比较两种自体植骨治疗锁骨中轴萎缩性骨不连的回顾性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Teng Ma, Qiang Huang, Chaofeng Wang, Cheng Ren, Yibo Xu, Hua Lin, Kun Zhang, Congming Zhang, Zhao Li
{"title":"比较两种自体植骨治疗锁骨中轴萎缩性骨不连的回顾性研究。","authors":"Teng Ma, Qiang Huang, Chaofeng Wang, Cheng Ren, Yibo Xu, Hua Lin, Kun Zhang, Congming Zhang, Zhao Li","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00828-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open reduction, superior plate (SP) fixation, and autologous cancellous granular bone grafting (ACGBG) are common strategies for treating clavicular midshaft atrophic nonunion (CMAN). We aimed to compare the radiological findings and clinical effects of two autologous cancellous bone grafts (ACBGs) and those of single SP fixation, to treat CMAN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study comprised 62 patients admitted to our hospital with CMAN (ACGBG with single SP fixation between March 2012 and October 2017, 32 patients; autologous cancellous structured bone grafting [ACSBG] with single SP fixation between November 2017 and May 2021, 30 patients). Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores, obtained preoperatively and at final follow-up, were recorded and analyzed. Statistical differences between the ACGBG and ACSBG groups were assessed using Fisher's exact and two-sample independent t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient demographics or the incidence of complications. VAS and DASH scores decreased significantly from the preoperative day to 9 months postoperatively in both groups, but this difference was not statistically significant at final follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, compared with mean VAS and DASH scores in the ACGBG group, the ACSBG group showed lower pain and dysfunction scores (p < 0.05). The mean fracture healing times were 15.2 (range, 12-20) and 18.6 (range, 12-32) weeks in the ACSBG and ACGBG groups, respectively (p = 0.01). One case of plate breakage occurred in the ACGBG group at 5 months postoperatively, with recovery following ACSBG revision with single SP fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACSBG combined with single SP fixation is a promising and effective alternative technique for promoting bone union and postoperative early functional rehabilitation in treating CMAN.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing two autologous bone grafting techniques to treat clavicular midshaft atrophic nonunion: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Teng Ma, Qiang Huang, Chaofeng Wang, Cheng Ren, Yibo Xu, Hua Lin, Kun Zhang, Congming Zhang, Zhao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-025-00828-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open reduction, superior plate (SP) fixation, and autologous cancellous granular bone grafting (ACGBG) are common strategies for treating clavicular midshaft atrophic nonunion (CMAN). We aimed to compare the radiological findings and clinical effects of two autologous cancellous bone grafts (ACBGs) and those of single SP fixation, to treat CMAN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study comprised 62 patients admitted to our hospital with CMAN (ACGBG with single SP fixation between March 2012 and October 2017, 32 patients; autologous cancellous structured bone grafting [ACSBG] with single SP fixation between November 2017 and May 2021, 30 patients). Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores, obtained preoperatively and at final follow-up, were recorded and analyzed. Statistical differences between the ACGBG and ACSBG groups were assessed using Fisher's exact and two-sample independent t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient demographics or the incidence of complications. VAS and DASH scores decreased significantly from the preoperative day to 9 months postoperatively in both groups, but this difference was not statistically significant at final follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, compared with mean VAS and DASH scores in the ACGBG group, the ACSBG group showed lower pain and dysfunction scores (p < 0.05). The mean fracture healing times were 15.2 (range, 12-20) and 18.6 (range, 12-32) weeks in the ACSBG and ACGBG groups, respectively (p = 0.01). One case of plate breakage occurred in the ACGBG group at 5 months postoperatively, with recovery following ACSBG revision with single SP fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACSBG combined with single SP fixation is a promising and effective alternative technique for promoting bone union and postoperative early functional rehabilitation in treating CMAN.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00828-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00828-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:切开复位、上钢板(SP)固定和自体松质颗粒骨移植(ACGBG)是治疗锁骨中轴萎缩性骨不连(CMAN)的常用策略。我们的目的是比较两种自体松质骨移植物(ACBGs)和单一SP固定治疗CMAN的影像学表现和临床效果。方法:回顾性研究2012年3月至2017年10月我院收治的CMAN (ACGBG)单SP固定患者62例,其中32例;自体松质结构骨移植(ACSBG)单SP固定(2017年11月至2021年5月,30例)。记录和分析术前和最终随访时患者手臂、肩部和手部疼痛和残疾的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(DASH)。ACGBG组和ACSBG组之间的统计学差异采用Fisher精确检验和双样本独立t检验进行评估。结果:两组患者人口学特征及并发症发生率均无统计学差异。术前1 ~术后9个月,两组患者VAS、DASH评分均显著下降,但最终随访时差异无统计学意义。然而,在术后3和6个月,与ACGBG组的VAS和DASH平均评分相比,ACSBG组的疼痛和功能障碍评分较低(p)。结论:ACSBG联合单SP固定是促进骨愈合和术后早期功能康复治疗CMAN的一种有希望和有效的替代技术。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing two autologous bone grafting techniques to treat clavicular midshaft atrophic nonunion: a retrospective study.

Background: Open reduction, superior plate (SP) fixation, and autologous cancellous granular bone grafting (ACGBG) are common strategies for treating clavicular midshaft atrophic nonunion (CMAN). We aimed to compare the radiological findings and clinical effects of two autologous cancellous bone grafts (ACBGs) and those of single SP fixation, to treat CMAN.

Methods: This retrospective study comprised 62 patients admitted to our hospital with CMAN (ACGBG with single SP fixation between March 2012 and October 2017, 32 patients; autologous cancellous structured bone grafting [ACSBG] with single SP fixation between November 2017 and May 2021, 30 patients). Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores, obtained preoperatively and at final follow-up, were recorded and analyzed. Statistical differences between the ACGBG and ACSBG groups were assessed using Fisher's exact and two-sample independent t tests.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient demographics or the incidence of complications. VAS and DASH scores decreased significantly from the preoperative day to 9 months postoperatively in both groups, but this difference was not statistically significant at final follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, compared with mean VAS and DASH scores in the ACGBG group, the ACSBG group showed lower pain and dysfunction scores (p < 0.05). The mean fracture healing times were 15.2 (range, 12-20) and 18.6 (range, 12-32) weeks in the ACSBG and ACGBG groups, respectively (p = 0.01). One case of plate breakage occurred in the ACGBG group at 5 months postoperatively, with recovery following ACSBG revision with single SP fixation.

Conclusions: ACSBG combined with single SP fixation is a promising and effective alternative technique for promoting bone union and postoperative early functional rehabilitation in treating CMAN.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信