使用以人为本的设计解决指南开发和实施中的痛点

Maria Michaels, Chirine Chehab, Mindy Hangsleben
{"title":"使用以人为本的设计解决指南开发和实施中的痛点","authors":"Maria Michaels,&nbsp;Chirine Chehab,&nbsp;Mindy Hangsleben","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Guidelines International Network North America expanded on ‘Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age’, an initiative to innovate guideline development and implementation leveraging technology. The objective: solve pain points ̶ problems occurring at different levels of the customer experience ̶ in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design (HCD). In HCD, customers are people who would use the product or system being designed and are at the center of the design process. HCD builds empathy to understand challenges facing different customers. HCD has three phases: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. <i>Inspiration phase</i>: Semi-structured interviews collected multiple perspectives within guideline development and implementation and determined key pain points (38 participants). <i>Ideation phase</i>: HCD workshop ‘Bringing Guidelines to the Digital Age’ defined design goals, determined design criteria, and developed ‘prototype’ solutions for each pain point with feasibility testing during the workshop (35 participants). <i>Implementation phase</i>: Postworkshop participants continued developing and testing solution designs, tracked progress, and created products to be further tested, iterated, or published (44 participants). Interviews revealed five pain points in implementation stemming from issues in guideline development: (1) lack of clarity of ‘how’ to apply recommendations; (2) inadequate or nonexistent feedback and testing; (3) unclear language; (4) incomplete information; and (5) lack of informatics expertise. Each workshop group produced prototypes – early models of products built to test a concept or process – that were consolidated into five solution categories and refined through post-workshop teams focusing on: (1) patient preferences in recommendations (2) real-world testing and feedback, (3) standard operating procedures for computability and better implementability, (4) artificial intelligence approaches, and (5) connecting informatics with guideline development. HCD provided a user-centered, iterative approach to design solutions leveraging technology to solve paint points and improve implementation of guidelines into patient care. This is a blueprint for using HCD in guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design\",\"authors\":\"Maria Michaels,&nbsp;Chirine Chehab,&nbsp;Mindy Hangsleben\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gin2.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Guidelines International Network North America expanded on ‘Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age’, an initiative to innovate guideline development and implementation leveraging technology. The objective: solve pain points ̶ problems occurring at different levels of the customer experience ̶ in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design (HCD). In HCD, customers are people who would use the product or system being designed and are at the center of the design process. HCD builds empathy to understand challenges facing different customers. HCD has three phases: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. <i>Inspiration phase</i>: Semi-structured interviews collected multiple perspectives within guideline development and implementation and determined key pain points (38 participants). <i>Ideation phase</i>: HCD workshop ‘Bringing Guidelines to the Digital Age’ defined design goals, determined design criteria, and developed ‘prototype’ solutions for each pain point with feasibility testing during the workshop (35 participants). <i>Implementation phase</i>: Postworkshop participants continued developing and testing solution designs, tracked progress, and created products to be further tested, iterated, or published (44 participants). Interviews revealed five pain points in implementation stemming from issues in guideline development: (1) lack of clarity of ‘how’ to apply recommendations; (2) inadequate or nonexistent feedback and testing; (3) unclear language; (4) incomplete information; and (5) lack of informatics expertise. Each workshop group produced prototypes – early models of products built to test a concept or process – that were consolidated into five solution categories and refined through post-workshop teams focusing on: (1) patient preferences in recommendations (2) real-world testing and feedback, (3) standard operating procedures for computability and better implementability, (4) artificial intelligence approaches, and (5) connecting informatics with guideline development. HCD provided a user-centered, iterative approach to design solutions leveraging technology to solve paint points and improve implementation of guidelines into patient care. This is a blueprint for using HCD in guideline development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北美指南国际网络扩展了“适应数字时代的临床指南”,这是一项利用技术创新指南制定和实施的倡议。目标:使用以人为中心的设计(HCD)解决指南开发和实施中的痛点-客户体验不同层次上出现的问题。在HCD中,客户是将要使用正在设计的产品或系统的人,并且是设计过程的中心。HCD建立同理心,以理解不同客户面临的挑战。HCD有三个阶段:灵感、构思和实施。启发阶段:半结构化访谈收集了指南制定和实施中的多个观点,并确定了关键痛点(38名参与者)。构思阶段:HCD研讨会“将指导方针带入数字时代”,定义设计目标,确定设计标准,为每个痛点开发“原型”解决方案,并在研讨会期间进行可行性测试(35名参与者)。实现阶段:研讨会后参与者继续开发和测试解决方案设计,跟踪进度,并创建要进一步测试、迭代或发布的产品(44名参与者)。访谈揭示了指南制定过程中产生的五个实施难点:(1)缺乏“如何”应用建议的明确性;(2)反馈和测试不充分或不存在;(3)语言不清;(4)信息不完整;(5)缺乏信息学专业知识。每个研讨会小组都制作了原型——用于测试概念或流程的产品的早期模型——这些原型被整合为五个解决方案类别,并通过研讨会后团队重点关注:(1)患者对建议的偏好;(2)现实世界的测试和反馈;(3)可计算性和更好的可实施性的标准操作程序;(4)人工智能方法;(5)将信息学与指南开发联系起来。HCD提供了一种以用户为中心的迭代方法来设计解决方案,利用技术来解决绘制点并改进患者护理指南的实施。这是在指南制定中使用HCD的蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design

Solving pain points in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design

Guidelines International Network North America expanded on ‘Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age’, an initiative to innovate guideline development and implementation leveraging technology. The objective: solve pain points ̶ problems occurring at different levels of the customer experience ̶ in guideline development and implementation using human-centered design (HCD). In HCD, customers are people who would use the product or system being designed and are at the center of the design process. HCD builds empathy to understand challenges facing different customers. HCD has three phases: inspiration, ideation, and implementation. Inspiration phase: Semi-structured interviews collected multiple perspectives within guideline development and implementation and determined key pain points (38 participants). Ideation phase: HCD workshop ‘Bringing Guidelines to the Digital Age’ defined design goals, determined design criteria, and developed ‘prototype’ solutions for each pain point with feasibility testing during the workshop (35 participants). Implementation phase: Postworkshop participants continued developing and testing solution designs, tracked progress, and created products to be further tested, iterated, or published (44 participants). Interviews revealed five pain points in implementation stemming from issues in guideline development: (1) lack of clarity of ‘how’ to apply recommendations; (2) inadequate or nonexistent feedback and testing; (3) unclear language; (4) incomplete information; and (5) lack of informatics expertise. Each workshop group produced prototypes – early models of products built to test a concept or process – that were consolidated into five solution categories and refined through post-workshop teams focusing on: (1) patient preferences in recommendations (2) real-world testing and feedback, (3) standard operating procedures for computability and better implementability, (4) artificial intelligence approaches, and (5) connecting informatics with guideline development. HCD provided a user-centered, iterative approach to design solutions leveraging technology to solve paint points and improve implementation of guidelines into patient care. This is a blueprint for using HCD in guideline development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信