在坦桑尼亚两个地区使用改进的工具进行“帮助婴儿呼吸”模拟训练后,医疗保健提供者获得新生儿复苏技能。

IF 4.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Vickfarajaeli Daudi, Robert Moshiro, Benjamin Kamala, Paschal Mdoe, Dunstan Bishanga, Hege Ersdal, Rose Mpembeni
{"title":"在坦桑尼亚两个地区使用改进的工具进行“帮助婴儿呼吸”模拟训练后,医疗保健提供者获得新生儿复苏技能。","authors":"Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Vickfarajaeli Daudi, Robert Moshiro, Benjamin Kamala, Paschal Mdoe, Dunstan Bishanga, Hege Ersdal, Rose Mpembeni","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal mortality is high in middle- and low-income countries, including Tanzania. Most of these deaths are preventable and linked to suboptimal quality of care. In this study, we assessed neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition after a 1-day Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) simulation training using improved tools and associated factors among healthcare providers in 12 facilities in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare providers working in the labor wards in selected health facilities. The training was conducted in situ using the HBB second edition curriculum with improved simulation tools (Neonatalie Live simulator, NeoBeat heart rate meter, and Upright resuscitator). After training, skills acquisition was evaluated using Objectively Structured Clinical Evaluation. Participants who scored an average of 75% or above were considered passing. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of staff who passed the evaluation by different demographic categories. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores among demographic categories. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition were analyzed using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 481 participants were enrolled in the study. Among these, 420 (87.3%) passed the skills evaluation on the first attempt. The overall mean skills score was 92.4%. In bivariable analysis, health facility level, region, age, and experience working in the labor ward were associated with passing skills evaluation on the first attempt. However, after controlling other variables in a multivariable model, none of the factors showed a statistically significant association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-situ, HBB simulation training using improved training tools effectively imparts neonatal resuscitation skills among healthcare providers. Participants learned skills similarly regardless of their different demographic characteristics, including level of education and working experience. Due to its potential to impart skills, frequent simulation training using improved tools may be considered for scaling up in other health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition among healthcare providers after Helping Babies Breathe simulation training using improved tools across two regions in Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Vickfarajaeli Daudi, Robert Moshiro, Benjamin Kamala, Paschal Mdoe, Dunstan Bishanga, Hege Ersdal, Rose Mpembeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal mortality is high in middle- and low-income countries, including Tanzania. Most of these deaths are preventable and linked to suboptimal quality of care. In this study, we assessed neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition after a 1-day Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) simulation training using improved tools and associated factors among healthcare providers in 12 facilities in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare providers working in the labor wards in selected health facilities. The training was conducted in situ using the HBB second edition curriculum with improved simulation tools (Neonatalie Live simulator, NeoBeat heart rate meter, and Upright resuscitator). After training, skills acquisition was evaluated using Objectively Structured Clinical Evaluation. Participants who scored an average of 75% or above were considered passing. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of staff who passed the evaluation by different demographic categories. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores among demographic categories. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition were analyzed using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 481 participants were enrolled in the study. Among these, 420 (87.3%) passed the skills evaluation on the first attempt. The overall mean skills score was 92.4%. In bivariable analysis, health facility level, region, age, and experience working in the labor ward were associated with passing skills evaluation on the first attempt. However, after controlling other variables in a multivariable model, none of the factors showed a statistically significant association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-situ, HBB simulation training using improved training tools effectively imparts neonatal resuscitation skills among healthcare providers. Participants learned skills similarly regardless of their different demographic characteristics, including level of education and working experience. Due to its potential to impart skills, frequent simulation training using improved tools may be considered for scaling up in other health facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00338-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在包括坦桑尼亚在内的中低收入国家,新生儿死亡率很高。这些死亡大多是可以预防的,并与护理质量欠佳有关。在这项研究中,我们评估了坦桑尼亚12个医疗机构的医疗服务提供者在进行为期1天的帮助婴儿呼吸(HBB)模拟训练后,使用改进的工具和相关因素获得的新生儿复苏技能。方法:在选定的卫生机构的产房工作的卫生保健提供者中进行横断面研究。培训在现场进行,使用HBB第二版课程和改进的模拟工具(Neonatalie Live模拟器,NeoBeat心率计和直立复苏器)。训练结束后,采用客观结构化临床评估法对技能习得进行评估。平均得分在75%或以上的参与者被认为是合格的。使用描述性统计来确定通过不同人口类别评价的工作人员的比例。采用单因素方差分析比较人口学分类的平均得分。采用修正泊松回归分析与新生儿复苏技能习得相关的因素。结果:共有481名参与者被纳入研究。其中,420人(87.3%)一次通过技能评估。总体平均技能得分为92.4%。在双变量分析中,卫生设施水平、地区、年龄和在产房工作的经验与第一次通过技能评估相关。然而,在多变量模型中控制了其他变量后,没有一个因素显示出统计学上显著的关联。结论:现场,HBB模拟培训使用改进的培训工具有效地传授新生儿复苏技能的医护人员。不管参与者的人口特征不同,包括教育水平和工作经验,他们学习的技能都是相似的。由于具有传授技能的潜力,可以考虑使用改进的工具进行频繁的模拟培训,以便在其他卫生设施中推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition among healthcare providers after Helping Babies Breathe simulation training using improved tools across two regions in Tanzania.

Introduction: Neonatal mortality is high in middle- and low-income countries, including Tanzania. Most of these deaths are preventable and linked to suboptimal quality of care. In this study, we assessed neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition after a 1-day Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) simulation training using improved tools and associated factors among healthcare providers in 12 facilities in Tanzania.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare providers working in the labor wards in selected health facilities. The training was conducted in situ using the HBB second edition curriculum with improved simulation tools (Neonatalie Live simulator, NeoBeat heart rate meter, and Upright resuscitator). After training, skills acquisition was evaluated using Objectively Structured Clinical Evaluation. Participants who scored an average of 75% or above were considered passing. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of staff who passed the evaluation by different demographic categories. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores among demographic categories. Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition were analyzed using modified Poisson regression.

Results: A total of 481 participants were enrolled in the study. Among these, 420 (87.3%) passed the skills evaluation on the first attempt. The overall mean skills score was 92.4%. In bivariable analysis, health facility level, region, age, and experience working in the labor ward were associated with passing skills evaluation on the first attempt. However, after controlling other variables in a multivariable model, none of the factors showed a statistically significant association.

Conclusion: In-situ, HBB simulation training using improved training tools effectively imparts neonatal resuscitation skills among healthcare providers. Participants learned skills similarly regardless of their different demographic characteristics, including level of education and working experience. Due to its potential to impart skills, frequent simulation training using improved tools may be considered for scaling up in other health facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信