体感训练:系统回顾和荟萃分析与方法学考虑和临床见解。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ryoki Sasaki, Sho Kojima, Kei Saito, Hideaki Onishi
{"title":"体感训练:系统回顾和荟萃分析与方法学考虑和临床见解。","authors":"Ryoki Sasaki, Sho Kojima, Kei Saito, Hideaki Onishi","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01579-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Somatosensory training, which involves repetitive somatosensory stimulation, has been employed to enhance somatosensory performance by modulating excitability in the primary somatosensory cortex. This process, known as perceptual learning, can benefit stroke patients with somatosensory deficits. However, its effectiveness in both healthy individuals and stroke patients has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of somatosensory training in these groups. However, no eligible data on stroke patients were identified, excluding them from the analysis. In healthy participants, somatosensory training improved performance in 61.2% datasets, but this effect was observed only at the stimulated site. Additionally, it increased early somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes in 76.9% of datasets at the stimulated site, with no effect on the non-stimulated site. Despite these moderate improvements, the risk of bias assessment revealed methodological concerns including randomization process, proper control conditions, blinding information, and missing data. The meta-analysis focused on the impact of somatosensory training on tactile two-point discrimination (TPD) in various factors, including different age groups, stimulus durations, stimulus frequencies, and stimulus types. A marked reduction in TPD threshold was observed at the stimulated finger post-training compared to pre-training, though there was a noticeable heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, no significant changes occurred at the non-stimulated fingers, and the subgroup analysis found no specific factors influencing TPD improvements. Although somatosensory training benefits healthy individuals, the variability and methodological concerns highlight the need for further high-quality research to optimize its use in treating somatosensory deficits in stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Somatosensory training: a systematic review and meta-analysis with methodological considerations and clinical insights.\",\"authors\":\"Ryoki Sasaki, Sho Kojima, Kei Saito, Hideaki Onishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12984-025-01579-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Somatosensory training, which involves repetitive somatosensory stimulation, has been employed to enhance somatosensory performance by modulating excitability in the primary somatosensory cortex. This process, known as perceptual learning, can benefit stroke patients with somatosensory deficits. However, its effectiveness in both healthy individuals and stroke patients has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of somatosensory training in these groups. However, no eligible data on stroke patients were identified, excluding them from the analysis. In healthy participants, somatosensory training improved performance in 61.2% datasets, but this effect was observed only at the stimulated site. Additionally, it increased early somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes in 76.9% of datasets at the stimulated site, with no effect on the non-stimulated site. Despite these moderate improvements, the risk of bias assessment revealed methodological concerns including randomization process, proper control conditions, blinding information, and missing data. The meta-analysis focused on the impact of somatosensory training on tactile two-point discrimination (TPD) in various factors, including different age groups, stimulus durations, stimulus frequencies, and stimulus types. A marked reduction in TPD threshold was observed at the stimulated finger post-training compared to pre-training, though there was a noticeable heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, no significant changes occurred at the non-stimulated fingers, and the subgroup analysis found no specific factors influencing TPD improvements. Although somatosensory training benefits healthy individuals, the variability and methodological concerns highlight the need for further high-quality research to optimize its use in treating somatosensory deficits in stroke patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01579-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01579-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体感训练,包括重复的体感刺激,已经被用来通过调节初级体感皮层的兴奋性来提高体感表现。这个过程被称为感知学习,可以使有体感缺陷的中风患者受益。然而,它对健康个体和中风患者的有效性尚未得到彻底的调查。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估体感训练在这些组中的有效性。然而,没有确定卒中患者的合格数据,将其排除在分析之外。在健康参与者中,体感训练在61.2%的数据集中提高了表现,但这种效果仅在受刺激部位观察到。此外,它增加了76.9%的受刺激部位的早期体感诱发电位振幅,而对非受刺激部位没有影响。尽管有这些适度的改善,偏倚评估的风险揭示了方法学上的问题,包括随机化过程、适当的控制条件、盲目信息和缺失数据。meta分析了体感训练对触觉两点辨别(TPD)的影响,包括不同年龄组、刺激持续时间、刺激频率和刺激类型。与训练前相比,训练后受刺激手指的TPD阈值显着降低,尽管在研究中存在明显的异质性。相比之下,未受刺激的手指没有发生显著变化,亚组分析没有发现影响TPD改善的特定因素。尽管体感训练对健康个体有益,但其可变性和方法学方面的问题突出了需要进一步的高质量研究,以优化其在治疗卒中患者体感缺陷中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Somatosensory training: a systematic review and meta-analysis with methodological considerations and clinical insights.

Somatosensory training, which involves repetitive somatosensory stimulation, has been employed to enhance somatosensory performance by modulating excitability in the primary somatosensory cortex. This process, known as perceptual learning, can benefit stroke patients with somatosensory deficits. However, its effectiveness in both healthy individuals and stroke patients has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of somatosensory training in these groups. However, no eligible data on stroke patients were identified, excluding them from the analysis. In healthy participants, somatosensory training improved performance in 61.2% datasets, but this effect was observed only at the stimulated site. Additionally, it increased early somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes in 76.9% of datasets at the stimulated site, with no effect on the non-stimulated site. Despite these moderate improvements, the risk of bias assessment revealed methodological concerns including randomization process, proper control conditions, blinding information, and missing data. The meta-analysis focused on the impact of somatosensory training on tactile two-point discrimination (TPD) in various factors, including different age groups, stimulus durations, stimulus frequencies, and stimulus types. A marked reduction in TPD threshold was observed at the stimulated finger post-training compared to pre-training, though there was a noticeable heterogeneity across studies. In contrast, no significant changes occurred at the non-stimulated fingers, and the subgroup analysis found no specific factors influencing TPD improvements. Although somatosensory training benefits healthy individuals, the variability and methodological concerns highlight the need for further high-quality research to optimize its use in treating somatosensory deficits in stroke patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信