预测出院后48小时内重症监护病房再入院的机器学习模型的多中心验证。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112
Leerang Lim, Mincheol Kim, Kyungjae Cho, Dongjoon Yoo, Dayeon Sim, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyung-Chul Lee
{"title":"预测出院后48小时内重症监护病房再入院的机器学习模型的多中心验证。","authors":"Leerang Lim, Mincheol Kim, Kyungjae Cho, Dongjoon Yoo, Dayeon Sim, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyung-Chul Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission is a crucial indicator of patient safety. However, discharge decisions often rely on subjective assessment due to a lack of standardized guidelines. We aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict ICU readmission within 48 h and compare its performance to traditional scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an ensemble model, iREAD, that generates a probability score at ICU discharge, representing the likelihood of the patient being readmitted to the ICU within 48 h, using data from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) and validated it using the MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD datasets. From September 2007 to August 2021, a total of 70,842 patients were included from SNUH. The MIMIC-III datasets comprised 43,237 patients admitted to ICUs between 2001 and 2012 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the eICU-CRD datasets included 90,271 ICU admissions across 208 hospitals between 2014 and 2015. Patients younger than 18, those who died in ICUs, or who refused life-sustaining treatment were excluded from the final analysis. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared to the traditional scores and conventional machine learning models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the high-risk and low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We developed the iREAD, that utilized 30 input features, encompassing demographics, length of stay, vital signs, GCS, and laboratory values. iREAD demonstrated superior performance compared with other models across all cohorts (all P < 0.001). In the internal validation, iREAD achieved AUROCs of 0.771 (95% CI 0.743-0.798), 0.834 (0.821-0.846), and 0.820 (0.808-0.832) for early (≤48 h), late (>48 h), and overall ICU readmissions, respectively. External validations with MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD also showed modest performance with AUROCs of 0.768 (0.748-0.787) and 0.725 (0.712-0.739) for overall readmission in MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD respectively, demonstrating superior performance compared to other models (All P < 0.001; higher than other models). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that over 40% of high-risk patients predicted by iREAD were readmitted within 48 h, representing a more than four-fold increase in predictive performance compared to the traditional scores.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>iREAD demonstrates superior performance in predicting ICU readmission within 48 h after discharge compared to traditional scoring systems or conventional machine learning models in both internal and external validations. While the performance degradation observed in the external validations suggests the need for further prospective validation on diverse patient populations, the robust performance and ability to identify high-risk patients have the potential to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the Korea Health Technology Research & Development Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number RS-2021-KH114109).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103112"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge.\",\"authors\":\"Leerang Lim, Mincheol Kim, Kyungjae Cho, Dongjoon Yoo, Dayeon Sim, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyung-Chul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission is a crucial indicator of patient safety. However, discharge decisions often rely on subjective assessment due to a lack of standardized guidelines. We aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict ICU readmission within 48 h and compare its performance to traditional scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an ensemble model, iREAD, that generates a probability score at ICU discharge, representing the likelihood of the patient being readmitted to the ICU within 48 h, using data from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) and validated it using the MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD datasets. From September 2007 to August 2021, a total of 70,842 patients were included from SNUH. The MIMIC-III datasets comprised 43,237 patients admitted to ICUs between 2001 and 2012 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the eICU-CRD datasets included 90,271 ICU admissions across 208 hospitals between 2014 and 2015. Patients younger than 18, those who died in ICUs, or who refused life-sustaining treatment were excluded from the final analysis. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared to the traditional scores and conventional machine learning models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the high-risk and low-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We developed the iREAD, that utilized 30 input features, encompassing demographics, length of stay, vital signs, GCS, and laboratory values. iREAD demonstrated superior performance compared with other models across all cohorts (all P < 0.001). In the internal validation, iREAD achieved AUROCs of 0.771 (95% CI 0.743-0.798), 0.834 (0.821-0.846), and 0.820 (0.808-0.832) for early (≤48 h), late (>48 h), and overall ICU readmissions, respectively. External validations with MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD also showed modest performance with AUROCs of 0.768 (0.748-0.787) and 0.725 (0.712-0.739) for overall readmission in MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD respectively, demonstrating superior performance compared to other models (All P < 0.001; higher than other models). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that over 40% of high-risk patients predicted by iREAD were readmitted within 48 h, representing a more than four-fold increase in predictive performance compared to the traditional scores.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>iREAD demonstrates superior performance in predicting ICU readmission within 48 h after discharge compared to traditional scoring systems or conventional machine learning models in both internal and external validations. While the performance degradation observed in the external validations suggests the need for further prospective validation on diverse patient populations, the robust performance and ability to identify high-risk patients have the potential to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the Korea Health Technology Research & Development Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number RS-2021-KH114109).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"103112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872568/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)再入院是患者安全的重要指标。然而,由于缺乏标准化的指导方针,出院决定往往依赖于主观评估。我们的目标是开发一个机器学习模型来预测48小时内ICU再入院情况,并将其性能与传统评分系统进行比较。方法:我们开发了一个集成模型iREAD,该模型使用首尔国立大学医院(SNUH)的数据,在ICU出院时生成概率评分,代表患者在48小时内再次入住ICU的可能性,并使用MIMIC-III和eICU-CRD数据集进行验证。2007年9月至2021年8月,SNUH共纳入70,842例患者。MIMIC-III数据集包括2001年至2012年在贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心入住ICU的43,237名患者,eICU-CRD数据集包括2014年至2015年在208家医院入住ICU的90,271名患者。年龄小于18岁的患者、在icu中死亡的患者或拒绝生命维持治疗的患者被排除在最终分析之外。使用接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型的性能,并与传统分数和传统机器学习模型进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较高危组和低危组的结果。研究结果:我们开发了iREAD,它利用了30个输入特征,包括人口统计、住院时间、生命体征、GCS和实验室值。与其他模型相比,iREAD在所有队列(均为48小时)和总体ICU再入院率方面分别表现出优越的性能。MIMIC-III和eICU-CRD的外部验证也显示出适度的性能,MIMIC-III和eICU-CRD的总体再入院auroc分别为0.768(0.748-0.787)和0.725(0.712-0.739),与其他模型相比表现出优越的性能(所有P解释:在内部和外部验证中,与传统评分系统或传统机器学习模型相比,iREAD在预测出院后48小时内ICU再入院方面表现出色。虽然在外部验证中观察到的性能下降表明需要对不同患者群体进行进一步的前瞻性验证,但强大的性能和识别高风险患者的能力有可能指导临床决策。本工作由韩国健康技术研究与开发项目通过韩国健康产业发展研究所支持,由大韩民国卫生和福利部资助(批准号RS-2021-KH114109)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge.

