IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Sang Won Han, Eunsil Oh
{"title":"Aligned, competing, and blurred: Gender and family attitudes in East Asia","authors":"Sang Won Han,&nbsp;Eunsil Oh","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores the complexity of how gender and family attitudes relate to each other in East Asia, paying particular attention to heterogeneity and the impact of cognitive structures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent work on gender and family attitudes across post-industrial societies has shown a rise in the complexity of attitudinal configurations. However, no systematic analysis has been conducted to explore variations in attitudinal configurations and cognitive structures. This study aims to fill this gap.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the 2012 Gender Module of the International Social Survey Programme were used to conduct a relational class analysis to measure relationships and networks among gender and family attitudes in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan (<i>N</i> = 8,007).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Analysis revealed three cognitive structures: aligned, competing, and blurred. The aligned structure represents a cognitively unified belief system. The competing structure identifies beliefs that are in conflict, with a network of attitudes that is partitioned into family versus work. The last group comprises those who cognitively have blurred boundaries across different domains of gender, work, and family. Notably, competing and blurred cognitive structures are characterized by lower life satisfaction and fertility intentions than those with an aligned structure. Further analysis demonstrated that all three groupings exist in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan but vary in prevalence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings shed new light on the complex interplay of gender and family attitudes in East Asia and provide valuable insights into the heterogeneous cognitive structures of attitudes and the consequences of holding unstructured and dissonant attitudinal structures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 2","pages":"676-700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨东亚地区性别与家庭态度之间的复杂关系,尤其关注异质性和认知结构的影响。 研究背景 近期有关后工业社会中性别和家庭态度的研究表明,态度配置的复杂性有所上升。然而,还没有系统性的分析来探讨态度配置和认知结构的差异。本研究旨在填补这一空白。 方法 使用国际社会调查计划 2012 年性别模块的数据进行关系类分析,测量中国、日本、韩国和台湾地区(N = 8,007 人)的性别和家庭态度之间的关系和网络。 结果 分析发现了三种认知结构:一致结构、竞争结构和模糊结构。一致结构代表认知上统一的信念系统。竞争结构则是指存在冲突的信念,其态度网络分为家庭和工作两部分。最后一组是那些在性别、工作和家庭等不同领域认知界限模糊的人。值得注意的是,与认知结构一致的人相比,认知结构相互竞争和模糊的人的生活满意度和生育意愿较低。进一步的分析表明,中国、日本、韩国和台湾都存在这三种组别,但发生率各不相同。 结论 这些研究结果对东亚地区性别与家庭态度的复杂相互作用有了新的认识,并对态度的异质性认知结构以及持有非结构化和不和谐态度结构的后果提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Aligned, competing, and blurred: Gender and family attitudes in East Asia

Aligned, competing, and blurred: Gender and family attitudes in East Asia

Objective

This study explores the complexity of how gender and family attitudes relate to each other in East Asia, paying particular attention to heterogeneity and the impact of cognitive structures.

Background

Recent work on gender and family attitudes across post-industrial societies has shown a rise in the complexity of attitudinal configurations. However, no systematic analysis has been conducted to explore variations in attitudinal configurations and cognitive structures. This study aims to fill this gap.

Method

Data from the 2012 Gender Module of the International Social Survey Programme were used to conduct a relational class analysis to measure relationships and networks among gender and family attitudes in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan (N = 8,007).

Results

Analysis revealed three cognitive structures: aligned, competing, and blurred. The aligned structure represents a cognitively unified belief system. The competing structure identifies beliefs that are in conflict, with a network of attitudes that is partitioned into family versus work. The last group comprises those who cognitively have blurred boundaries across different domains of gender, work, and family. Notably, competing and blurred cognitive structures are characterized by lower life satisfaction and fertility intentions than those with an aligned structure. Further analysis demonstrated that all three groupings exist in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan but vary in prevalence.

Conclusion

The findings shed new light on the complex interplay of gender and family attitudes in East Asia and provide valuable insights into the heterogeneous cognitive structures of attitudes and the consequences of holding unstructured and dissonant attitudinal structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信