加强小儿腹部钝挫伤的临床风险评估:使用超声波和实验室数据的新型评分系统。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Elahe Nasri Nasrabadi, Zahra Rabiei, Neda Al-Sadat Fatemi, Farhad Heydari
{"title":"加强小儿腹部钝挫伤的临床风险评估:使用超声波和实验室数据的新型评分系统。","authors":"Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Elahe Nasri Nasrabadi, Zahra Rabiei, Neda Al-Sadat Fatemi, Farhad Heydari","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01196-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the importance of diagnosing intra-abdominal injury (IAI) in children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and preventing radiation exposure to children by avoiding CT scans, this study aimed to evaluate a scoring criterion based on ultrasound (US) findings and laboratory data in assessing the clinical risk of IAI in children with BAT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, baseline and clinical information of 180 children (under 18 years of age) with BAT including physical examination, hemodynamic parameters, and laboratory data, were extracted from medical records. US findings were considered abnormal if any report of mild free fluid or solid organ injury was noted. The presence or absence of IAI was assessed through medical records or telephone interviews to inquire about the patients' outcome within the two-week period post-discharge. The primary outcome was the identification of IAI, assessed through a combination of US findings, physical examination (abdominal tenderness), and laboratory parameters (WBC count and hematuria). The measurement methods included Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test, logistic regression, and ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current study showed that 153 (85%) and 27 (15%) patients were without and with IAI, respectively. The positive US finding with sensitivity and specificity of 92.59% and 44.44%, respectively, abdominal tenderness with sensitivity and specificity of 81.48% and 87.58%, respectively, hematuria with sensitivity and specificity of 62.96% and 50.33%, respectively, and high WBC level with sensitivity and specificity of 85.19% and 76.47%, had a significant diagnostic value in detecting the presence of IAI (P value < 0.001). A cutoff point ≥ 2 from the sum of the scores of these four criteria can predict the presence of IAI with a sensitivity of 81.48% and a specificity of 94.12% (AUC = 0.94; P value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that a scoring system based on positive US findings, abdominal tenderness, hematuria, and high WBC levels effectively diagnoses IAI in BAT children. A score of 2 or more strongly indicates the presence of IAI, improving decision-making for further imaging and treatment. Implementing this system can reduce unnecessary CT scans and radiation exposure, enhancing pediatric trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing clinical risk assessment in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: A novel scoring system using ultrasound and laboratory data.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Elahe Nasri Nasrabadi, Zahra Rabiei, Neda Al-Sadat Fatemi, Farhad Heydari\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01196-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the importance of diagnosing intra-abdominal injury (IAI) in children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and preventing radiation exposure to children by avoiding CT scans, this study aimed to evaluate a scoring criterion based on ultrasound (US) findings and laboratory data in assessing the clinical risk of IAI in children with BAT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, baseline and clinical information of 180 children (under 18 years of age) with BAT including physical examination, hemodynamic parameters, and laboratory data, were extracted from medical records. US findings were considered abnormal if any report of mild free fluid or solid organ injury was noted. The presence or absence of IAI was assessed through medical records or telephone interviews to inquire about the patients' outcome within the two-week period post-discharge. The primary outcome was the identification of IAI, assessed through a combination of US findings, physical examination (abdominal tenderness), and laboratory parameters (WBC count and hematuria). The measurement methods included Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test, logistic regression, and ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current study showed that 153 (85%) and 27 (15%) patients