非转移性乳腺癌的辅助内分泌治疗策略:网络荟萃分析。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116
Andri Papakonstantinou, Guillermo Villacampa, Victor Navarro, Mafalda Oliveira, Antonios Valachis, Tomas Pascual, Alexios Matikas
{"title":"非转移性乳腺癌的辅助内分泌治疗策略:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Andri Papakonstantinou, Guillermo Villacampa, Victor Navarro, Mafalda Oliveira, Antonios Valachis, Tomas Pascual, Alexios Matikas","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103116"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant endocrine treatment strategies for non-metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andri Papakonstantinou, Guillermo Villacampa, Victor Navarro, Mafalda Oliveira, Antonios Valachis, Tomas Pascual, Alexios Matikas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"103116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项试验已经评估了早期乳腺癌内分泌治疗的升级策略,包括绝经前患者的卵巢功能抑制(OFS)和芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)以及扩展内分泌治疗。然而,由于研究设计的异质性和缺乏相关亚组的统计能力,几个方面仍然存在争议。我们旨在探讨最佳的内分泌治疗策略。方法:进行系统文献检索,并于2024年8月更新,以确定评估激素受体阳性乳腺癌内分泌治疗策略的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用随机效应模型,采用频率论框架进行网络元分析,汇集直接和间接证据。此外,还进行了提取的个体患者数据荟萃分析,以估计治疗之间的绝对差异。研究终点为无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42023447979。研究结果:共纳入37项随机对照试验,共纳入107,684例患者。在前5年,OFS + AI策略在绝经前妇女中最有效,而AI或转换策略在绝经后妇女中疗效更好。在他莫昔芬治疗5年后,与没有延长治疗(78.1%)或他莫昔芬治疗5年(81.0%)相比,继续增加5年AI治疗与8年DFS的改善(85.8%)相关。经过5年人工智能或转换策略后,延长人工智能治疗可改善DFS(风险比= 0.81,95%可信区间0.73-0.90)。解释:本研究为切除的激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者提供了最佳的内分泌治疗策略。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant endocrine treatment strategies for non-metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Background: Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979.

Findings: A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90).

Interpretation: This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信