Brenda Agyeiwaa Poku, Lucy Hunt, Alison Pilnick, Karl Michael Atkin, Catrin Evans, Emily Pulsford, Susan Kirk
{"title":"处于慢性病和移徙交叉点的儿童和青年:范围审查。","authors":"Brenda Agyeiwaa Poku, Lucy Hunt, Alison Pilnick, Karl Michael Atkin, Catrin Evans, Emily Pulsford, Susan Kirk","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00131-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic illnesses (CIs) are increasingly prevalent among children/young people (CYP) globally. For migrant CYP with CIs, achieving a stable life in a new country can be particularly challenging due to additional barriers such as cultural and language differences, unsafe living conditions, and discrimination. While migration can sometimes improve healthcare access by introducing new models of care and ways of understanding health, these advantages are often outweighed by obstacles that hinder access to essential services. This review aimed to map the global evidence on post-migration experiences and outcomes of CYP with CIs and to identify priorities for research, policy, and practice to improve their care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines. We searched seven online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Social Science Collection, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. Data were synthesised using a socio-ecological model, and four young migrants living with sickle cell disease in the UK contributed to the review through a Patient and Public Involvement Advisory Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 included papers, most focused on migration to high-income countries, particularly the USA, and used institutional records or case studies. Few studies provided detailed information about migration status or reason for migration, often using proxies like parental country of birth or language spoken. The socio-ecological model revealed disparities in health status, treatment access, and health outcomes for migrant CYP with CIs. Key challenges were language, communication, costs, bureaucracy, family dynamics, coordination issues, resource constraints, and socio-political influences. Significant gaps included a lack of intersectional analyses (e.g. accounting for 'race' and citizenship) and limited qualitative research capturing the lived experiences of migrant CYP with CIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Migrant CYP with CIs face significant health disparities shaped by individual, social, and systemic factors. Addressing these challenges requires intersectional and qualitative research, alongside collaboration with policymakers, practitioners, and communities, to inform more equitable healthcare policies and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children and young people at the intersection of chronic illness and migration: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Agyeiwaa Poku, Lucy Hunt, Alison Pilnick, Karl Michael Atkin, Catrin Evans, Emily Pulsford, Susan Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-025-00131-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic illnesses (CIs) are increasingly prevalent among children/young people (CYP) globally. For migrant CYP with CIs, achieving a stable life in a new country can be particularly challenging due to additional barriers such as cultural and language differences, unsafe living conditions, and discrimination. While migration can sometimes improve healthcare access by introducing new models of care and ways of understanding health, these advantages are often outweighed by obstacles that hinder access to essential services. This review aimed to map the global evidence on post-migration experiences and outcomes of CYP with CIs and to identify priorities for research, policy, and practice to improve their care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines. We searched seven online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Social Science Collection, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. Data were synthesised using a socio-ecological model, and four young migrants living with sickle cell disease in the UK contributed to the review through a Patient and Public Involvement Advisory Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 included papers, most focused on migration to high-income countries, particularly the USA, and used institutional records or case studies. Few studies provided detailed information about migration status or reason for migration, often using proxies like parental country of birth or language spoken. The socio-ecological model revealed disparities in health status, treatment access, and health outcomes for migrant CYP with CIs. Key challenges were language, communication, costs, bureaucracy, family dynamics, coordination issues, resource constraints, and socio-political influences. Significant gaps included a lack of intersectional analyses (e.g. accounting for 'race' and citizenship) and limited qualitative research capturing the lived experiences of migrant CYP with CIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Migrant CYP with CIs face significant health disparities shaped by individual, social, and systemic factors. Addressing these challenges requires intersectional and qualitative research, alongside collaboration with policymakers, practitioners, and communities, to inform more equitable healthcare policies and practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00131-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00131-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性疾病(CIs)在全球儿童/年轻人(CYP)中越来越普遍。对于有CIs的移民CYP来说,由于文化和语言差异、不安全的生活条件和歧视等额外障碍,在一个新的国家实现稳定的生活可能特别具有挑战性。虽然移徙有时可以通过引入新的护理模式和理解健康的方式来改善获得保健服务的机会,但这些优势往往被阻碍获得基本服务的障碍所抵消。本综述的目的是绘制全球关于移民后CYP的经验和结果的证据,并确定研究、政策和实践的重点,以改善他们的护理。方法:根据JBI指南进行范围审查。截至2024年2月,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Social Science Collection和Web of Science等7个在线数据库。使用社会生态模型对数据进行了综合,四名在英国患有镰状细胞病的年轻移民通过患者和公众参与咨询小组对审查做出了贡献。结果:在纳入的58篇论文中,大多数关注的是向高收入国家(尤其是美国)的移民,并使用了机构记录或案例研究。很少有研究提供有关移民状况或移民原因的详细信息,通常使用父母出生国或语言等代理。社会生态模型揭示了CIs移民CYP在健康状况、治疗可及性和健康结果方面的差异。主要的挑战是语言、沟通、成本、官僚主义、家庭动态、协调问题、资源限制和社会政治影响。重要的差距包括缺乏交叉分析(例如,考虑“种族”和公民身份)和有限的定性研究,这些研究捕捉了具有CIs的移民CYP的生活经历。结论:移民CYP与CIs面临着由个人、社会和系统因素形成的显著健康差异。应对这些挑战需要交叉和定性研究,以及与政策制定者、从业者和社区的合作,以提供更公平的医疗保健政策和实践信息。
Children and young people at the intersection of chronic illness and migration: a scoping review.
Background: Chronic illnesses (CIs) are increasingly prevalent among children/young people (CYP) globally. For migrant CYP with CIs, achieving a stable life in a new country can be particularly challenging due to additional barriers such as cultural and language differences, unsafe living conditions, and discrimination. While migration can sometimes improve healthcare access by introducing new models of care and ways of understanding health, these advantages are often outweighed by obstacles that hinder access to essential services. This review aimed to map the global evidence on post-migration experiences and outcomes of CYP with CIs and to identify priorities for research, policy, and practice to improve their care.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines. We searched seven online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Social Science Collection, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. Data were synthesised using a socio-ecological model, and four young migrants living with sickle cell disease in the UK contributed to the review through a Patient and Public Involvement Advisory Group.
Results: Of the 58 included papers, most focused on migration to high-income countries, particularly the USA, and used institutional records or case studies. Few studies provided detailed information about migration status or reason for migration, often using proxies like parental country of birth or language spoken. The socio-ecological model revealed disparities in health status, treatment access, and health outcomes for migrant CYP with CIs. Key challenges were language, communication, costs, bureaucracy, family dynamics, coordination issues, resource constraints, and socio-political influences. Significant gaps included a lack of intersectional analyses (e.g. accounting for 'race' and citizenship) and limited qualitative research capturing the lived experiences of migrant CYP with CIs.
Conclusions: Migrant CYP with CIs face significant health disparities shaped by individual, social, and systemic factors. Addressing these challenges requires intersectional and qualitative research, alongside collaboration with policymakers, practitioners, and communities, to inform more equitable healthcare policies and practices.