复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的进一步策略:挽救治疗和移植巩固治疗,日常临床实践经验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Cinzia Pellegrini, Beatrice Casadei, Alessandro Broccoli, Martina Cantelli, Gabriele Gugliotta, Marianna Gentilini, Matteo Carella, Vittorio Stefoni, Nicole Fabbri, Giulia Gabrielli, Lisa Argnani, Camilla Mazzoni, Pierluca Maglio, Gianmarco Bagnato, Pier Luigi Zinzani
{"title":"复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的进一步策略:挽救治疗和移植巩固治疗,日常临床实践经验。","authors":"Cinzia Pellegrini,&nbsp;Beatrice Casadei,&nbsp;Alessandro Broccoli,&nbsp;Martina Cantelli,&nbsp;Gabriele Gugliotta,&nbsp;Marianna Gentilini,&nbsp;Matteo Carella,&nbsp;Vittorio Stefoni,&nbsp;Nicole Fabbri,&nbsp;Giulia Gabrielli,&nbsp;Lisa Argnani,&nbsp;Camilla Mazzoni,&nbsp;Pierluca Maglio,&nbsp;Gianmarco Bagnato,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Zinzani","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) emerged as an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, many patients lose their response to CPIs. To improve outcomes in this setting, two strategies can be considered: salvage chemotherapy (CHT) for those with an unsatisfactory response, and autologous stem-cell transplantation (auto-SCT) as a consolidation for patients with at least partial response (PR).</p><p>We analyzed retrospectively the effectiveness in terms of rate of response and survivals of these two approaches in cohort 1 (salvage CHT) and in cohort 2 (auto-SCT consolidation). Adverse events were also assessed.</p><p>A total of 45 heavily pre-treated patients were analyzed (median of 4 prior therapies; 93.3% refractory to the last therapy). Thirty patients received further CHT at a median of 32 days (range 1-1213) after CPI Fifteen patients in cohort 2 underwent auto-SCT, with 8 in complete response (CR) and 7 in PR. In cohort 1 a final overall response rate (ORR) of 50.0% with a median progression-free survival of 24.6 months. In cohort 2, the ORR was 93.3% (all CR) with median survivals not reached. No unexpected or cumulative toxicities were observed.</p><p>Our findings suggest that auto-SCT is an effective consolidation strategy for cHL patients who achieve at least a PR after CPI therapy, despite multiple prior lines of treatment. Additionally, CPIs treatment appears to sensitize heavily pre-treated and chemorefractory patients to subsequent chemotherapy, potentially facilitating successful transplant consolidation and improving the chances of cure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":"104 3","pages":"1757 - 1764"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further strategies after immune checkpoint inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: salvage treatments and consolidation with transplantation, experience in daily clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Cinzia Pellegrini,&nbsp;Beatrice Casadei,&nbsp;Alessandro Broccoli,&nbsp;Martina Cantelli,&nbsp;Gabriele Gugliotta,&nbsp;Marianna Gentilini,&nbsp;Matteo Carella,&nbsp;Vittorio Stefoni,&nbsp;Nicole Fabbri,&nbsp;Giulia Gabrielli,&nbsp;Lisa Argnani,&nbsp;Camilla Mazzoni,&nbsp;Pierluca Maglio,&nbsp;Gianmarco Bagnato,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Zinzani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) emerged as an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, many patients lose their response to CPIs. To improve outcomes in this setting, two strategies can be considered: salvage chemotherapy (CHT) for those with an unsatisfactory response, and autologous stem-cell transplantation (auto-SCT) as a consolidation for patients with at least partial response (PR).</p><p>We analyzed retrospectively the effectiveness in terms of rate of response and survivals of these two approaches in cohort 1 (salvage CHT) and in cohort 2 (auto-SCT consolidation). Adverse events were also assessed.</p><p>A total of 45 heavily pre-treated patients were analyzed (median of 4 prior therapies; 93.3% refractory to the last therapy). Thirty patients received further CHT at a median of 32 days (range 1-1213) after CPI Fifteen patients in cohort 2 underwent auto-SCT, with 8 in complete response (CR) and 7 in PR. In cohort 1 a final overall response rate (ORR) of 50.0% with a median progression-free survival of 24.6 months. In cohort 2, the ORR was 93.3% (all CR) with median survivals not reached. No unexpected or cumulative toxicities were observed.</p><p>Our findings suggest that auto-SCT is an effective consolidation strategy for cHL patients who achieve at least a PR after CPI therapy, despite multiple prior lines of treatment. Additionally, CPIs treatment appears to sensitize heavily pre-treated and chemorefractory patients to subsequent chemotherapy, potentially facilitating successful transplant consolidation and improving the chances of cure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\"104 3\",\"pages\":\"1757 - 1764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-025-06255-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(CPIs)成为复发/难治性(R/R)经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)患者有效且安全的治疗选择。然而,许多患者对cpi失去了反应。为了改善这种情况下的预后,可以考虑两种策略:对反应不满意的患者进行补救性化疗(CHT),对至少部分反应(PR)的患者进行自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)作为巩固治疗。我们回顾性地分析了这两种方法在队列1(补救性CHT)和队列2(自动sct巩固)中有效率和存活率的有效性。对不良事件也进行了评估。共分析了45例重度预先治疗的患者(既往4次治疗的中位数;93.3%对末次治疗难治性)。30例患者在CPI后中位32天(范围1-1213)接受了进一步的CHT治疗,队列2中有15例患者接受了auto-SCT,其中8例完全缓解(CR), 7例PR。在队列1中,最终总缓解率(ORR)为50.0%,中位无进展生存期为24.6个月。在队列2中,ORR为93.3%(全部CR),中位生存期未达到。未观察到意外或累积毒性。我们的研究结果表明,对于在CPI治疗后至少达到PR的cHL患者,尽管先前有多条治疗线,但auto-SCT是一种有效的巩固策略。此外,CPIs治疗似乎使预先治疗和化疗难治的患者对后续化疗敏感,潜在地促进移植成功巩固并提高治愈的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Further strategies after immune checkpoint inhibitors in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: salvage treatments and consolidation with transplantation, experience in daily clinical practice

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) emerged as an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, many patients lose their response to CPIs. To improve outcomes in this setting, two strategies can be considered: salvage chemotherapy (CHT) for those with an unsatisfactory response, and autologous stem-cell transplantation (auto-SCT) as a consolidation for patients with at least partial response (PR).

We analyzed retrospectively the effectiveness in terms of rate of response and survivals of these two approaches in cohort 1 (salvage CHT) and in cohort 2 (auto-SCT consolidation). Adverse events were also assessed.

A total of 45 heavily pre-treated patients were analyzed (median of 4 prior therapies; 93.3% refractory to the last therapy). Thirty patients received further CHT at a median of 32 days (range 1-1213) after CPI Fifteen patients in cohort 2 underwent auto-SCT, with 8 in complete response (CR) and 7 in PR. In cohort 1 a final overall response rate (ORR) of 50.0% with a median progression-free survival of 24.6 months. In cohort 2, the ORR was 93.3% (all CR) with median survivals not reached. No unexpected or cumulative toxicities were observed.

Our findings suggest that auto-SCT is an effective consolidation strategy for cHL patients who achieve at least a PR after CPI therapy, despite multiple prior lines of treatment. Additionally, CPIs treatment appears to sensitize heavily pre-treated and chemorefractory patients to subsequent chemotherapy, potentially facilitating successful transplant consolidation and improving the chances of cure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信