秋水仙碱对生育、妊娠和哺乳的安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析,为EULAR/PReS对家族性地中海热的建议提供信息。

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.005
Teresa Otón, Erdal Sağ, Loreto Carmona, Seza Ozen
{"title":"秋水仙碱对生育、妊娠和哺乳的安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析,为EULAR/PReS对家族性地中海热的建议提供信息。","authors":"Teresa Otón, Erdal Sağ, Loreto Carmona, Seza Ozen","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarise the evidence of colchicine's effects on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation in the treatment of patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers and a methodologist conducted the systematic review. Together with an expert in FMF, they established the protocol and the PICOt questions. Medline via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until August 23, 2023. All clinical trials, cohort studies, or case series focused on the safety of colchicine in FMF, concerning reproductive issues or breastfeeding, and involving at least 5 patients were eligible. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was planned for at least 2 homogeneous studies with fixed-effect models using the Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included overall of moderate to low quality. The RR of miscarriage or foetal loss with colchicine in FMF was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.67-1.12), showing a heterogeneity of 31%. The percentage of birth defects in the exposed group ranged from 0.6% to 4.0%, not very different, comparable to the rates of women with FMF without exposure to colchicine. Regarding fertility, there were no apparent differences between colchicine-exposed and nonexposed groups, neither among women nor men (sperm assessment). Only 1 study reported breastfeeding data, showing no growth differences among exposed and nonexposed babies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colchicine appears to have a good risk-benefit profile regarding reproductive safety. Ideally, higher-quality studies should be performed, especially regarding male fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1045-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of colchicine on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation: a systematic review and meta-analysis informing the EULAR/PReS recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Otón, Erdal Sağ, Loreto Carmona, Seza Ozen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarise the evidence of colchicine's effects on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation in the treatment of patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers and a methodologist conducted the systematic review. Together with an expert in FMF, they established the protocol and the PICOt questions. Medline via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until August 23, 2023. All clinical trials, cohort studies, or case series focused on the safety of colchicine in FMF, concerning reproductive issues or breastfeeding, and involving at least 5 patients were eligible. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was planned for at least 2 homogeneous studies with fixed-effect models using the Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included overall of moderate to low quality. The RR of miscarriage or foetal loss with colchicine in FMF was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.67-1.12), showing a heterogeneity of 31%. The percentage of birth defects in the exposed group ranged from 0.6% to 4.0%, not very different, comparable to the rates of women with FMF without exposure to colchicine. Regarding fertility, there were no apparent differences between colchicine-exposed and nonexposed groups, neither among women nor men (sperm assessment). Only 1 study reported breastfeeding data, showing no growth differences among exposed and nonexposed babies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colchicine appears to have a good risk-benefit profile regarding reproductive safety. Ideally, higher-quality studies should be performed, especially regarding male fertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1045-1051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:总结秋水仙碱对家族性地中海热(FMF)患者生育、妊娠和哺乳影响的证据。方法:2名审稿人和1名方法学家进行系统评价。他们与FMF专家一起制定了协议和PICOt问题。Medline通过PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行检索,从成立到2023年8月23日。所有关注秋水仙碱在FMF中的安全性的临床试验、队列研究或病例系列,涉及生殖问题或母乳喂养,且涉及至少5名患者均符合条件。研究中的偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。使用Mantel-Haenszel方法计划对至少2项具有固定效应模型的同质研究进行meta分析,以获得合并风险比(RR)和95% CI。结果:共纳入25项中低质量研究。秋水仙碱在FMF中流产或胎儿丢失的RR为0.87 (95% CI, 0.67-1.12),异质性为31%。暴露组的出生缺陷百分比从0.6%到4.0%不等,与未暴露于秋水仙碱的FMF妇女的比率相差不大。关于生育能力,秋水仙碱暴露组和未暴露组之间没有明显差异,女性和男性之间都没有(精子评估)。只有一项研究报告了母乳喂养数据,显示暴露和未暴露的婴儿之间没有生长差异。结论:秋水仙碱在生殖安全方面具有良好的风险-收益特征。理想情况下,应该进行高质量的研究,特别是关于男性生育能力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of colchicine on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation: a systematic review and meta-analysis informing the EULAR/PReS recommendations for familial Mediterranean fever.

Objectives: To summarise the evidence of colchicine's effects on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation in the treatment of patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF).

Methods: Two reviewers and a methodologist conducted the systematic review. Together with an expert in FMF, they established the protocol and the PICOt questions. Medline via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until August 23, 2023. All clinical trials, cohort studies, or case series focused on the safety of colchicine in FMF, concerning reproductive issues or breastfeeding, and involving at least 5 patients were eligible. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was planned for at least 2 homogeneous studies with fixed-effect models using the Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI.

Results: Twenty-five studies were included overall of moderate to low quality. The RR of miscarriage or foetal loss with colchicine in FMF was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.67-1.12), showing a heterogeneity of 31%. The percentage of birth defects in the exposed group ranged from 0.6% to 4.0%, not very different, comparable to the rates of women with FMF without exposure to colchicine. Regarding fertility, there were no apparent differences between colchicine-exposed and nonexposed groups, neither among women nor men (sperm assessment). Only 1 study reported breastfeeding data, showing no growth differences among exposed and nonexposed babies.

Conclusions: Colchicine appears to have a good risk-benefit profile regarding reproductive safety. Ideally, higher-quality studies should be performed, especially regarding male fertility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信