Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij
{"title":"低资源环境中的儿科静脉通路困难评分:外部验证研究。","authors":"Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Difficult Intravenous Access Scores in a Low-Resource Setting: An External Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Panida Kanjanauptom, David Kessler, Sirin Khongjaroensakun, Suphalak Darunaitorn, Worapant Kriengsoontornkij\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pediatric Difficult Intravenous Access Scores in a Low-Resource Setting: An External Validation Study.
Objectives: This study aims to establish and evaluate validity data for pediatric difficult intravenous access (DIVA) scores in low-resource emergency care settings within low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). We also sought to explore associated factors for DIVA that could contribute to a modified pediatric DIVA score with optimal performance in our setting.
Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in children aged 0 to 15 years who required urgent or emergent peripheral intravenous access (PIVA) over a 10-month period in a large university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. DIVA was defined as a failure of PIVA on the first attempt. For each candidate DIVA model, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curves was calculated. Additional candidate predictive factors of patients and providers were collected and analyzed using a logistic regression model.
Results: Among a convenience sample of 392 children enrolled, the DIVA rate was 30.1%. Three-variable DIVA (DIVA3) and 4-variable DIVA scores (DIVA4) demonstrated similar test characteristics in our population in identifying patients with first attempt failure rate of at least 50%. Vein visibility, vein palpability, younger age, and history of DIVA were statistically significant factors related to DIVA. Through the inclusion of 4 factors associated with DIVA, the LMIC-DIVA score was developed and exhibited superior discriminative ability compared with the DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores. The area under the curves for LMIC-DIVA, DIVA3, and DIVA4 were 0.79 (95% CI=0.74-0.83), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.70), and 0.62 (95% CI=0.56-0.67), respectively.
Conclusion: This study provides external validation data for DIVA3 and DIVA4 scores in the LMIC setting. The novel modified 4-variable LMIC-DIVA score improves test characteristics and accuracy in identifying pediatric DIVA in our population.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.