泛素c端水解酶- l1和胶质纤维酸性蛋白串联脑生物标志物检测在预测CT明显脑损伤中的应用:急诊科的前瞻性评价

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jemima M Curran, Katherine Onions, Jessica Watts, Arnab Rana, Emma Hughes, James Allison, Jamie G Cooper
{"title":"泛素c端水解酶- l1和胶质纤维酸性蛋白串联脑生物标志物检测在预测CT明显脑损伤中的应用:急诊科的前瞻性评价","authors":"Jemima M Curran, Katherine Onions, Jessica Watts, Arnab Rana, Emma Hughes, James Allison, Jamie G Cooper","doi":"10.1177/00045632251326483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and often meet recognized criteria for CT head imaging. Observational studies suggest that use of a tandem ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) brain biomarker test may significantly reduce need for CT scanning in this population, though data on patient flow are lacking.<b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort evaluation of adult ED patients (≥18 years) with features of mTBI who met criteria for CT imaging within 12 hours of head injury had blood drawn for laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP testing. The diagnostic performance for CT-evident brain injury was expressed through the calculation of sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Times from venepuncture to biomarker result availability, and from CT request to result availability were compared.<b>Results:</b> A laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test identified 21 of 89 (24%) patients as low-risk for CT-evident TBI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 76%-100%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI 85%-100%). The median time to biomarker and CT results were 88 minutes and 89 minutes, respectively. However, 68 (76%) of patients with a positive biomarker test would then progress to CT imaging, significantly prolonging ED length of stay, and restricting usefulness in adoption into clinical pathways.<b>Conclusion:</b> Evaluation of a laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test in a UK population with mTBI demonstrates excellent performance for the exclusion of CT-evident brain injury. However, adoption into clinical patient pathways is likely to be limited until the test is available in whole blood at the point-of-care, and evidence of safe rationalization of CT imaging confirmed in randomized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251326483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein tandem brain biomarker test in the prediction of CT evident brain injury: A prospective evaluation in the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Jemima M Curran, Katherine Onions, Jessica Watts, Arnab Rana, Emma Hughes, James Allison, Jamie G Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632251326483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and often meet recognized criteria for CT head imaging. Observational studies suggest that use of a tandem ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) brain biomarker test may significantly reduce need for CT scanning in this population, though data on patient flow are lacking.<b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort evaluation of adult ED patients (≥18 years) with features of mTBI who met criteria for CT imaging within 12 hours of head injury had blood drawn for laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP testing. The diagnostic performance for CT-evident brain injury was expressed through the calculation of sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Times from venepuncture to biomarker result availability, and from CT request to result availability were compared.<b>Results:</b> A laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test identified 21 of 89 (24%) patients as low-risk for CT-evident TBI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 76%-100%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI 85%-100%). The median time to biomarker and CT results were 88 minutes and 89 minutes, respectively. However, 68 (76%) of patients with a positive biomarker test would then progress to CT imaging, significantly prolonging ED length of stay, and restricting usefulness in adoption into clinical pathways.<b>Conclusion:</b> Evaluation of a laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test in a UK population with mTBI demonstrates excellent performance for the exclusion of CT-evident brain injury. However, adoption into clinical patient pathways is likely to be limited until the test is available in whole blood at the point-of-care, and evidence of safe rationalization of CT imaging confirmed in randomized studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632251326483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251326483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251326483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)特征的患者经常出现在急诊科(ED),并且通常符合公认的CT头部成像标准。观察性研究表明,使用串联泛素c端水解酶- l1 (UCH-L1)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)脑生物标志物测试可以显著减少这一人群对CT扫描的需求,尽管缺乏患者流量的数据。在一项针对英国mTBI患者的前瞻性评估中,实验室UCH-L1/GFAP检测确定89例(24%)患者中有21例(24%)为ct明显TBI低风险患者,其敏感性为100% (95% CI 76-100%), NPV为100% (95% CI 85-100%)。从静脉切除获得生物标志物结果的中位时间为88分钟,与从CT请求到报告的时间(89分钟)相似。然而,这68例(76%)生物标志物阳性的患者都需要后续的CT成像,这大大延长了ED的住院时间,使其难以纳入临床途径。在医疗点测量全血UCH-L1/GFAP的平台的可用性可能会在未来规避这些问题,并允许在不影响ED患者工作流程的情况下在这一人群中安全合理地进行CT成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein tandem brain biomarker test in the prediction of CT evident brain injury: A prospective evaluation in the emergency department.

Background: Patients with features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently present to the emergency department (ED) and often meet recognized criteria for CT head imaging. Observational studies suggest that use of a tandem ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) brain biomarker test may significantly reduce need for CT scanning in this population, though data on patient flow are lacking.Methods: A prospective cohort evaluation of adult ED patients (≥18 years) with features of mTBI who met criteria for CT imaging within 12 hours of head injury had blood drawn for laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP testing. The diagnostic performance for CT-evident brain injury was expressed through the calculation of sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Times from venepuncture to biomarker result availability, and from CT request to result availability were compared.Results: A laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test identified 21 of 89 (24%) patients as low-risk for CT-evident TBI with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 76%-100%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI 85%-100%). The median time to biomarker and CT results were 88 minutes and 89 minutes, respectively. However, 68 (76%) of patients with a positive biomarker test would then progress to CT imaging, significantly prolonging ED length of stay, and restricting usefulness in adoption into clinical pathways.Conclusion: Evaluation of a laboratory UCH-L1/GFAP test in a UK population with mTBI demonstrates excellent performance for the exclusion of CT-evident brain injury. However, adoption into clinical patient pathways is likely to be limited until the test is available in whole blood at the point-of-care, and evidence of safe rationalization of CT imaging confirmed in randomized studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信