延长撑开手术时间间隔的EOS患者生长棒手术的并发症和曲线进展:中国的一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jianqiang Wang, Haoshuang Geng, Lijin Zhou, Yong Hai
{"title":"延长撑开手术时间间隔的EOS患者生长棒手术的并发症和曲线进展:中国的一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jianqiang Wang, Haoshuang Geng, Lijin Zhou, Yong Hai","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the relationship between the rod-lengthening interval and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as the outcomes in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergoing growing rod surgery.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>EOS is characterized by a spinal deformity that manifests before the age of 10 years. The growing rod technique allows for spinal curvature correction while preserving spinal growth through periodic lengthening surgeries typically performed every 6 months. However, we found that due to challenges, many patients undergo a 1-year or even longer interval between lengthening surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 59 patients with EOS who underwent growing rod surgery at our institution between August 2012 and June 2022. We collected radiographic parameters to compare the differences in outcomes and complications between patients who underwent lengthening surgeries at intervals of 12 months versus those with intervals of >12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we found 29 complications in 59 patients. The complication rate was significantly lower in the group with lengthening intervals of 12 months compared with the group with intervals longer than 12 months (35.3% vs. 68%, p <0.05). In addition, patients in the group with intervals of 12 months showed less progression of the main curve, a lower maximum kyphosis angle, and greater increases in height in the fixed segments (d=7.53±3.69 cm, p <0.05). In contrast, patients with lengthening intervals longer than 12 months were more likely to experience sagittal plane imbalance (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lengthening intervals of greater than 12 months have a higher rate of complications and increase the risk of curve progression and spinal imbalance. Increasing the interval time just to minimize the number of surgeries before the final fusion is unwise.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications and curve progression in EOS patients with extended distraction surgery intervals in growing rod surgery: a retrospective cohort study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Jianqiang Wang, Haoshuang Geng, Lijin Zhou, Yong Hai\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the relationship between the rod-lengthening interval and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as the outcomes in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergoing growing rod surgery.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>EOS is characterized by a spinal deformity that manifests before the age of 10 years. The growing rod technique allows for spinal curvature correction while preserving spinal growth through periodic lengthening surgeries typically performed every 6 months. However, we found that due to challenges, many patients undergo a 1-year or even longer interval between lengthening surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 59 patients with EOS who underwent growing rod surgery at our institution between August 2012 and June 2022. We collected radiographic parameters to compare the differences in outcomes and complications between patients who underwent lengthening surgeries at intervals of 12 months versus those with intervals of >12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we found 29 complications in 59 patients. The complication rate was significantly lower in the group with lengthening intervals of 12 months compared with the group with intervals longer than 12 months (35.3% vs. 68%, p <0.05). In addition, patients in the group with intervals of 12 months showed less progression of the main curve, a lower maximum kyphosis angle, and greater increases in height in the fixed segments (d=7.53±3.69 cm, p <0.05). In contrast, patients with lengthening intervals longer than 12 months were more likely to experience sagittal plane imbalance (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lengthening intervals of greater than 12 months have a higher rate of complications and increase the risk of curve progression and spinal imbalance. Increasing the interval time just to minimize the number of surgeries before the final fusion is unwise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性病例对照研究。目的:本研究旨在探讨早发型脊柱侧凸(EOS)患者行生长杆手术时,生长杆延长间隔与术后并发症发生率及预后的关系。文献综述:EOS的特点是脊柱畸形,表现在10岁之前。生长棒技术允许脊柱弯曲矫正,同时通过通常每6个月进行的定期延长手术保持脊柱生长。然而,我们发现,由于挑战,许多患者经历1年甚至更长时间的延长手术间隔。方法:我们对2012年8月至2022年6月在我院接受生长棒手术的59例EOS患者进行了回顾性分析。我们收集影像学参数,比较每隔12个月接受延长手术的患者与每隔10 ~ 12个月接受延长手术的患者在预后和并发症方面的差异。结果:本组59例患者共发现29例并发症。术后12个月延长组并发症发生率明显低于术后12个月延长组(35.3% vs. 68%, p)。结论:术后12个月以上延长组并发症发生率高,脊柱弯曲进展和脊柱不平衡风险增加。为了减少最终融合前的手术次数而增加间隔时间是不明智的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complications and curve progression in EOS patients with extended distraction surgery intervals in growing rod surgery: a retrospective cohort study in China.

Study design: Retrospective case-control study.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the relationship between the rod-lengthening interval and the incidence of postoperative complications as well as the outcomes in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergoing growing rod surgery.

Overview of literature: EOS is characterized by a spinal deformity that manifests before the age of 10 years. The growing rod technique allows for spinal curvature correction while preserving spinal growth through periodic lengthening surgeries typically performed every 6 months. However, we found that due to challenges, many patients undergo a 1-year or even longer interval between lengthening surgeries.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 59 patients with EOS who underwent growing rod surgery at our institution between August 2012 and June 2022. We collected radiographic parameters to compare the differences in outcomes and complications between patients who underwent lengthening surgeries at intervals of 12 months versus those with intervals of >12 months.

Results: In this study, we found 29 complications in 59 patients. The complication rate was significantly lower in the group with lengthening intervals of 12 months compared with the group with intervals longer than 12 months (35.3% vs. 68%, p <0.05). In addition, patients in the group with intervals of 12 months showed less progression of the main curve, a lower maximum kyphosis angle, and greater increases in height in the fixed segments (d=7.53±3.69 cm, p <0.05). In contrast, patients with lengthening intervals longer than 12 months were more likely to experience sagittal plane imbalance (p <0.05).

Conclusions: Lengthening intervals of greater than 12 months have a higher rate of complications and increase the risk of curve progression and spinal imbalance. Increasing the interval time just to minimize the number of surgeries before the final fusion is unwise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信