibana, Raj Bhanvadia, Hagan Ausmann, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23523735241304907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a notable disparity between the guidelines for BCG therapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Reddit has emerged as a popular online platform for individuals seeking information and exchanging their experiences related to bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and classify public opinions about intravesical BCG therapy as shared on Reddit, a popular social media platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed an artificial intelligence-based approach to examine discussions related to intravesical BCG therapy on a social media platform over the past ten years. An artificial intelligence framework was developed to categorize these conversations into distinct topics and thematic categories. This framework included a partially supervised model for processing natural language (using BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a method for reducing data complexity, and an algorithm for clustering. Additionally, each conversation was assessed for sentiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1223 unique discussions related to BCG therapy were analyzed, comprising 110 unique posts and 1113 comments from 268 distinct authors. We identified four overarching thematic groups: 1) BCG administration procedures, (2) hesitancy in initiating or maintaining BCG treatment, (3) issues related to BCG shortage and alternative treatments, and (4) side effects of BCG treatment. Sentiment analysis of the 1223 discussions revealed that 25.2% (308) exhibited a negative sentiment, 58.3% (713) were neutral, and 16.5% (202) showed a positive sentiment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online social media often contains detailed personal experiences with BCG therapy, not commonly found in medical literature. Understanding these experiences can help medical professionals improve care and treatment adherence in NMIBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder Cancer\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"290-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23523735241304907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23523735241304907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卡介苗治疗非肌性浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的指南存在显著差异。Reddit已经成为一个受欢迎的在线平台,供个人寻求有关膀胱癌的信息并交流他们的经验。目的:调查并分类热门社交媒体平台Reddit上关于膀胱内BCG治疗的公众意见。方法:本研究采用基于人工智能的方法来检查过去十年社交媒体平台上有关膀胱内BCG治疗的讨论。开发了一个人工智能框架,将这些对话分类为不同的主题和主题类别。该框架包括一个用于处理自然语言的部分监督模型(使用BERT[来自变压器的双向编码器表示]),一个用于降低数据复杂性的方法,以及一个用于聚类的算法。此外,每次谈话都要评估情绪。结果:共分析了1223条与BCG治疗相关的独特讨论,包括来自268位不同作者的110条独特帖子和1113条评论。我们确定了四个总体主题组:1)卡介苗给药程序,(2)开始或维持卡介苗治疗的犹豫,(3)与卡介苗短缺和替代治疗相关的问题,以及(4)卡介苗治疗的副作用。对1223个讨论的情绪分析结果显示,25.2%(308个)的人持否定态度,58.3%(713个)的人持中立态度,16.5%(202个)的人持肯定态度。结论:在线社交媒体经常包含卡介苗治疗的详细个人经历,这在医学文献中并不常见。了解这些经验可以帮助医疗专业人员提高NMIBC患者的护理和治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BCG therapy for bladder cancer: Exploring patient experiences and concerns through artificial intelligence-based social media analysis.

Background: There is a notable disparity between the guidelines for BCG therapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Reddit has emerged as a popular online platform for individuals seeking information and exchanging their experiences related to bladder cancer.

Objective: To investigate and classify public opinions about intravesical BCG therapy as shared on Reddit, a popular social media platform.

Methods: This study employed an artificial intelligence-based approach to examine discussions related to intravesical BCG therapy on a social media platform over the past ten years. An artificial intelligence framework was developed to categorize these conversations into distinct topics and thematic categories. This framework included a partially supervised model for processing natural language (using BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a method for reducing data complexity, and an algorithm for clustering. Additionally, each conversation was assessed for sentiment.

Results: A total of 1223 unique discussions related to BCG therapy were analyzed, comprising 110 unique posts and 1113 comments from 268 distinct authors. We identified four overarching thematic groups: 1) BCG administration procedures, (2) hesitancy in initiating or maintaining BCG treatment, (3) issues related to BCG shortage and alternative treatments, and (4) side effects of BCG treatment. Sentiment analysis of the 1223 discussions revealed that 25.2% (308) exhibited a negative sentiment, 58.3% (713) were neutral, and 16.5% (202) showed a positive sentiment.

Conclusion: Online social media often contains detailed personal experiences with BCG therapy, not commonly found in medical literature. Understanding these experiences can help medical professionals improve care and treatment adherence in NMIBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信