低温镇痛在青少年漏斗胸修复(铜)后疼痛管理:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1111/pan.15090
M Bastianello, M Torre, R Bonfiglio, M G Calevo, L Palomba, P Uva, A Kanapari, G Lorenzoni, N Disma
{"title":"低温镇痛在青少年漏斗胸修复(铜)后疼痛管理:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"M Bastianello, M Torre, R Bonfiglio, M G Calevo, L Palomba, P Uva, A Kanapari, G Lorenzoni, N Disma","doi":"10.1111/pan.15090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair with the minimally invasive approach frequently report severe postoperative pain. The goal of the study is to determine the superiority of cryoanalgesia compared to standard of care for return to normal quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, active controlled, parallel groups trial (category IIb medical device) was designed for patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. Participants were screened from the elective surgical lists at Istituto Gaslini, Genova, Italy, and they all were part of the academic practice setting. Once enrolled, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms: cryoanalgesia vs. standard of care (epidural-based analgesia). The primary outcome was the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and the subcomponents (psychosocial and physical health) 14 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (278/2021-DB id 11 421) and conducted between February 2022 and October 2023. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study: forty-five to cryoanalgesia and forty-three in the epidural arm. The PedsQL median (IQR) at the 14th day was 59.8 (48.4, 71.2) vs. 67.9 (58.7, 73.9) (95% CI: 0.46-13; difference 6.5; p = 0.07) with ITT analysis, and 59.8 (48.37, 71.20) vs. 69.02 (58.70, 73.91) (95% CI: 0.82, 14; difference 7.4; p = 0.028) with PP analysis, in the cryoanalgesia and in the standard of care group, respectively. Irrespective of treatment, a significant decrease in both the PedsQL total score and its subcomponents was found. This effect persisted when stratified by treatment: physical health showed a decrease in both arms, while psychosocial health demonstrated a more marked decrease in the standard of care arm (q-value = 0.028), but not in the cryoanalgesia arm (q-value = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryoanalgesia did not improve return to baseline quality of life 2 weeks after surgery. However, it showed to be beneficial in the psychosocial component of the PedsQL scale.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05201820.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"347-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"M Bastianello, M Torre, R Bonfiglio, M G Calevo, L Palomba, P Uva, A Kanapari, G Lorenzoni, N Disma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.15090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair with the minimally invasive approach frequently report severe postoperative pain. The goal of the study is to determine the superiority of cryoanalgesia compared to standard of care for return to normal quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, active controlled, parallel groups trial (category IIb medical device) was designed for patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. Participants were screened from the elective surgical lists at Istituto Gaslini, Genova, Italy, and they all were part of the academic practice setting. Once enrolled, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms: cryoanalgesia vs. standard of care (epidural-based analgesia). The primary outcome was the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and the subcomponents (psychosocial and physical health) 14 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (278/2021-DB id 11 421) and conducted between February 2022 and October 2023. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study: forty-five to cryoanalgesia and forty-three in the epidural arm. The PedsQL median (IQR) at the 14th day was 59.8 (48.4, 71.2) vs. 67.9 (58.7, 73.9) (95% CI: 0.46-13; difference 6.5; p = 0.07) with ITT analysis, and 59.8 (48.37, 71.20) vs. 69.02 (58.70, 73.91) (95% CI: 0.82, 14; difference 7.4; p = 0.028) with PP analysis, in the cryoanalgesia and in the standard of care group, respectively. Irrespective of treatment, a significant decrease in both the PedsQL total score and its subcomponents was found. This effect persisted when stratified by treatment: physical health showed a decrease in both arms, while psychosocial health demonstrated a more marked decrease in the standard of care arm (q-value = 0.028), but not in the cryoanalgesia arm (q-value = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryoanalgesia did not improve return to baseline quality of life 2 weeks after surgery. However, it showed to be beneficial in the psychosocial component of the PedsQL scale.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05201820.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"347-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975181/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用微创入路进行漏斗胸修复术的患者经常报告严重的术后疼痛。该研究的目的是确定与标准护理相比,冷冻镇痛在恢复正常生活质量方面的优势。方法:采用随机、主动对照、平行组试验(IIb类医疗器械)设计漏斗胸修复术患者。参与者是从意大利热那亚加斯里尼研究所的选择性外科名单中筛选出来的,他们都是学术实践环境的一部分。一旦入组,患者被随机分配到两个研究组之一:低温镇痛与标准治疗(硬膜外镇痛)。主要结局是术后14天的儿童生活质量(PedsQL)及其子组成部分(心理社会和身体健康)。研究方案已获得伦理委员会批准(278/2021-DB id 11 421),于2022年2月至2023年10月进行。88名患者参加了这项研究:45名患者接受低温镇痛,43名患者接受硬膜外麻醉。第14天的PedsQL中位数(IQR)为59.8(48.4,71.2)对67.9 (58.7,73.9)(95% CI: 0.46-13;差异6.5;p = 0.07),分别为59.8(48.37,71.20)和69.02 (58.70,73.91)(95% CI: 0.82, 14;差异7.4;p = 0.028),经PP分析,分别在冷冻镇痛组和标准护理组。无论治疗方式如何,PedsQL总分及其子成分均显著下降。当按治疗分层时,这种效应仍然存在:生理健康在两个组中都有所下降,而心理社会健康在标准护理组中表现出更显著的下降(q值= 0.028),但在冷冻镇痛组中没有(q值= 0.056)。结论:术后2周低温镇痛并不能改善患者的基线生活质量。然而,它在PedsQL量表的社会心理部分显示有益。试验注册:NCT05201820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Patients undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair with the minimally invasive approach frequently report severe postoperative pain. The goal of the study is to determine the superiority of cryoanalgesia compared to standard of care for return to normal quality of life.

Methods: A randomized, active controlled, parallel groups trial (category IIb medical device) was designed for patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. Participants were screened from the elective surgical lists at Istituto Gaslini, Genova, Italy, and they all were part of the academic practice setting. Once enrolled, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms: cryoanalgesia vs. standard of care (epidural-based analgesia). The primary outcome was the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and the subcomponents (psychosocial and physical health) 14 days after surgery.

Results: Protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (278/2021-DB id 11 421) and conducted between February 2022 and October 2023. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study: forty-five to cryoanalgesia and forty-three in the epidural arm. The PedsQL median (IQR) at the 14th day was 59.8 (48.4, 71.2) vs. 67.9 (58.7, 73.9) (95% CI: 0.46-13; difference 6.5; p = 0.07) with ITT analysis, and 59.8 (48.37, 71.20) vs. 69.02 (58.70, 73.91) (95% CI: 0.82, 14; difference 7.4; p = 0.028) with PP analysis, in the cryoanalgesia and in the standard of care group, respectively. Irrespective of treatment, a significant decrease in both the PedsQL total score and its subcomponents was found. This effect persisted when stratified by treatment: physical health showed a decrease in both arms, while psychosocial health demonstrated a more marked decrease in the standard of care arm (q-value = 0.028), but not in the cryoanalgesia arm (q-value = 0.056).

Conclusions: Cryoanalgesia did not improve return to baseline quality of life 2 weeks after surgery. However, it showed to be beneficial in the psychosocial component of the PedsQL scale.

Trial registration: NCT05201820.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信