were without and with IAI, respectively. The positive US finding with sensitivity and specificity of 92.59% and 44.44%, respectively, abdominal tenderness with sensitivity and specificity of 81.48% and 87.58%, respectively, hematuria with sensitivity and specificity of 62.96% and 50.33%, respectively, and high WBC level with sensitivity and specificity of 85.19% and 76.47%, had a significant diagnostic value in detecting the presence of IAI (P value < 0.001). A cutoff point ≥ 2 from the sum of the scores of these four criteria can predict the presence of IAI with a sensitivity of 81.48% and a specificity of 94.12% (AUC = 0.94; P value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that a scoring system based on positive US findings, abdominal tenderness, hematuria, and high WBC levels effectively diagnoses IAI in BAT children. A score of 2 or more strongly indicates the presence of IAI, improving decision-making for further imaging and treatment. Implementing this system can reduce unnecessary CT scans and radiation exposure, enhancing pediatric trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01196-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01196-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到诊断钝性腹部创伤(BAT)儿童腹内损伤(IAI)和避免CT扫描预防儿童辐射暴露的重要性,本研究旨在评估基于超声(US)结果和实验室数据的评分标准,以评估BAT儿童腹内损伤的临床风险。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析180例18岁以下BAT患儿的基线和临床资料,包括体格检查、血流动力学参数和实验室数据。如果注意到任何轻度游离液体或固体器官损伤的报告,则认为美国的发现是异常的。通过医疗记录或电话访谈来评估是否存在IAI,以询问患者出院后两周内的结果。主要结局是IAI的确定,通过美国检查结果、体格检查(腹部压痛)和实验室参数(白细胞计数和血尿)进行评估。计量方法包括卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、独立样本t检验、logistic回归和ROC分析。结果:目前的研究显示,153例(85%)患者无IAI, 27例(15%)患者有IAI。US阳性发现的敏感性和特异性分别为92.59%和44.44%,腹部压痛的敏感性和特异性分别为81.48%和87.58%,血尿的敏感性和特异性分别为62.96%和50.33%,高白细胞水平的敏感性和特异性分别为85.19%和76.47%,对检测IAI的存在具有显著的诊断价值(P值)。本研究表明,基于US阳性结果、腹部压痛、血尿和高白细胞水平的评分系统可有效诊断BAT儿童的IAI。2分或以上强烈提示存在IAI,可改善进一步成像和治疗的决策。实施该系统可以减少不必要的CT扫描和辐射暴露,加强儿科创伤护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing clinical risk assessment in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: A novel scoring system using ultrasound and laboratory data.

Background: Given the importance of diagnosing intra-abdominal injury (IAI) in children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and preventing radiation exposure to children by avoiding CT scans, this study aimed to evaluate a scoring criterion based on ultrasound (US) findings and laboratory data in assessing the clinical risk of IAI in children with BAT.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, baseline and clinical information of 180 children (under 18 years of age) with BAT including physical examination, hemodynamic parameters, and laboratory data, were extracted from medical records. US findings were considered abnormal if any report of mild free fluid or solid organ injury was noted. The presence or absence of IAI was assessed through medical records or telephone interviews to inquire about the patients' outcome within the two-week period post-discharge. The primary outcome was the identification of IAI, assessed through a combination of US findings, physical examination (abdominal tenderness), and laboratory parameters (WBC count and hematuria). The measurement methods included Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test, logistic regression, and ROC analysis.

Results: The current study showed that 153 (85%) and 27 (15%) patients were without and with IAI, respectively. The positive US finding with sensitivity and specificity of 92.59% and 44.44%, respectively, abdominal tenderness with sensitivity and specificity of 81.48% and 87.58%, respectively, hematuria with sensitivity and specificity of 62.96% and 50.33%, respectively, and high WBC level with sensitivity and specificity of 85.19% and 76.47%, had a significant diagnostic value in detecting the presence of IAI (P value < 0.001). A cutoff point ≥ 2 from the sum of the scores of these four criteria can predict the presence of IAI with a sensitivity of 81.48% and a specificity of 94.12% (AUC = 0.94; P value < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study shows that a scoring system based on positive US findings, abdominal tenderness, hematuria, and high WBC levels effectively diagnoses IAI in BAT children. A score of 2 or more strongly indicates the presence of IAI, improving decision-making for further imaging and treatment. Implementing this system can reduce unnecessary CT scans and radiation exposure, enhancing pediatric trauma care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信