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission is a crucial indicator of patient safety. However, discharge decisions often rely on subjective assessment due to a lack of standardized guidelines. We aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict ICU readmission within 48 h and compare its performance to traditional scoring systems.

Methods: We developed an ensemble model, iREAD, that generates a probability score at ICU discharge, representing the likelihood of the patient being readmitted to the ICU within 48 h, using data from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) and validated it using the MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD datasets. From September 2007 to August 2021, a total of 70,842 patients were included from SNUH. The MIMIC-III datasets comprised 43,237 patients admitted to ICUs between 2001 and 2012 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the eICU-CRD datasets included 90,271 ICU admissions across 208 hospitals between 2014 and 2015. Patients younger than 18, those who died in ICUs, or who refused life-sustaining treatment were excluded from the final analysis. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared to the traditional scores and conventional machine learning models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the high-risk and low-risk groups.

Findings: We developed the iREAD, that utilized 30 input features, encompassing demographics, length of stay, vital signs, GCS, and laboratory values. iREAD demonstrated superior performance compared with other models across all cohorts (all P < 0.001). In the internal validation, iREAD achieved AUROCs of 0.771 (95% CI 0.743-0.798), 0.834 (0.821-0.846), and 0.820 (0.808-0.832) for early (≤48 h), late (>48 h), and overall ICU readmissions, respectively. External validations with MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD also showed modest performance with AUROCs of 0.768 (0.748-0.787) and 0.725 (0.712-0.739) for overall readmission in MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD respectively, demonstrating superior performance compared to other models (All P < 0.001; higher than other models). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that over 40% of high-risk patients predicted by iREAD were readmitted within 48 h, representing a more than four-fold increase in predictive performance compared to the traditional scores.

Interpretation: iREAD demonstrates superior performance in predicting ICU readmission within 48 h after discharge compared to traditional scoring systems or conventional machine learning models in both internal and external validations. While the performance degradation observed in the external validations suggests the need for further prospective validation on diverse patient populations, the robust performance and ability to identify high-risk patients have the potential to guide clinical decision-making.

Funding: This work was supported by the Korea Health Technology Research & Development Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number RS-2021-KH114109).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信