Vaishali Dulobdas, Amy A. Kirkwood, Fabio Serpenti, Brijesh Gautama, Aikaterini Panopoulou, Amrith Mathew, Sumantha Gabriel, Ram Malladi, Jessica Pealing, Denise Bonney, Emma Nicholson, Caroline Besley, Sara Ghorashian, Andrea Kuhnl, Elizabeth Davies, Jackie Chappell, Anne Black, Tobias Menne, Maeve A. O’Reilly, Robin Sanderson, Sridhar Chaganti
{"title":"大b细胞淋巴瘤CAR - T细胞制造失败和患者预后的危险因素:来自英国国家CAR - T专家组的报告","authors":"Vaishali Dulobdas, Amy A. Kirkwood, Fabio Serpenti, Brijesh Gautama, Aikaterini Panopoulou, Amrith Mathew, Sumantha Gabriel, Ram Malladi, Jessica Pealing, Denise Bonney, Emma Nicholson, Caroline Besley, Sara Ghorashian, Andrea Kuhnl, Elizabeth Davies, Jackie Chappell, Anne Black, Tobias Menne, Maeve A. O’Reilly, Robin Sanderson, Sridhar Chaganti","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01225-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>CAR T-cell manufacturing failure (MF) is a situation where the manufacturing process fails to yield a product or results in one which is out-of-specification (OOS). We conducted a multicentre retrospective review of factors contributing to MF and patient outcomes. Of 981 large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients approved for CAR T-cell therapy, 38 (3.87%) had MF. Eleven patients received delayed infusion with a product in-specification (delayed-infused) following 21 remanufacturing attempts. OOS product was infused in 13 (OOS-infused), and 14 were not infused. For comparison, we included 38 LBCL controls without MF; 29 received infusion (controls-infused). Prior bendamustine was the only baseline variable associated with MF risk, largely due to therapy within 6 months; 23.7% MF vs 0% controls (<i>P</i> = 0.0029). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly different for infused patients, with 1-year OS (PFS) of 52.8% (46.2%), 46.8% (24.2%) and 68.4% (41.4%) for OOS-infused, delayed-infused and controls-infused respectively (PFS HR OOS-infused vs controls-infused 1.41, <i>P</i> = 0.40; delayed-infused vs controls-infused 1.64, <i>P</i> = 0.25; and OOS-infused vs delayed-infused 0.86, <i>P</i> = 0.76). CRS, ICANS and cytopenias were not significantly different between cohorts. Outcomes for OOS-infused LBCL patients following MF are encouraging. Remanufacturing led to infusion of a product in-specification in around 50% and may be an option for patients where a suitable OOS product is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for CAR T-cell manufacturing failure and patient outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma: a report from the UK National CAR T Panel\",\"authors\":\"Vaishali Dulobdas, Amy A. Kirkwood, Fabio Serpenti, Brijesh Gautama, Aikaterini Panopoulou, Amrith Mathew, Sumantha Gabriel, Ram Malladi, Jessica Pealing, Denise Bonney, Emma Nicholson, Caroline Besley, Sara Ghorashian, Andrea Kuhnl, Elizabeth Davies, Jackie Chappell, Anne Black, Tobias Menne, Maeve A. O’Reilly, Robin Sanderson, Sridhar Chaganti\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-025-01225-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>CAR T-cell manufacturing failure (MF) is a situation where the manufacturing process fails to yield a product or results in one which is out-of-specification (OOS). We conducted a multicentre retrospective review of factors contributing to MF and patient outcomes. Of 981 large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients approved for CAR T-cell therapy, 38 (3.87%) had MF. Eleven patients received delayed infusion with a product in-specification (delayed-infused) following 21 remanufacturing attempts. OOS product was infused in 13 (OOS-infused), and 14 were not infused. For comparison, we included 38 LBCL controls without MF; 29 received infusion (controls-infused). Prior bendamustine was the only baseline variable associated with MF risk, largely due to therapy within 6 months; 23.7% MF vs 0% controls (<i>P</i> = 0.0029). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly different for infused patients, with 1-year OS (PFS) of 52.8% (46.2%), 46.8% (24.2%) and 68.4% (41.4%) for OOS-infused, delayed-infused and controls-infused respectively (PFS HR OOS-infused vs controls-infused 1.41, <i>P</i> = 0.40; delayed-infused vs controls-infused 1.64, <i>P</i> = 0.25; and OOS-infused vs delayed-infused 0.86, <i>P</i> = 0.76). CRS, ICANS and cytopenias were not significantly different between cohorts. Outcomes for OOS-infused LBCL patients following MF are encouraging. Remanufacturing led to infusion of a product in-specification in around 50% and may be an option for patients where a suitable OOS product is not available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01225-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01225-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CAR - t细胞生产失败(MF)是指生产过程未能生产出产品或导致产品不符合规格(OOS)的情况。我们对MF和患者预后的影响因素进行了多中心回顾性研究。在981例获准接受CAR - t细胞治疗的大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中,38例(3.87%)患有MF。11名患者在21次再制造尝试后接受了延期输注符合规格的产品(延期输注)。13例输注OOS产品,14例未输注OOS产品。为了进行比较,我们纳入了38例无MF的LBCL对照组;29例接受输注(对照组)。先前的苯达莫司汀是唯一与MF风险相关的基线变量,主要是由于6个月内的治疗;23.7% MF vs 0%对照(P = 0.0029)。输注患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)无显著差异,输注oos、延迟输注oos和对照组输注oos的1年生存率(PFS)分别为52.8%(46.2%)、46.8%(24.2%)和68.4%(41.4%)(输注oos vs输注对照组PFS HR 1.41, P = 0.40;延迟输注组vs对照组输注组1.64,P = 0.25;oos输注vs延迟输注0.86,P = 0.76)。CRS、ICANS和血细胞减少在队列间无显著差异。MF后输注oos的LBCL患者的结果令人鼓舞。再制造导致输注符合规格的产品的比例约为50%,对于没有合适的OOS产品的患者来说,这可能是一种选择。
Risk factors for CAR T-cell manufacturing failure and patient outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma: a report from the UK National CAR T Panel
CAR T-cell manufacturing failure (MF) is a situation where the manufacturing process fails to yield a product or results in one which is out-of-specification (OOS). We conducted a multicentre retrospective review of factors contributing to MF and patient outcomes. Of 981 large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients approved for CAR T-cell therapy, 38 (3.87%) had MF. Eleven patients received delayed infusion with a product in-specification (delayed-infused) following 21 remanufacturing attempts. OOS product was infused in 13 (OOS-infused), and 14 were not infused. For comparison, we included 38 LBCL controls without MF; 29 received infusion (controls-infused). Prior bendamustine was the only baseline variable associated with MF risk, largely due to therapy within 6 months; 23.7% MF vs 0% controls (P = 0.0029). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly different for infused patients, with 1-year OS (PFS) of 52.8% (46.2%), 46.8% (24.2%) and 68.4% (41.4%) for OOS-infused, delayed-infused and controls-infused respectively (PFS HR OOS-infused vs controls-infused 1.41, P = 0.40; delayed-infused vs controls-infused 1.64, P = 0.25; and OOS-infused vs delayed-infused 0.86, P = 0.76). CRS, ICANS and cytopenias were not significantly different between cohorts. Outcomes for OOS-infused LBCL patients following MF are encouraging. Remanufacturing led to infusion of a product in-specification in around 50% and may be an option for patients where a suitable OOS product is not available.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.