低资源环境中的儿科静脉通路困难评分:外部验证研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332
Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij
{"title":"低资源环境中的儿科静脉通路困难评分:外部验证研究。","authors":"Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"372-377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Difficult Intravenous Access Scores in a Low-Resource Setting: An External Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"372-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在建立和评估中低收入国家(LMIC)低资源急诊环境中儿科静脉注射困难(DIVA)评分的有效性数据。我们还试图探索DIVA的相关因素,这些因素可能有助于在我们的环境中获得最佳表现的改良儿科DIVA评分。方法:我们在泰国曼谷的一家大型大学医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,研究对象是年龄在0至15岁、需要紧急或紧急外周静脉注射(PIVA)超过10个月的儿童。DIVA被定义为PIVA第一次尝试失败。对于每个候选DIVA模型,构建接收者工作特征曲线,并计算曲线下面积。收集患者和提供者的其他候选预测因素,并使用逻辑回归模型进行分析。结果:在纳入的392名儿童的方便样本中,DIVA率为30.1%。三变量DIVA (DIVA3)和四变量DIVA评分(DIVA4)在我们的人群中显示出相似的测试特征,用于识别首次尝试失败率至少为50%的患者。静脉可视性、静脉触感、年龄、DIVA病史是DIVA的显著相关因素。通过纳入与DIVA相关的4个因素,制定了LMIC-DIVA评分,与DIVA3和DIVA4评分相比,LMIC-DIVA评分具有更强的判别能力。LMIC-DIVA、DIVA3和DIVA4的曲线下面积分别为0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83)、0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70)和0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67)。结论:本研究为LMIC环境下的DIVA3和DIVA4评分提供了外部验证数据。新的修改的4变量LMIC-DIVA评分改善了我们人群中识别儿科DIVA的测试特征和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Difficult Intravenous Access Scores in a Low-Resource Setting: An External Validation Study.

Objectives: This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.

Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.

Results: Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.

Conclusion: This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信