评估认证医院中自杀风险筛查做法的普遍性。

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Salome O Chitavi, Scott C Williams, Jamie Patrianakos, Stephen P Schmaltz, Edwin D Boudreaux, Brian K Ahmedani, Kimberly Roaten, Katherine Anne Kate Comtois, Farzana Akkas, Gregory K Brown
{"title":"评估认证医院中自杀风险筛查做法的普遍性。","authors":"Salome O Chitavi, Scott C Williams, Jamie Patrianakos, Stephen P Schmaltz, Edwin D Boudreaux, Brian K Ahmedani, Kimberly Roaten, Katherine Anne Kate Comtois, Farzana Akkas, Gregory K Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) on suicide prevention (NPSG.15.01.01) requires accredited hospitals to screen all patients aged 12 years and older who are being evaluated or treated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care for suicidal ideation using a validated screening tool. Some hospitals have expanded screening to include nonbehavioral health care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study explored the prevalence and challenges of suicide risk screening practices among Joint Commission-accredited hospitals. An online questionnaire was sent to 859 general medical/surgical hospitals. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in response rates, and responses were adjusted by hospital characteristics (bed capacity, location, system, and teaching status).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 (33.1%) hospitals responded. The majority (n = 225 [79.2%]) reported screening all patients hospitalwide, and 185 (65.1%) had implemented a suicide prevention framework that includes protocols for positive screens and risk assessment. Challenges for implementing a comprehensive universal suicide risk screening and assessment protocol included insufficient staffing and lack of secure environments for at-risk patients. Of the 59 organizations not conducting hospitalwide screening, 94.9% indicated multiple reasons, including negative impact on workflow (30 [50.8%]), burden on providers (30 [50.8%]), not a requirement (29 [49.2%]), and workflow feasibility (28 [47.5%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest the majority of accredited hospitals have implemented suicide risk screening practices that exceed current Joint Commission requirements. The lack of sufficient resources to adequately address patients who screen positive for suicide risk remains a key challenge to universal screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Prevalence of Suicide Risk Screening Practices in Accredited Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Salome O Chitavi, Scott C Williams, Jamie Patrianakos, Stephen P Schmaltz, Edwin D Boudreaux, Brian K Ahmedani, Kimberly Roaten, Katherine Anne Kate Comtois, Farzana Akkas, Gregory K Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.01.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) on suicide prevention (NPSG.15.01.01) requires accredited hospitals to screen all patients aged 12 years and older who are being evaluated or treated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care for suicidal ideation using a validated screening tool. Some hospitals have expanded screening to include nonbehavioral health care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study explored the prevalence and challenges of suicide risk screening practices among Joint Commission-accredited hospitals. An online questionnaire was sent to 859 general medical/surgical hospitals. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in response rates, and responses were adjusted by hospital characteristics (bed capacity, location, system, and teaching status).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 (33.1%) hospitals responded. The majority (n = 225 [79.2%]) reported screening all patients hospitalwide, and 185 (65.1%) had implemented a suicide prevention framework that includes protocols for positive screens and risk assessment. Challenges for implementing a comprehensive universal suicide risk screening and assessment protocol included insufficient staffing and lack of secure environments for at-risk patients. Of the 59 organizations not conducting hospitalwide screening, 94.9% indicated multiple reasons, including negative impact on workflow (30 [50.8%]), burden on providers (30 [50.8%]), not a requirement (29 [49.2%]), and workflow feasibility (28 [47.5%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest the majority of accredited hospitals have implemented suicide risk screening practices that exceed current Joint Commission requirements. The lack of sufficient resources to adequately address patients who screen positive for suicide risk remains a key challenge to universal screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.01.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.01.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Prevalence of Suicide Risk Screening Practices in Accredited Hospitals.

Background: The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) on suicide prevention (NPSG.15.01.01) requires accredited hospitals to screen all patients aged 12 years and older who are being evaluated or treated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care for suicidal ideation using a validated screening tool. Some hospitals have expanded screening to include nonbehavioral health care patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study explored the prevalence and challenges of suicide risk screening practices among Joint Commission-accredited hospitals. An online questionnaire was sent to 859 general medical/surgical hospitals. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in response rates, and responses were adjusted by hospital characteristics (bed capacity, location, system, and teaching status).

Results: A total of 284 (33.1%) hospitals responded. The majority (n = 225 [79.2%]) reported screening all patients hospitalwide, and 185 (65.1%) had implemented a suicide prevention framework that includes protocols for positive screens and risk assessment. Challenges for implementing a comprehensive universal suicide risk screening and assessment protocol included insufficient staffing and lack of secure environments for at-risk patients. Of the 59 organizations not conducting hospitalwide screening, 94.9% indicated multiple reasons, including negative impact on workflow (30 [50.8%]), burden on providers (30 [50.8%]), not a requirement (29 [49.2%]), and workflow feasibility (28 [47.5%]).

Conclusion: Results suggest the majority of accredited hospitals have implemented suicide risk screening practices that exceed current Joint Commission requirements. The lack of sufficient resources to adequately address patients who screen positive for suicide risk remains a key challenge to universal screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信