{"title":"评估用于放射性药物治疗的降低 CT 剂量图像的自动轮廓准确性:对 177Lu DOTATATE 治疗数据集进行去噪和评估。","authors":"Hung-Te Yang, Kuan-Yin Ko, Ching-Ching Yang","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Reducing radiation dose attributed to computed tomography (CT) may compromise the accuracy of organ segmentation, an important step in <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy that affects both activity and mass estimates. This study aimed to facilitate CT dose reduction using deep learning methods for patients undergoing serial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging during <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE patient dataset hosted in Deep Blue Data was used in this study. The noise insertion method incorporating the effect of bowtie filter, automatic exposure control, and electronic noise was applied to simulate images at four reduced dose levels. Organ segmentation was carried out using the TotalSegmentator model, while image denoising was performed with the DenseNet model. The impact of segmentation performance on the dosimetry accuracy of <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy was quantified by calculating the percent difference between a dose rate map segmented with a reference mask and the same dose rate map segmented with a test mask (PD<sub>dose</sub>) for spleen, right kidney, left kidney, and liver.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Before denoising, the mean ± standard deviation of PD<sub>dose</sub> for all critical organs were 2.31 ± 2.94%, 4.86 ± 9.42%, 8.39 ± 14.76%, 12.95 ± 19.99% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively. After denoising, the corresponding results were 1.69 ± 2.25%, 2.84 ± 4.46%, 3.72 ± 4.22%, 7.98 ± 15.05% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>As dose reduction increased, CT image segmentation gradually deteriorated, which in turn deteriorated the dosimetry accuracy of <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy. Improving CT image quality through denoising could enhance <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE dosimetry, making it a valuable tool to support CT dose reduction for patients undergoing serial SPECT/CT imaging during treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating auto-contouring accuracy in reduced CT dose images for radiopharmaceutical therapies: Denoising and evaluation of 177Lu DOTATATE therapy dataset\",\"authors\":\"Hung-Te Yang, Kuan-Yin Ko, Ching-Ching Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Reducing radiation dose attributed to computed tomography (CT) may compromise the accuracy of organ segmentation, an important step in <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy that affects both activity and mass estimates. This study aimed to facilitate CT dose reduction using deep learning methods for patients undergoing serial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging during <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE patient dataset hosted in Deep Blue Data was used in this study. The noise insertion method incorporating the effect of bowtie filter, automatic exposure control, and electronic noise was applied to simulate images at four reduced dose levels. Organ segmentation was carried out using the TotalSegmentator model, while image denoising was performed with the DenseNet model. The impact of segmentation performance on the dosimetry accuracy of <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy was quantified by calculating the percent difference between a dose rate map segmented with a reference mask and the same dose rate map segmented with a test mask (PD<sub>dose</sub>) for spleen, right kidney, left kidney, and liver.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Before denoising, the mean ± standard deviation of PD<sub>dose</sub> for all critical organs were 2.31 ± 2.94%, 4.86 ± 9.42%, 8.39 ± 14.76%, 12.95 ± 19.99% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively. After denoising, the corresponding results were 1.69 ± 2.25%, 2.84 ± 4.46%, 3.72 ± 4.22%, 7.98 ± 15.05% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>As dose reduction increased, CT image segmentation gradually deteriorated, which in turn deteriorated the dosimetry accuracy of <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE therapy. Improving CT image quality through denoising could enhance <sup>177</sup>Lu DOTATATE dosimetry, making it a valuable tool to support CT dose reduction for patients undergoing serial SPECT/CT imaging during treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating auto-contouring accuracy in reduced CT dose images for radiopharmaceutical therapies: Denoising and evaluation of 177Lu DOTATATE therapy dataset
Purpose
Reducing radiation dose attributed to computed tomography (CT) may compromise the accuracy of organ segmentation, an important step in 177Lu DOTATATE therapy that affects both activity and mass estimates. This study aimed to facilitate CT dose reduction using deep learning methods for patients undergoing serial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging during 177Lu DOTATATE therapy.
Methods
The 177Lu DOTATATE patient dataset hosted in Deep Blue Data was used in this study. The noise insertion method incorporating the effect of bowtie filter, automatic exposure control, and electronic noise was applied to simulate images at four reduced dose levels. Organ segmentation was carried out using the TotalSegmentator model, while image denoising was performed with the DenseNet model. The impact of segmentation performance on the dosimetry accuracy of 177Lu DOTATATE therapy was quantified by calculating the percent difference between a dose rate map segmented with a reference mask and the same dose rate map segmented with a test mask (PDdose) for spleen, right kidney, left kidney, and liver.
Results
Before denoising, the mean ± standard deviation of PDdose for all critical organs were 2.31 ± 2.94%, 4.86 ± 9.42%, 8.39 ± 14.76%, 12.95 ± 19.99% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively. After denoising, the corresponding results were 1.69 ± 2.25%, 2.84 ± 4.46%, 3.72 ± 4.22%, 7.98 ± 15.05% in CT images at dose levels down to 20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% of the normal dose, respectively.
Conclusion
As dose reduction increased, CT image segmentation gradually deteriorated, which in turn deteriorated the dosimetry accuracy of 177Lu DOTATATE therapy. Improving CT image quality through denoising could enhance 177Lu DOTATATE dosimetry, making it a valuable tool to support CT dose reduction for patients undergoing serial SPECT/CT imaging during treatment.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic