Jonathan K Chandler, Badr Jandali, Katie Joyce, Dale Smith, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Isuru Ratnayake, Kyle R Brownback
{"title":"COVID-19机械通气患者俯卧位的疗效。","authors":"Jonathan K Chandler, Badr Jandali, Katie Joyce, Dale Smith, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Isuru Ratnayake, Kyle R Brownback","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS is associated with reduced mortality. COVID-19 causes variable pulmonary involvement in some patients suffering from severe respiratory failure and ARDS. Although proning in the COVID-19 patient population is increasingly common, more data are needed to fully understand its utility in those with ARDS due to COVID-19. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a single-center retrospective study, inclusive of 100 consecutive subjects intubated for ARDS from COVID-19, admitted to the ICU from September 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected daily from time of intubation for 7 d along with 30-d outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The study included a total of 53 subjects proned and 47 nonproned during their hospitalization. Proned subjects had a mean age of 61.8 years and 56.6% were male, compared with a mean age of 66.3 years and 57.4% male in the nonproned group. Age, sex, other baseline characteristics, and treatments were similar between groups, except that proned subjects had a higher body mass index than nonproned subjects (34.1 ± 7.5 vs 30.5 ± 7.4, kg/m<sup>2</sup> <i>P</i> = .02) and lower initial P/F ratios (119.1 ± 54.5 vs 154.0 ± 92.7 mm Hg, <i>P</i> = .047). Proned subjects received more neuromuscular blockade (OR 6.63, 95% CI 3.25-13.12, <i>P</i> < .001) and higher sedation levels (two sedatives: OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08; ≥3 sedatives: OR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.96-12.81) with similar ICU stays, ventilator days, newly initiated renal replacement therapy, and 30-d outcomes including being alive, out of the ICU, or discharged from the hospital when compared with nonproned subjects. There were a total of 15 (28.3%) complications related to proning. Proned subjects were reintubated significantly less than the nonproned group (1.9% vs 19.1%, <i>P</i> = .006). <b>Conclusions:</b> Proning mechanically ventilated COVID-19 subjects was associated with more frequent use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation, and lower rates of re-intubation, for respiratory failure when compared with nonproned subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"830-837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan K Chandler, Badr Jandali, Katie Joyce, Dale Smith, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Isuru Ratnayake, Kyle R Brownback\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.11259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS is associated with reduced mortality. COVID-19 causes variable pulmonary involvement in some patients suffering from severe respiratory failure and ARDS. Although proning in the COVID-19 patient population is increasingly common, more data are needed to fully understand its utility in those with ARDS due to COVID-19. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a single-center retrospective study, inclusive of 100 consecutive subjects intubated for ARDS from COVID-19, admitted to the ICU from September 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected daily from time of intubation for 7 d along with 30-d outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The study included a total of 53 subjects proned and 47 nonproned during their hospitalization. Proned subjects had a mean age of 61.8 years and 56.6% were male, compared with a mean age of 66.3 years and 57.4% male in the nonproned group. Age, sex, other baseline characteristics, and treatments were similar between groups, except that proned subjects had a higher body mass index than nonproned subjects (34.1 ± 7.5 vs 30.5 ± 7.4, kg/m<sup>2</sup> <i>P</i> = .02) and lower initial P/F ratios (119.1 ± 54.5 vs 154.0 ± 92.7 mm Hg, <i>P</i> = .047). Proned subjects received more neuromuscular blockade (OR 6.63, 95% CI 3.25-13.12, <i>P</i> < .001) and higher sedation levels (two sedatives: OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08; ≥3 sedatives: OR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.96-12.81) with similar ICU stays, ventilator days, newly initiated renal replacement therapy, and 30-d outcomes including being alive, out of the ICU, or discharged from the hospital when compared with nonproned subjects. There were a total of 15 (28.3%) complications related to proning. Proned subjects were reintubated significantly less than the nonproned group (1.9% vs 19.1%, <i>P</i> = .006). <b>Conclusions:</b> Proning mechanically ventilated COVID-19 subjects was associated with more frequent use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation, and lower rates of re-intubation, for respiratory failure when compared with nonproned subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"830-837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11259\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:重度ARDS机械通气患者俯卧位与死亡率降低相关。COVID-19在一些患有严重呼吸衰竭和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者中引起不同程度的肺部受累。尽管在COVID-19患者群体中pronen越来越普遍,但需要更多的数据来充分了解其在COVID-19引起的ARDS患者中的效用。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了2020年9月至2020年12月在ICU住院的100例连续插管的COVID-19 ARDS患者。从插管时间开始每天收集数据7 d以及30 d的结果。结果:本研究共纳入53例住院期间易感和47例非易感患者。易发组的平均年龄为61.8岁,男性占56.6%,而非易发组的平均年龄为66.3岁,男性占57.4%。两组之间的年龄、性别、其他基线特征和治疗方法相似,除了易感者的体重指数高于非易感者(34.1±7.5 vs 30.5±7.4,kg/m2 P = 0.02)和较低的初始P/F比(119.1±54.5 vs 154.0±92.7 mm Hg, P = 0.047)。易受影响的受试者接受更多的神经肌肉阻断(OR 6.63, 95% CI 3.25-13.12, P < .001)和更高的镇静水平(两种镇静剂:OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08;≥3种镇静剂:OR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.96-12.81),与非倾向受试者相比,ICU住院时间、呼吸机天数、新开始的肾脏替代治疗和30 d结局(包括存活、离开ICU或出院)相似。与翻位相关的并发症15例(28.3%)。易翻组的再插管率明显低于非易翻组(1.9% vs 19.1%, P = 0.006)。结论:与未俯卧的受试者相比,机械通气的COVID-19受试者更频繁地使用神经肌肉阻断和镇静,并且呼吸衰竭的再插管率更低。
Outcomes of Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients.
Background: Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS is associated with reduced mortality. COVID-19 causes variable pulmonary involvement in some patients suffering from severe respiratory failure and ARDS. Although proning in the COVID-19 patient population is increasingly common, more data are needed to fully understand its utility in those with ARDS due to COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study, inclusive of 100 consecutive subjects intubated for ARDS from COVID-19, admitted to the ICU from September 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected daily from time of intubation for 7 d along with 30-d outcomes. Results: The study included a total of 53 subjects proned and 47 nonproned during their hospitalization. Proned subjects had a mean age of 61.8 years and 56.6% were male, compared with a mean age of 66.3 years and 57.4% male in the nonproned group. Age, sex, other baseline characteristics, and treatments were similar between groups, except that proned subjects had a higher body mass index than nonproned subjects (34.1 ± 7.5 vs 30.5 ± 7.4, kg/m2P = .02) and lower initial P/F ratios (119.1 ± 54.5 vs 154.0 ± 92.7 mm Hg, P = .047). Proned subjects received more neuromuscular blockade (OR 6.63, 95% CI 3.25-13.12, P < .001) and higher sedation levels (two sedatives: OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08; ≥3 sedatives: OR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.96-12.81) with similar ICU stays, ventilator days, newly initiated renal replacement therapy, and 30-d outcomes including being alive, out of the ICU, or discharged from the hospital when compared with nonproned subjects. There were a total of 15 (28.3%) complications related to proning. Proned subjects were reintubated significantly less than the nonproned group (1.9% vs 19.1%, P = .006). Conclusions: Proning mechanically ventilated COVID-19 subjects was associated with more frequent use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation, and lower rates of re-intubation, for respiratory failure when compared with nonproned subjects.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.