P Lehoux, I Ganache, O Demers-Payette, H P Silva, G Plamondon, M de Guise
{"title":"卫生组织应对当今卫生系统面临的挑战:从卫生角度进行负责任的创新。","authors":"P Lehoux, I Ganache, O Demers-Payette, H P Silva, G Plamondon, M de Guise","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Though Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has steadily grown over the past decades, less attention has been paid to the way HTA may prove more responsive to the broader economic, social, and environmental challenges that health systems are facing today. In view of climate change, chronic diseases, an aging population, inequalities, and workforce issues, the HTA community's unique set of skills nonetheless holds great potential to help decision-makers strengthen many publicly funded health systems around the world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article adopts an integrated system-wide perspective guided by the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework to explore how the HTA community may not only adapt to the <i>speed</i> of innovation but also consider its direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because RIH aims to steer innovation toward a more sustainable pathway, it can help HTA agencies anticipate decision-makers' informational needs regarding four systemic challenges: (1) equitable access; (2) workforce issues; (3) accountable policy trade-offs; and (4) environmental sustainability. We clarify how key elements of the RIH framework may be used by HTA agencies to: (1) supplement their evaluation process; (2) align their priority-setting or strategic planning activities with their health system challenges; or (3) inform the production of early HTAs, horizon scans, or reports that are broader in scope than a single technology review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The article concludes with three practical implications that were identified by the <i>Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux</i> (INESSS) (Québec, Canada) and may inspire other HTA agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HTA responsiveness to today's challenges to health systems: a responsible innovation in health perspective.\",\"authors\":\"P Lehoux, I Ganache, O Demers-Payette, H P Silva, G Plamondon, M de Guise\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325000121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Though Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has steadily grown over the past decades, less attention has been paid to the way HTA may prove more responsive to the broader economic, social, and environmental challenges that health systems are facing today. In view of climate change, chronic diseases, an aging population, inequalities, and workforce issues, the HTA community's unique set of skills nonetheless holds great potential to help decision-makers strengthen many publicly funded health systems around the world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article adopts an integrated system-wide perspective guided by the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework to explore how the HTA community may not only adapt to the <i>speed</i> of innovation but also consider its direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because RIH aims to steer innovation toward a more sustainable pathway, it can help HTA agencies anticipate decision-makers' informational needs regarding four systemic challenges: (1) equitable access; (2) workforce issues; (3) accountable policy trade-offs; and (4) environmental sustainability. We clarify how key elements of the RIH framework may be used by HTA agencies to: (1) supplement their evaluation process; (2) align their priority-setting or strategic planning activities with their health system challenges; or (3) inform the production of early HTAs, horizon scans, or reports that are broader in scope than a single technology review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The article concludes with three practical implications that were identified by the <i>Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux</i> (INESSS) (Québec, Canada) and may inspire other HTA agencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导论:尽管卫生技术评估(HTA)在过去几十年中稳步发展,但人们对HTA如何更好地应对当今卫生系统所面临的更广泛的经济、社会和环境挑战的关注较少。尽管如此,鉴于气候变化、慢性病、人口老龄化、不平等和劳动力问题,HTA社区的一套独特技能仍具有巨大潜力,可以帮助决策者加强世界各地许多公共资助的卫生系统。方法:本文以负责任的卫生创新(Responsible Innovation in Health, RIH)框架为指导,采用综合的全系统视角,探讨卫生技术社区如何在适应创新速度的同时考虑创新的方向。结果:由于RIH旨在引导创新走向更可持续的路径,它可以帮助HTA机构预测决策者在四个系统性挑战方面的信息需求:(1)公平获取;(2)劳动力问题;(3)负责任的政策权衡;(4)环境可持续性。我们阐明了HTA机构如何使用RIH框架的关键要素:(1)补充其评估过程;(2)使其重点确定或战略规划活动与卫生系统面临的挑战保持一致;或(3)告知早期hta的制作,水平扫描,或范围比单一技术审查更广泛的报告。结论:这篇文章总结了三个实际意义,这些意义是由加拿大quacimubec国家卫生服务协会(INESSS)确定的,并可能启发其他卫生服务协会机构。
HTA responsiveness to today's challenges to health systems: a responsible innovation in health perspective.
Introduction: Though Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has steadily grown over the past decades, less attention has been paid to the way HTA may prove more responsive to the broader economic, social, and environmental challenges that health systems are facing today. In view of climate change, chronic diseases, an aging population, inequalities, and workforce issues, the HTA community's unique set of skills nonetheless holds great potential to help decision-makers strengthen many publicly funded health systems around the world.
Methods: This article adopts an integrated system-wide perspective guided by the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework to explore how the HTA community may not only adapt to the speed of innovation but also consider its direction.
Results: Because RIH aims to steer innovation toward a more sustainable pathway, it can help HTA agencies anticipate decision-makers' informational needs regarding four systemic challenges: (1) equitable access; (2) workforce issues; (3) accountable policy trade-offs; and (4) environmental sustainability. We clarify how key elements of the RIH framework may be used by HTA agencies to: (1) supplement their evaluation process; (2) align their priority-setting or strategic planning activities with their health system challenges; or (3) inform the production of early HTAs, horizon scans, or reports that are broader in scope than a single technology review.
Conclusions: The article concludes with three practical implications that were identified by the Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux (INESSS) (Québec, Canada) and may inspire other HTA agencies.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.