{"title":"手术控制的后外侧入路机器人辅助模式有助于实现高度中等的颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入,避免椎动脉损伤。","authors":"Yoichi Tani, Nobuhiro Naka, Naoto Ono, Koki Kawashima, Masaaki Paku, Masayuki Ishihara, Takashi Adachi, Shinichirou Taniguchi, Muneharu Ando, Takanori Saito","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08753-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The small pedicle widths, the thin lateral cortical shell next to the vertebral artery (VA), and the strongly tilted pedicle axis anteromedially narrow the safety margin for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement against vertebral artery (VA) injury. We have studied whether the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of a posterolateral approach with a table-mounted, surgeon-controlled mode of robotic assistance (group R) improves the VA safety compared to C-arm fluoroscopy-guided conventional open technique (group F).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group R consisted of 165 screws in 37 patients and group F, 199 screws in 52 patients. The two groups covered a broad range of vertebral levels from C2 to C7 with comparable distribution (p = 0.0512) for treating a similar variety of diseases (p = 0.6958).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group R, compared with group F, showed a greater lateral-to-medial CPS inclination (p ≤ 0.0004) that even exceeded the obliquity of corresponding pedicle axis, leading to a higher rate of acceptable CPS placement (93.4% vs. 85.4%; p = 0.0164) with a lower rate of lateral breach (1.2% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For CPS placement, robot-assisted MIS obviously eliminates morbidity-prone soft-tissue dissection, radiation exposure to the surgical team, and human manual errors. The current study revealed its additional benefit of better safety against VA injury by allowing us to place CPS with a steep lateral-to-medial angulation owing to (1) a lack of counter pressure from the paravertebral muscles and (2) minimizing a navigation pitfall of untracked pressure-induced vertebral rotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A surgeon-controlled mode of robotic assistance with posterolateral approach helps achieve highly medialized cervical pedicle screw placement to avoid vertebral artery injury.\",\"authors\":\"Yoichi Tani, Nobuhiro Naka, Naoto Ono, Koki Kawashima, Masaaki Paku, Masayuki Ishihara, Takashi Adachi, Shinichirou Taniguchi, Muneharu Ando, Takanori Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-08753-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The small pedicle widths, the thin lateral cortical shell next to the vertebral artery (VA), and the strongly tilted pedicle axis anteromedially narrow the safety margin for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement against vertebral artery (VA) injury. We have studied whether the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of a posterolateral approach with a table-mounted, surgeon-controlled mode of robotic assistance (group R) improves the VA safety compared to C-arm fluoroscopy-guided conventional open technique (group F).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group R consisted of 165 screws in 37 patients and group F, 199 screws in 52 patients. The two groups covered a broad range of vertebral levels from C2 to C7 with comparable distribution (p = 0.0512) for treating a similar variety of diseases (p = 0.6958).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group R, compared with group F, showed a greater lateral-to-medial CPS inclination (p ≤ 0.0004) that even exceeded the obliquity of corresponding pedicle axis, leading to a higher rate of acceptable CPS placement (93.4% vs. 85.4%; p = 0.0164) with a lower rate of lateral breach (1.2% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For CPS placement, robot-assisted MIS obviously eliminates morbidity-prone soft-tissue dissection, radiation exposure to the surgical team, and human manual errors. The current study revealed its additional benefit of better safety against VA injury by allowing us to place CPS with a steep lateral-to-medial angulation owing to (1) a lack of counter pressure from the paravertebral muscles and (2) minimizing a navigation pitfall of untracked pressure-induced vertebral rotation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08753-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08753-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:椎弓根宽度小,靠近椎动脉(VA)的外侧皮质壳薄,椎弓根轴前内侧强烈倾斜,缩小了颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)置入椎动脉(VA)损伤的安全范围。我们研究了与c臂透视引导下的传统开放技术(F组)相比,后外侧入路的微创手术(R组)与手术控制模式的机器人辅助(R组)是否提高了VA的安全性。方法:R组包括37例患者165颗螺钉,F组包括52例患者199颗螺钉。两组涵盖了从C2到C7的广泛椎体水平,在治疗类似种类的疾病方面具有相似的分布(p = 0.0512) (p = 0.6958)。结果:与F组相比,R组CPS向外侧内侧倾斜更大(p≤0.0004),甚至超过相应椎弓根轴的倾斜度,可接受的CPS放置率更高(93.4% vs. 85.4%;P = 0.0164),侧裂率较低(1.2% vs. 10.1%;p = 0.0004)。结论:对于CPS放置,机器人辅助MIS明显消除了易发病的软组织剥离、手术团队的辐射暴露和人为错误。目前的研究表明,由于(1)缺乏椎旁肌肉的反压力,(2)最大限度地减少了压力诱导的椎体旋转造成的导航陷阱,因此可以将CPS放置在陡峭的侧-内侧角度,从而提高了对VA损伤的安全性。
A surgeon-controlled mode of robotic assistance with posterolateral approach helps achieve highly medialized cervical pedicle screw placement to avoid vertebral artery injury.
Purpose: The small pedicle widths, the thin lateral cortical shell next to the vertebral artery (VA), and the strongly tilted pedicle axis anteromedially narrow the safety margin for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement against vertebral artery (VA) injury. We have studied whether the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of a posterolateral approach with a table-mounted, surgeon-controlled mode of robotic assistance (group R) improves the VA safety compared to C-arm fluoroscopy-guided conventional open technique (group F).
Methods: Group R consisted of 165 screws in 37 patients and group F, 199 screws in 52 patients. The two groups covered a broad range of vertebral levels from C2 to C7 with comparable distribution (p = 0.0512) for treating a similar variety of diseases (p = 0.6958).
Results: Group R, compared with group F, showed a greater lateral-to-medial CPS inclination (p ≤ 0.0004) that even exceeded the obliquity of corresponding pedicle axis, leading to a higher rate of acceptable CPS placement (93.4% vs. 85.4%; p = 0.0164) with a lower rate of lateral breach (1.2% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.0004).
Conclusion: For CPS placement, robot-assisted MIS obviously eliminates morbidity-prone soft-tissue dissection, radiation exposure to the surgical team, and human manual errors. The current study revealed its additional benefit of better safety against VA injury by allowing us to place CPS with a steep lateral-to-medial angulation owing to (1) a lack of counter pressure from the paravertebral muscles and (2) minimizing a navigation pitfall of untracked pressure-induced vertebral rotation.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe