胃癌患者腹膜转移的预后价值:一项基于全国人群的研究。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109
Niels A D Guchelaar, Micha J de Neijs, Bo J Noordman, Heilida E C Graaf, Irene E G van Hellemond, Pieter C van der Sluis, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Rob H A Verhoeven, Stijn L W Koolen, Misha D P Luyer, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen
{"title":"胃癌患者腹膜转移的预后价值:一项基于全国人群的研究。","authors":"Niels A D Guchelaar, Micha J de Neijs, Bo J Noordman, Heilida E C Graaf, Irene E G van Hellemond, Pieter C van der Sluis, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Rob H A Verhoeven, Stijn L W Koolen, Misha D P Luyer, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peritoneum is a common metastatic site in gastric cancer. The prognosis of synchronous peritoneal metastases compared to other metastatic sites in gastric cancer remains understudied. This study aims to evaluate the impact of peritoneal metastases on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with gastric cancer and synchronous metastases between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized based on the site of metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated for each metastatic site group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics, including the impact of systemic therapy, on OS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 4072 patients were included, of whom 1835 (45.1%) had peritoneal metastases. Of these, 58.1% had isolated peritoneal metastases. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with systemic therapy, the median OS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-9.5), compared to 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.7-1.9) for treatment-naïve patients, who received only palliative care. The survival for patients with isolated peritoneal metastases (4.4 months, 95% CI: 4.0-4.8 months) was similar to those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases (4.6 months, 95% CI: 4.2-5.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.185). Systemic therapy was associated with comparable survival in patients with peritoneal metastases and those with metastases at other sites.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with isolated peritoneal metastases and those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer. Our findings emphasize the unique prognostic landscape for peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer, underscoring the need for disease-specific evaluations, rather than relying on assumptions derived from other cancer types.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103109"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Niels A D Guchelaar, Micha J de Neijs, Bo J Noordman, Heilida E C Graaf, Irene E G van Hellemond, Pieter C van der Sluis, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Rob H A Verhoeven, Stijn L W Koolen, Misha D P Luyer, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peritoneum is a common metastatic site in gastric cancer. The prognosis of synchronous peritoneal metastases compared to other metastatic sites in gastric cancer remains understudied. This study aims to evaluate the impact of peritoneal metastases on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with gastric cancer and synchronous metastases between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized based on the site of metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated for each metastatic site group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics, including the impact of systemic therapy, on OS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 4072 patients were included, of whom 1835 (45.1%) had peritoneal metastases. Of these, 58.1% had isolated peritoneal metastases. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with systemic therapy, the median OS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-9.5), compared to 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.7-1.9) for treatment-naïve patients, who received only palliative care. The survival for patients with isolated peritoneal metastases (4.4 months, 95% CI: 4.0-4.8 months) was similar to those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases (4.6 months, 95% CI: 4.2-5.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.185). Systemic therapy was associated with comparable survival in patients with peritoneal metastases and those with metastases at other sites.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with isolated peritoneal metastases and those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer. Our findings emphasize the unique prognostic landscape for peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer, underscoring the need for disease-specific evaluations, rather than relying on assumptions derived from other cancer types.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"103109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹膜是胃癌最常见的转移部位。与胃癌其他转移部位相比,同步腹膜转移的预后仍有待进一步研究。本研究旨在评估腹膜转移对转移性胃癌患者生存的影响。方法:在2015年至2020年期间,从荷兰全国癌症登记处确定胃癌和同步转移患者。根据转移部位对患者进行分类。计算每个转移部位组的中位总生存期(OS)。进行多变量Cox回归分析以评估患者、肿瘤和治疗特征之间的关系,包括全身治疗对OS的影响。结果:共纳入4072例患者,其中1835例(45.1%)发生腹膜转移。其中,58.1%有分离性腹膜转移。对于接受全身治疗的转移性胃癌患者,中位OS为9.0个月(95%可信区间(CI): 8.6-9.5),而仅接受姑息治疗的treatment-naïve患者的中位OS为1.7个月(95% CI: 1.7-1.9)。分离性腹膜转移患者的生存期(4.4个月,95% CI: 4.0-4.8个月)与分离性非腹膜转移患者的生存期(4.6个月,95% CI: 4.2-5.1个月,调整后危险度:0.94,95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.185)相似。全身治疗与腹膜转移和其他部位转移患者的生存率相当。解释:本研究表明胃癌孤立性腹膜转移患者与孤立性非腹膜转移患者的生存率无统计学差异。我们的研究结果强调了胃癌腹膜转移的独特预后前景,强调了对疾病特异性评估的必要性,而不是依赖于其他癌症类型的假设。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prognostic value of peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based study.

Background: The peritoneum is a common metastatic site in gastric cancer. The prognosis of synchronous peritoneal metastases compared to other metastatic sites in gastric cancer remains understudied. This study aims to evaluate the impact of peritoneal metastases on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods: Patients with gastric cancer and synchronous metastases between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized based on the site of metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated for each metastatic site group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics, including the impact of systemic therapy, on OS.

Findings: A total of 4072 patients were included, of whom 1835 (45.1%) had peritoneal metastases. Of these, 58.1% had isolated peritoneal metastases. For patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with systemic therapy, the median OS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-9.5), compared to 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.7-1.9) for treatment-naïve patients, who received only palliative care. The survival for patients with isolated peritoneal metastases (4.4 months, 95% CI: 4.0-4.8 months) was similar to those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases (4.6 months, 95% CI: 4.2-5.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.185). Systemic therapy was associated with comparable survival in patients with peritoneal metastases and those with metastases at other sites.

Interpretation: This study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with isolated peritoneal metastases and those with isolated non-peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer. Our findings emphasize the unique prognostic landscape for peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer, underscoring the need for disease-specific evaluations, rather than relying on assumptions derived from other cancer types.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信