Glenn Maguire, Ethan Tang, Thomas Looi, Dale Podolsky
{"title":"Robotic Assisted Cleft Palate Repair Using Novel 3 mm Tools: A Reachability and Collision Analysis.","authors":"Glenn Maguire, Ethan Tang, Thomas Looi, Dale Podolsky","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3534119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cleft palate repair is technically challenging: visualization is reduced, delicate dissection is required, and instrument reachability is limited within the infant oral cavity using standard instruments. A 3 mm diameter pin-jointed wristed tool was developed that couples to a da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK) to perform infant cleft palate surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A reachability simulation analysis was performed to determine the number of collisions (tool-tool and tool-cavity) for tool tip positions within the oral cavity and the impact of dVRK trocar height. Tool reachability was measured using a reachability ratio of collision-free to total poses considered for a given oral cavity target point. Three physical experiments were performed using a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator: (1) the 3 mm tools were compared to existing 8 mm tools assessing visual field obstruction and the number of collisions during suturing tasks; (2) an end-to-end robotic assisted cleft palate repair was performed on the simulator using the new tool assessing collisions; and (3) the impact of trocar height on tool performance was investigated to validate the reachability simulation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3 mm tools demonstrated fifteen times fewer tool-cavity collisions and 21% less visual obstruction than the 8 mm tools. Average tool-cavity collisions per throw demonstrated an increasing trend posteriorly within the oral cavity (nasal mucosa: , ; oral mucosa: , ); and a 31% increase (, ) with increasing trocar height.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/significance: </strong>Physical experiments validated tool functionality for cleft repair and the reachability analysis reveals increasing collision risk deeper within the oral cavity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3534119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic Assisted Cleft Palate Repair Using Novel 3 mm Tools: A Reachability and Collision Analysis.
Objective: Cleft palate repair is technically challenging: visualization is reduced, delicate dissection is required, and instrument reachability is limited within the infant oral cavity using standard instruments. A 3 mm diameter pin-jointed wristed tool was developed that couples to a da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK) to perform infant cleft palate surgery.
Methods: A reachability simulation analysis was performed to determine the number of collisions (tool-tool and tool-cavity) for tool tip positions within the oral cavity and the impact of dVRK trocar height. Tool reachability was measured using a reachability ratio of collision-free to total poses considered for a given oral cavity target point. Three physical experiments were performed using a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator: (1) the 3 mm tools were compared to existing 8 mm tools assessing visual field obstruction and the number of collisions during suturing tasks; (2) an end-to-end robotic assisted cleft palate repair was performed on the simulator using the new tool assessing collisions; and (3) the impact of trocar height on tool performance was investigated to validate the reachability simulation analysis.
Results: The 3 mm tools demonstrated fifteen times fewer tool-cavity collisions and 21% less visual obstruction than the 8 mm tools. Average tool-cavity collisions per throw demonstrated an increasing trend posteriorly within the oral cavity (nasal mucosa: , ; oral mucosa: , ); and a 31% increase (, ) with increasing trocar height.
Conclusion/significance: Physical experiments validated tool functionality for cleft repair and the reachability analysis reveals increasing collision risk deeper within the oral cavity.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.