{"title":"使用计算机断层扫描比较正常椎弓根轨迹、皮质骨轨迹和改良皮质骨轨迹的骨密度:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Bikash Parajuli, Dipak Shrestha, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Sabik Kayastha, Jagadish Thapa, Sanjay Sharma, Suman Lamichhane, Christian Deininger","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare bone density by computed tomography Hounsfield unit (CTHU) between the original pedicle trajectory (OPT), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The significant pullout strength in CBT is believed to be due to increased screw-cortical bone contact; however, it allows for shorter/less-diameter screw placement, and the fixation is limited to the posterior one-third of the vertebral body, compromising the screw anchorage in the anterior vertebra.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography transverse sections of the L1-L5 (1,000 vertebrae) of 200 patients were cut into three planes: (1) horizontal to the pedicle, representing the plane for OPT; (2) in the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and divergent in the transverse plane representing the CBT; and (3) the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and parallel in the transverse plane representing the MCBT. For each trajectory, the CTHU of four points, namely, posterior cortex, mid-pedicle, midbody, and anterior cortex, were compared within the area of screw insertion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean CTHUs of OPT, CBT, and MCBT were 354.2±70 HU, 529.9±75 HU, and 457.3±90 HU, respectively (p <0.01). The CTHU of the posterior cortex in MCBT was 65.6% higher than that in OPT and 14.9% lower than that in CBT. A comparable decline in CTHU with age was noted in CBT and MCBT (Pearson's r : -0.20 vs. -0.22; adjusted R 2: 0.040 vs. 0.047). However, a higher decline in CTHU with age was observed in OPT (Pearson's r =-0.38, adjusted R 2=0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCBT has a significantly higher CTHU than OPT. The density in the posterior cortex in MCBT is comparable to that in the CBT trajectory. MCBT appears to be an alternative trajectory for lumbar spine fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone density comparison between the normal pedicle trajectory, cortical bone trajectory, and modified cortical bone trajectory using computed tomography: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Bikash Parajuli, Dipak Shrestha, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Sabik Kayastha, Jagadish Thapa, Sanjay Sharma, Suman Lamichhane, Christian Deininger\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare bone density by computed tomography Hounsfield unit (CTHU) between the original pedicle trajectory (OPT), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The significant pullout strength in CBT is believed to be due to increased screw-cortical bone contact; however, it allows for shorter/less-diameter screw placement, and the fixation is limited to the posterior one-third of the vertebral body, compromising the screw anchorage in the anterior vertebra.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography transverse sections of the L1-L5 (1,000 vertebrae) of 200 patients were cut into three planes: (1) horizontal to the pedicle, representing the plane for OPT; (2) in the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and divergent in the transverse plane representing the CBT; and (3) the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and parallel in the transverse plane representing the MCBT. For each trajectory, the CTHU of four points, namely, posterior cortex, mid-pedicle, midbody, and anterior cortex, were compared within the area of screw insertion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean CTHUs of OPT, CBT, and MCBT were 354.2±70 HU, 529.9±75 HU, and 457.3±90 HU, respectively (p <0.01). The CTHU of the posterior cortex in MCBT was 65.6% higher than that in OPT and 14.9% lower than that in CBT. A comparable decline in CTHU with age was noted in CBT and MCBT (Pearson's r : -0.20 vs. -0.22; adjusted R 2: 0.040 vs. 0.047). However, a higher decline in CTHU with age was observed in OPT (Pearson's r =-0.38, adjusted R 2=0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCBT has a significantly higher CTHU than OPT. The density in the posterior cortex in MCBT is comparable to that in the CBT trajectory. MCBT appears to be an alternative trajectory for lumbar spine fixation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:横断面研究。目的:通过计算机断层扫描Hounsfield单位(CTHU)比较原始椎弓根轨迹(OPT)、皮质骨轨迹(CBT)和改良皮质骨轨迹(MCBT)的骨密度。文献综述:CBT中显著的拔牙强度被认为是由于螺钉-皮质骨接触增加所致;然而,它允许更短/更小直径的螺钉置入,并且固定仅限于椎体的后三分之一,损害了前椎体的螺钉锚固。方法:将200例患者的L1-L5(1000块椎骨)的ct横切面切成3个平面:(1)与椎弓根水平,代表OPT平面;(2)尾颅面矢状面发散,横切面发散,代表CBT;(3)矢状面为尾颅面,横切面平行,代表MCBT。对每条轨迹,比较螺钉置入区域内后皮质、椎弓根中部、椎体中部和前皮质四个点的CTHU。结果:OPT、CBT和MCBT的平均CTHU分别为354.2±70 HU、529.9±75 HU和457.3±90 HU (p)。结论:MCBT的CTHU明显高于OPT, MCBT的后皮质密度与CBT相当。MCBT似乎是腰椎固定的另一种选择。
Bone density comparison between the normal pedicle trajectory, cortical bone trajectory, and modified cortical bone trajectory using computed tomography: a cross-sectional study.
Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Purpose: To compare bone density by computed tomography Hounsfield unit (CTHU) between the original pedicle trajectory (OPT), cortical bone trajectory (CBT), and modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT).
Overview of literature: The significant pullout strength in CBT is believed to be due to increased screw-cortical bone contact; however, it allows for shorter/less-diameter screw placement, and the fixation is limited to the posterior one-third of the vertebral body, compromising the screw anchorage in the anterior vertebra.
Methods: Computed tomography transverse sections of the L1-L5 (1,000 vertebrae) of 200 patients were cut into three planes: (1) horizontal to the pedicle, representing the plane for OPT; (2) in the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and divergent in the transverse plane representing the CBT; and (3) the caudocranial plane in the sagittal plane and parallel in the transverse plane representing the MCBT. For each trajectory, the CTHU of four points, namely, posterior cortex, mid-pedicle, midbody, and anterior cortex, were compared within the area of screw insertion.
Results: The mean CTHUs of OPT, CBT, and MCBT were 354.2±70 HU, 529.9±75 HU, and 457.3±90 HU, respectively (p <0.01). The CTHU of the posterior cortex in MCBT was 65.6% higher than that in OPT and 14.9% lower than that in CBT. A comparable decline in CTHU with age was noted in CBT and MCBT (Pearson's r : -0.20 vs. -0.22; adjusted R 2: 0.040 vs. 0.047). However, a higher decline in CTHU with age was observed in OPT (Pearson's r =-0.38, adjusted R 2=0.14).
Conclusions: MCBT has a significantly higher CTHU than OPT. The density in the posterior cortex in MCBT is comparable to that in the CBT trajectory. MCBT appears to be an alternative trajectory for lumbar spine fixation.