肝脏手术患者全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gustavo R.M. Wegner , Bruno F.M. Wegner , Henrik G. Oliveira , Luis A. Costa , Luigi W. Spagnol , Valentine W. Spagnol , Jorge R.M. Carlotto , Eugénio Pagnussatt Neto
{"title":"肝脏手术患者全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gustavo R.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Bruno F.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Henrik G. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luis A. Costa ,&nbsp;Luigi W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Valentine W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Jorge R.M. Carlotto ,&nbsp;Eugénio Pagnussatt Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of choosing between inhalational anesthetics and propofol for maintenance anesthesia in liver transplantation or liver resections remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on September 5, 2023, adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen randomized controlled trials and five observational studies, comprising 1,602 patients, were included. The statistical analysis was categorized into three groups: liver transplantation (four studies), living donor hepatectomy (four studies), and liver mass hepatectomy (twelve studies). The liver mass hepatectomy group was further subdivided based on the performance of the Pringle maneuver and the use of pharmacological preconditioning. Statistically significant results are described below. In liver transplant recipients, propofol anesthesia was associated with lower AST levels on the first postoperative day. Hepatic donors anesthetized with propofol had higher total infusion volumes and intraoperative urine output. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher peak AST and ALT levels compared to those who received pharmacological preconditioning. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher AST and ALT levels on both the first and third postoperative days, increased total infusion volumes, and shorter hospital stays, when compared to pharmacological conditioning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings do not offer sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. The choice between propofol-based and inhalational anesthesia should be tailored to the individual patient's condition and the nature of the procedure being performed.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO ID: CRD42023460715.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 3","pages":"Article 844604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia in patients undergoing liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo R.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Bruno F.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Henrik G. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luis A. Costa ,&nbsp;Luigi W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Valentine W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Jorge R.M. Carlotto ,&nbsp;Eugénio Pagnussatt Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of choosing between inhalational anesthetics and propofol for maintenance anesthesia in liver transplantation or liver resections remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on September 5, 2023, adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen randomized controlled trials and five observational studies, comprising 1,602 patients, were included. The statistical analysis was categorized into three groups: liver transplantation (four studies), living donor hepatectomy (four studies), and liver mass hepatectomy (twelve studies). The liver mass hepatectomy group was further subdivided based on the performance of the Pringle maneuver and the use of pharmacological preconditioning. Statistically significant results are described below. In liver transplant recipients, propofol anesthesia was associated with lower AST levels on the first postoperative day. Hepatic donors anesthetized with propofol had higher total infusion volumes and intraoperative urine output. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher peak AST and ALT levels compared to those who received pharmacological preconditioning. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher AST and ALT levels on both the first and third postoperative days, increased total infusion volumes, and shorter hospital stays, when compared to pharmacological conditioning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings do not offer sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. The choice between propofol-based and inhalational anesthesia should be tailored to the individual patient's condition and the nature of the procedure being performed.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO ID: CRD42023460715.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 844604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S010400142500020X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S010400142500020X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia in patients undergoing liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The impact of choosing between inhalational anesthetics and propofol for maintenance anesthesia in liver transplantation or liver resections remains uncertain.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on September 5, 2023, adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and five observational studies, comprising 1,602 patients, were included. The statistical analysis was categorized into three groups: liver transplantation (four studies), living donor hepatectomy (four studies), and liver mass hepatectomy (twelve studies). The liver mass hepatectomy group was further subdivided based on the performance of the Pringle maneuver and the use of pharmacological preconditioning. Statistically significant results are described below. In liver transplant recipients, propofol anesthesia was associated with lower AST levels on the first postoperative day. Hepatic donors anesthetized with propofol had higher total infusion volumes and intraoperative urine output. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher peak AST and ALT levels compared to those who received pharmacological preconditioning. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher AST and ALT levels on both the first and third postoperative days, increased total infusion volumes, and shorter hospital stays, when compared to pharmacological conditioning.

Conclusions

Our findings do not offer sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. The choice between propofol-based and inhalational anesthesia should be tailored to the individual patient's condition and the nature of the procedure being performed.

Registration

PROSPERO ID: CRD42023460715.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信