Modern ultrasound techniques for diagnosing liver steatosis and fibrosis: A systematic review with a focus on biopsy comparison.

Background: This review evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of various ultrasound (US) methods compared to liver biopsy.

Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of US techniques in assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis in adults, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as the standard measure.

Methods: The review included original retrospective or prospective studies published in the last three years in peer-reviewed medical journals, that reported AUROC values. Studies were identified through PubMed searches on January 3 and April 30, 2024. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results were tabulated according to the diagnostic method and the type of liver pathology.

Results: The review included 52 studies. For liver fibrosis detection, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) AUROCs ranged from 0.54 to 0.994, showing better accuracy for advanced stages. Modifications, including 2D-SWE with propagation map guidance and supersonic imagine achieved AUROCs of 0.84 to nearly 1.0. point SWE and classical SWE had AUROCs of 0.741-0.99, and 0.507-0.995, respectively. Transient elastography (TE), visual TE, vibration-controlled TE (VCTE), and FibroTouch reported AUROCs close to 1.0. For steatosis, VCTE with controlled attenuation parameter showed AUROCs up to 0.89 (for ≥ S1), acoustic radiation force impulse ranged from 0.762 to 0.784, US attenuation parameter from 0.88 to 0.93, and normalized local variance measurement from 0.583 to 0.875. Most studies had a low risk of bias across all or most domains, but evidence was limited by variability in study quality and small sample sizes. Innovative SWE variants were evaluated in a single study.

Conclusion: Modern US techniques can serve as effective noninvasive diagnostic tools for liver fibrosis and steatosis, with the potential to reduce the reliance on biopsies.