IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Qiang Zhang, Shiyang Dong, Chonglong Shi, Wenjie Jin
{"title":"Effect of the new non-inflatable laryngeal mask GMA-Tulip on airway management for lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Qiang Zhang, Shiyang Dong, Chonglong Shi, Wenjie Jin","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02985-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is nowadays widely used as a ventilation device. The GMA-Tulip is a new non-inflatable SAD used to establish short-term artificial airway for general anesthesia or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In the present study, we compare the clinical performance of the GMA-Tulip and the LMA Supreme for lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 70 anesthetized and paralyzed adult patients, the GMA-Tulip (n = 35) or the LMA Supreme (n = 35) was inserted. The primary outcome was oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). The secondary outcomes included the peak airway pressure (PAP), insertion time, insert resistance, number of insertion attempt and manipulations, glottic exposure grading, and incidence of perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GMA group had a significantly higher OLP and lower PAP at the 4 measurement points than did the Supreme group (P < 0.05). Compared with that in the supine position, the OLP of the two groups was significantly lower in the lateral position (P < 0.05). The LMA Supreme had a longer insert time (36(32,39) vs. 18(15,22) sec; P < 0.001) and was inserted more difficultly (P < 0.05). The sore throat scores one hour after surgery at the LMA Supreme was higher than that at the GMA-Tulip (P < 0.05), but the incidence of blood staining was not different between the two groups (P = 0.106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GMA-Tulip and LMA Supreme both provided considerable ventilation efficiency during lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients. Our data showed that new non-inflatable laryngeal mask GMA-Tulip has a higher OLP and demonstrated a shorter time to successful placement and a lower sore throat score one hour after surgery compared with the LMA Supreme.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was retrospectively registered on August 30, 2024 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2400088996 (30/08/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02985-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:声门上气道装置(SAD)如今已被广泛用作通气设备。GMA-Tulip 是一种新型非充气式 SAD,用于为全身麻醉或心肺复苏建立短期人工气道。在本研究中,我们比较了 GMA-Tulip 和 LMA Supreme 在老年患者侧全髋关节置换术中的临床表现:方法:在 70 名麻醉和瘫痪的成年患者中插入 GMA-Tulip(35 人)或 LMA Supreme(35 人)。主要结果是口咽漏压(OLP)。次要结果包括气道峰压 (PAP)、插入时间、插入阻力、插入尝试和操作次数、声门暴露分级以及围手术期并发症的发生率:GMA 组在 4 个测量点的 OLP 和 PAP 均明显高于 Supreme 组(P 结论:GMA-Tulip 和 LMA 组在 4 个测量点的 OLP 和 PAP 均明显低于 Supreme 组:GMA-Tulip 和 LMA Supreme 都能在老年患者侧位全髋关节置换术中提供相当高的通气效率。我们的数据显示,与 LMA Supreme 相比,新型非充气喉罩 GMA-Tulip 的 OLP 更高,成功置入时间更短,术后一小时的咽喉痛评分更低:该试验于2024年8月30日在中国临床试验注册中心进行了回顾性注册,注册号为ChiCTR2400088996(30/08/2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the new non-inflatable laryngeal mask GMA-Tulip on airway management for lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is nowadays widely used as a ventilation device. The GMA-Tulip is a new non-inflatable SAD used to establish short-term artificial airway for general anesthesia or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In the present study, we compare the clinical performance of the GMA-Tulip and the LMA Supreme for lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients.

Methods: In 70 anesthetized and paralyzed adult patients, the GMA-Tulip (n = 35) or the LMA Supreme (n = 35) was inserted. The primary outcome was oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). The secondary outcomes included the peak airway pressure (PAP), insertion time, insert resistance, number of insertion attempt and manipulations, glottic exposure grading, and incidence of perioperative complications.

Results: The GMA group had a significantly higher OLP and lower PAP at the 4 measurement points than did the Supreme group (P < 0.05). Compared with that in the supine position, the OLP of the two groups was significantly lower in the lateral position (P < 0.05). The LMA Supreme had a longer insert time (36(32,39) vs. 18(15,22) sec; P < 0.001) and was inserted more difficultly (P < 0.05). The sore throat scores one hour after surgery at the LMA Supreme was higher than that at the GMA-Tulip (P < 0.05), but the incidence of blood staining was not different between the two groups (P = 0.106).

Conclusions: The GMA-Tulip and LMA Supreme both provided considerable ventilation efficiency during lateral total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients. Our data showed that new non-inflatable laryngeal mask GMA-Tulip has a higher OLP and demonstrated a shorter time to successful placement and a lower sore throat score one hour after surgery compared with the LMA Supreme.

Trial registration: The trial was retrospectively registered on August 30, 2024 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number ChiCTR2400088996 (30/08/2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信