{"title":"能否通过调整单次呼吸肺泡容积来估计真实的肺活量?","authors":"Simon Kristoffer Høgh Rasmusen, Jann Mortensen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2025.2470002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total lung capacity (TLC) measured with single-breath gas diffusion (TLCsb) is systematically lower than TLC measured with whole-body plethysmography (TLCwbp) especially in patients with obstructive defects. We aimed to develop and validate a regression correction equation to reduce the discrepancy between the two measurements of TLC. Second, we compared the ability to detect restriction (reduced TLC) from adjusted TLC measured by single-breath (TLCsb<sub>adj</sub>) with gold standard TLCwbp.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung function data from 800 consecutive patients were analysed with multivariable linear regression. A group of 530 were included for model development, and 270 were used for model validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TLCsb was found to be on average 1.1 L lower than TLCwbp (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference increased with degree of airway obstruction. After adjustment TLCsb<sub>adj</sub> did not significantly differ from TLCwbp in obstructive and mixed obstructive-restrictive subjects. TLCsb<sub>adj</sub> had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 99% to predict restriction on an individual basis, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-19.6%; 17.7%] percentage when comparing adjusted values of TLCsb with the true TLCwbp value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjustment TLCsb was no longer significantly underestimated in obstructive and mixed restrictive-obstructive groups compared to TLCwbp. The adjustment can be used on individual subjects to estimate restriction via the TLCsb, thereby making the single-breath gas diffusion method a more valid alternative than without adjustment, when compared with the gold standard whole-body plethysmography to measure TLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"2470002"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the single-breath alveolar volume be adjusted to estimate true total lung capacity?\",\"authors\":\"Simon Kristoffer Høgh Rasmusen, Jann Mortensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2025.2470002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total lung capacity (TLC) measured with single-breath gas diffusion (TLCsb) is systematically lower than TLC measured with whole-body plethysmography (TLCwbp) especially in patients with obstructive defects. We aimed to develop and validate a regression correction equation to reduce the discrepancy between the two measurements of TLC. Second, we compared the ability to detect restriction (reduced TLC) from adjusted TLC measured by single-breath (TLCsb<sub>adj</sub>) with gold standard TLCwbp.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung function data from 800 consecutive patients were analysed with multivariable linear regression. A group of 530 were included for model development, and 270 were used for model validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TLCsb was found to be on average 1.1 L lower than TLCwbp (<i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference increased with degree of airway obstruction. After adjustment TLCsb<sub>adj</sub> did not significantly differ from TLCwbp in obstructive and mixed obstructive-restrictive subjects. TLCsb<sub>adj</sub> had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 99% to predict restriction on an individual basis, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-19.6%; 17.7%] percentage when comparing adjusted values of TLCsb with the true TLCwbp value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjustment TLCsb was no longer significantly underestimated in obstructive and mixed restrictive-obstructive groups compared to TLCwbp. The adjustment can be used on individual subjects to estimate restriction via the TLCsb, thereby making the single-breath gas diffusion method a more valid alternative than without adjustment, when compared with the gold standard whole-body plethysmography to measure TLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"2470002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2470002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2470002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:单次呼吸气体扩散(TLCsb)测量的总肺活量(TLC)系统性地低于全身体积脉搏图(TLCwbp)测量的TLC,特别是在有阻塞性缺陷的患者中。我们的目的是建立并验证一个回归校正方程,以减少两种TLC测量之间的差异。其次,我们比较了单次呼吸测量的调整TLC (TLCsbadj)与金标准TLCwbp检测限制(减少的TLC)的能力。方法:对连续800例患者的肺功能资料进行多变量线性回归分析。其中530人用于模型开发,270人用于模型验证。结果:梗阻性和阻-阻混合组TLCsb比TLCwbp平均低1.1 L (p值与TLCwbp无显著差异)。TLCsbadj预测个体限制的敏感性为70%,特异性为99%,95%可信区间(CI)为-19.6%;在TLCsb调整值与TLCwbp真实值比较时,占17.7%的百分比。结论:与TLCwbp相比,调整后的TLCsb在梗阻性和混合限制性梗阻性组中不再被显著低估。该调整可用于个体受试者,通过TLCsb估计限制,从而使单呼吸气体扩散法比不进行调整的方法更有效,当与金标准全身容积脉搏描记法测量TLC时。
Can the single-breath alveolar volume be adjusted to estimate true total lung capacity?
Background: Total lung capacity (TLC) measured with single-breath gas diffusion (TLCsb) is systematically lower than TLC measured with whole-body plethysmography (TLCwbp) especially in patients with obstructive defects. We aimed to develop and validate a regression correction equation to reduce the discrepancy between the two measurements of TLC. Second, we compared the ability to detect restriction (reduced TLC) from adjusted TLC measured by single-breath (TLCsbadj) with gold standard TLCwbp.
Methods: Lung function data from 800 consecutive patients were analysed with multivariable linear regression. A group of 530 were included for model development, and 270 were used for model validation.
Results: TLCsb was found to be on average 1.1 L lower than TLCwbp (p < 0.001). This difference increased with degree of airway obstruction. After adjustment TLCsbadj did not significantly differ from TLCwbp in obstructive and mixed obstructive-restrictive subjects. TLCsbadj had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 99% to predict restriction on an individual basis, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-19.6%; 17.7%] percentage when comparing adjusted values of TLCsb with the true TLCwbp value.
Conclusions: After adjustment TLCsb was no longer significantly underestimated in obstructive and mixed restrictive-obstructive groups compared to TLCwbp. The adjustment can be used on individual subjects to estimate restriction via the TLCsb, thereby making the single-breath gas diffusion method a more valid alternative than without adjustment, when compared with the gold standard whole-body plethysmography to measure TLC.