非特异性肩痛患者压力疼痛阈值(PPT)评估的绝对和相对可靠性。

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyriakos Pavlou, Antonis Constantinou, Christos Savva, George M Pamboris, Panagiotis Kyriakou, George Ploutarchou, Christos Karagiannis, Vasileios Korakakis
{"title":"非特异性肩痛患者压力疼痛阈值(PPT)评估的绝对和相对可靠性。","authors":"Kyriakos Pavlou, Antonis Constantinou, Christos Savva, George M Pamboris, Panagiotis Kyriakou, George Ploutarchou, Christos Karagiannis, Vasileios Korakakis","doi":"10.1177/17585732251319739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251319739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain.\",\"authors\":\"Kyriakos Pavlou, Antonis Constantinou, Christos Savva, George M Pamboris, Panagiotis Kyriakou, George Ploutarchou, Christos Karagiannis, Vasileios Korakakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251319739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251319739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251319739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251319739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了非特异性肩痛患者压力痛阈值评估的内部和内部可靠性,重点是慢性和亚急性阶段。26个成年人的样本被评估使用机械algometer跨越六个解剖点。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化(MDC)计算组内和组间信度。结果表明,内部评估(ICC范围:0.96-0.99)和内部评估(ICC范围:0.92-0.99)的可靠性几乎是完美的。除了上斜方肌和中三角肌的MDC值超过了大平均值的25%外,测量和MDC值的标准误差显示临床可接受的误差,这表明非特异性肩关节疼痛分期之间的精度降低。对于交叉可靠性,短拇内收肌、上斜方肌和冈下肌也显示出较低的精度,MDC值超过了大平均值的25%,特别是在慢性患者中。尽管有这些发现,但在亚急性组和慢性组之间没有观察到显著差异。虽然相对信度很高,但研究结果强调了在解释绝对信度时需要谨慎,特别是在特定肌肉部位的评分者间评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Absolute and relative reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) assessment in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain.

This study investigates the intra- and interrater reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold assessments in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain, focusing on chronic and subacute stages. A sample of 26 adults was evaluated using a mechanical algometer across six anatomical points. Intrarater and interrater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results demonstrated almost perfect reliability for both intrarater (ICC range: 0.96-0.99) and interrater (ICC range: 0.92-0.99) assessments. Standard error of measurement and MDC values for intrarater reliability showed clinically acceptable error, except for the upper trapezius and mid-deltoid, where MDC value exceeded 25% of the grand mean, suggesting reduced precision between nonspecific shoulder pain stages. For interrater reliability, the adductor pollicis brevis, upper trapezius, and infraspinatus also showed less precision, with MDC values exceeding 25% of the grand mean, particularly in chronic patients. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed between the subacute and chronic groups. While relative reliability was high, the findings highlight the need for caution in interpreting absolute reliability, especially for inter-rater assessments at specific muscle sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信