Benedicte Grøngaard Madsen, Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya, Gustav Borghegn Blak Christensen, Johan Heiberg, Mette Krag
{"title":"鼻气管插管中导管和设备选择的影响:一项范围审查方案。","authors":"Benedicte Grøngaard Madsen, Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya, Gustav Borghegn Blak Christensen, Johan Heiberg, Mette Krag","doi":"10.1111/aas.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasotracheal intubation is commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgeries due to its improved access to the surgical field. However, the technique can lead to complications like epistaxis and mucosal injuries. The choice of tube and other equipment may impact patient outcomes. This review aims to explore how different tubes and equipment affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement, we plan to carry out a scoping review of studies examining the impact of different tubes and equipment on patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation in adults. We will assess study design, population, type of tube and equipment, and patient outcomes across the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We plan to provide descriptive analyses of the included studies accompanied by tabulated results to summarize key findings and identify patterns in the data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will summarize the existing evidence on how tube and equipment choices affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of tube and equipment choice in nasotracheal intubation: Protocol for a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Benedicte Grøngaard Madsen, Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya, Gustav Borghegn Blak Christensen, Johan Heiberg, Mette Krag\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasotracheal intubation is commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgeries due to its improved access to the surgical field. However, the technique can lead to complications like epistaxis and mucosal injuries. The choice of tube and other equipment may impact patient outcomes. This review aims to explore how different tubes and equipment affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement, we plan to carry out a scoping review of studies examining the impact of different tubes and equipment on patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation in adults. We will assess study design, population, type of tube and equipment, and patient outcomes across the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We plan to provide descriptive analyses of the included studies accompanied by tabulated results to summarize key findings and identify patterns in the data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will summarize the existing evidence on how tube and equipment choices affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"e70013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of tube and equipment choice in nasotracheal intubation: Protocol for a scoping review.
Background: Nasotracheal intubation is commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgeries due to its improved access to the surgical field. However, the technique can lead to complications like epistaxis and mucosal injuries. The choice of tube and other equipment may impact patient outcomes. This review aims to explore how different tubes and equipment affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.
Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement, we plan to carry out a scoping review of studies examining the impact of different tubes and equipment on patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation in adults. We will assess study design, population, type of tube and equipment, and patient outcomes across the included studies.
Results: We plan to provide descriptive analyses of the included studies accompanied by tabulated results to summarize key findings and identify patterns in the data.
Conclusion: This scoping review will summarize the existing evidence on how tube and equipment choices affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.
期刊介绍:
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.