含异丙酚的单药与联合方案:一项基于医院内窥镜套件的恢复指标和并发症发生率的回顾性队列研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Guozhen Xie , Maria Estevez , Kiyan Heybati , Matthew Vogt , Michael Smith , Christine Moshe , Johanna Chan , Vivek Kumbhari , Ryan Chadha
{"title":"含异丙酚的单药与联合方案:一项基于医院内窥镜套件的恢复指标和并发症发生率的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Guozhen Xie ,&nbsp;Maria Estevez ,&nbsp;Kiyan Heybati ,&nbsp;Matthew Vogt ,&nbsp;Michael Smith ,&nbsp;Christine Moshe ,&nbsp;Johanna Chan ,&nbsp;Vivek Kumbhari ,&nbsp;Ryan Chadha","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anesthesiologists are often tasked with overseeing sedation in non-surgical settings. We aim to determine whether adding adjuvant sedatives to propofol affects the recovery times and complication rates after endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18) who received propofol while undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or colonoscopy (COL) at a large academic institution over a four-year period. Patients receiving propofol alone were compared against patients receiving propofol in combination with midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was PACU length of stay, adjusted for age, sex, and ASA Score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 90%), bradycardia (HR &lt; 60 bpm), and escalation of care (hospital admission), reported in adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across the study period, 28,532 cases were included. Colonoscopies performed under propofol+fentanyl sedation were associated with significantly longer PACU LOS compared to propofol alone. Adjusted mean PACU LOS was significantly longer in patients receiving adjuvant fentanyl, compared to propofol alone (p &lt; 0.01) and propofol + dexmedetomidine (p &lt; 0.01). Patients receiving propofol alone exhibited a 9.4% incidence of bradycardia, 16.0% hypoxia, 0.89% PONV, and 0.40% hospitalization. Adjuvant fentanyl use was associated with higher odds of hypoxia across all procedure types (p &lt; 0.05). Adjuvant dexmedetomidine was associated with higher rates of bradycardia, but lower rates of hypoxia, PONV, and hospitalization (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>With the exception of fentanyl, combining propofol with other sedatives was not associated with longer recovery times. The incidence of complications differed significantly with the use of adjuvant fentanyl or dexmedetomidine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 2","pages":"Article 844602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-agent versus combination regimens containing propofol: a retrospective cohort study of recovery metrics and complication rates in a hospital-based endoscopy suite\",\"authors\":\"Guozhen Xie ,&nbsp;Maria Estevez ,&nbsp;Kiyan Heybati ,&nbsp;Matthew Vogt ,&nbsp;Michael Smith ,&nbsp;Christine Moshe ,&nbsp;Johanna Chan ,&nbsp;Vivek Kumbhari ,&nbsp;Ryan Chadha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anesthesiologists are often tasked with overseeing sedation in non-surgical settings. We aim to determine whether adding adjuvant sedatives to propofol affects the recovery times and complication rates after endoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18) who received propofol while undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or colonoscopy (COL) at a large academic institution over a four-year period. Patients receiving propofol alone were compared against patients receiving propofol in combination with midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was PACU length of stay, adjusted for age, sex, and ASA Score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 90%), bradycardia (HR &lt; 60 bpm), and escalation of care (hospital admission), reported in adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across the study period, 28,532 cases were included. Colonoscopies performed under propofol+fentanyl sedation were associated with significantly longer PACU LOS compared to propofol alone. Adjusted mean PACU LOS was significantly longer in patients receiving adjuvant fentanyl, compared to propofol alone (p &lt; 0.01) and propofol + dexmedetomidine (p &lt; 0.01). Patients receiving propofol alone exhibited a 9.4% incidence of bradycardia, 16.0% hypoxia, 0.89% PONV, and 0.40% hospitalization. Adjuvant fentanyl use was associated with higher odds of hypoxia across all procedure types (p &lt; 0.05). Adjuvant dexmedetomidine was associated with higher rates of bradycardia, but lower rates of hypoxia, PONV, and hospitalization (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>With the exception of fentanyl, combining propofol with other sedatives was not associated with longer recovery times. The incidence of complications differed significantly with the use of adjuvant fentanyl or dexmedetomidine.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 844602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉医师通常负责监督非手术环境下的镇静。我们的目的是确定在异丙酚中加入辅助镇静剂是否会影响内镜术后的恢复时间和并发症发生率。方法:我们对在一家大型学术机构接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和/或结肠镜检查(COL)并接受异丙酚治疗的成年人(≥18岁)进行了为期四年的回顾性队列研究。将单独使用异丙酚的患者与使用异丙酚联合咪达唑仑、芬太尼、氯胺酮或右美托咪定的患者进行比较。主要终点是PACU住院时间,根据年龄、性别和ASA评分进行调整。次要结局包括PACU术后恶心和呕吐、低氧血症(SpO2 < 90)、心动过缓(HR < 60)和护理升级(住院)的发生率,以调整后的优势比及其95%置信区间报告。结果:28532例纳入研究。与单独使用prop相比,在prop+支架下进行结肠镜检查可显著延长PACU LOS。与单独使用异丙酚(p < 0.01)和prop +右美托咪定(p < 0.01)相比,辅助使用芬太尼的患者调整后的平均PACU LOS明显更长。单独使用异丙酚的患者出现9.4%的心动过缓、16.0%的缺氧、0.89%的PONV和0.40%的住院。在所有手术类型中,芬太尼辅助使用与缺氧几率增加相关(p < 0.05)。辅助使用右美托咪定与心动过缓发生率升高相关,但与缺氧、PONV和住院率降低相关(p < 0.05)。结论:除芬太尼外,异丙酚与其他镇静剂联用与较长的恢复时间无关。使用芬太尼或右美托咪定辅助治疗的并发症发生率有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-agent versus combination regimens containing propofol: a retrospective cohort study of recovery metrics and complication rates in a hospital-based endoscopy suite

Background

Anesthesiologists are often tasked with overseeing sedation in non-surgical settings. We aim to determine whether adding adjuvant sedatives to propofol affects the recovery times and complication rates after endoscopy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18) who received propofol while undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or colonoscopy (COL) at a large academic institution over a four-year period. Patients receiving propofol alone were compared against patients receiving propofol in combination with midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was PACU length of stay, adjusted for age, sex, and ASA Score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of PACU postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%), bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm), and escalation of care (hospital admission), reported in adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Across the study period, 28,532 cases were included. Colonoscopies performed under propofol+fentanyl sedation were associated with significantly longer PACU LOS compared to propofol alone. Adjusted mean PACU LOS was significantly longer in patients receiving adjuvant fentanyl, compared to propofol alone (p < 0.01) and propofol + dexmedetomidine (p < 0.01). Patients receiving propofol alone exhibited a 9.4% incidence of bradycardia, 16.0% hypoxia, 0.89% PONV, and 0.40% hospitalization. Adjuvant fentanyl use was associated with higher odds of hypoxia across all procedure types (p < 0.05). Adjuvant dexmedetomidine was associated with higher rates of bradycardia, but lower rates of hypoxia, PONV, and hospitalization (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

With the exception of fentanyl, combining propofol with other sedatives was not associated with longer recovery times. The incidence of complications differed significantly with the use of adjuvant fentanyl or dexmedetomidine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信