IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Thomas Leopold, Marcel Raab, Charlotte Clara Becker, Zafer Buyukkececi, Beyda Çineli
{"title":"Mapping modern kinship networks: First results from the KINMATRIX survey","authors":"Thomas Leopold,&nbsp;Marcel Raab,&nbsp;Charlotte Clara Becker,&nbsp;Zafer Buyukkececi,&nbsp;Beyda Çineli","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study presents initial results from the KINMATRIX survey, a large-scale source of ego-centric network data offering an unprecedented level of scope and detail in mapping family relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research on kinship networks is limited by the scarcity of available data. As a result, key phenomena remain insufficiently understood, including the importance of extended kin, contrasts between kinship lines, and cross-national differences. Notably, extended kin provide a unique “strength in numbers” that can enhance social transmission, integration, and support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from anchor respondents aged 25–35 (<i>N</i> = 11,788 anchors; 239,220 anchor-kin dyads) collected in seven Western countries (Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States). Kinship networks included a large array of nuclear, extended, and complex kin (on average, 20 kin per anchor). We used descriptive methods to examine retrospective, current, and prospective assessments of kin ties across four measures: importance, closeness, contact, and support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We report three main findings: First, extended kin are central to younger adults' lives, representing at least half of the family members they are emotionally close to, regularly contact, and deem important. Second, kinship networks are matrilineally tilted. Maternal kin are emotionally closer, more frequently contacted, considered more important, and more supportive. Third, cross-national comparisons reveal both similarities and notable differences, with the United States and Sweden showing elevated importance of extended and complex kin and Italy exhibiting higher social integration with nuclear and extended kin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Data on kinship networks can significantly advance our understanding of key family phenomena.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 2","pages":"478-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究介绍了 KINMATRIX 调查的初步结果,这是一个以自我为中心的大规模网络数据源,在绘制家庭关系图方面提供了前所未有的范围和细节。 背景 关于亲属关系网络的研究因可用数据稀缺而受到限制。因此,对一些关键现象的了解仍然不够,包括大家族的重要性、亲缘关系之间的对比以及跨国差异。值得注意的是,大家庭提供了一种独特的 "人数优势",可以加强社会传承、融合和支持。 方法 我们分析了在七个西方国家(德国、意大利、荷兰、波兰、瑞典、英国和美国)收集的 25-35 岁锚受访者的数据(N = 11,788 锚;239,220 锚-亲属二元组)。亲属关系网络包括大量核心亲属、扩展亲属和复合亲属(平均每个锚人有 20 个亲属)。我们采用描述性方法,通过重要性、亲密程度、联系和支持这四项指标,对亲属关系的回顾性评估、当前评估和前瞻性评估进行了研究。 结果 我们报告了三个主要发现:首先,远亲是年轻人生活的中心,至少占他们情感亲密、经常联系并认为重要的家庭成员的一半。其次,亲属网络向母系倾斜。母系亲属在情感上更亲近、联系更频繁、被认为更重要、支持性更强。第三,跨国比较显示出相似之处和显著差异,美国和瑞典显示出延伸亲属和复杂亲属的重要性,而意大利则显示出与核心亲属和延伸亲属的社会融合度更高。 结论 有关亲属关系网络的数据可以极大地促进我们对主要家庭现象的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping modern kinship networks: First results from the KINMATRIX survey

Mapping modern kinship networks: First results from the KINMATRIX survey

Objective

This study presents initial results from the KINMATRIX survey, a large-scale source of ego-centric network data offering an unprecedented level of scope and detail in mapping family relationships.

Background

Research on kinship networks is limited by the scarcity of available data. As a result, key phenomena remain insufficiently understood, including the importance of extended kin, contrasts between kinship lines, and cross-national differences. Notably, extended kin provide a unique “strength in numbers” that can enhance social transmission, integration, and support.

Method

We analyzed data from anchor respondents aged 25–35 (N = 11,788 anchors; 239,220 anchor-kin dyads) collected in seven Western countries (Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States). Kinship networks included a large array of nuclear, extended, and complex kin (on average, 20 kin per anchor). We used descriptive methods to examine retrospective, current, and prospective assessments of kin ties across four measures: importance, closeness, contact, and support.

Results

We report three main findings: First, extended kin are central to younger adults' lives, representing at least half of the family members they are emotionally close to, regularly contact, and deem important. Second, kinship networks are matrilineally tilted. Maternal kin are emotionally closer, more frequently contacted, considered more important, and more supportive. Third, cross-national comparisons reveal both similarities and notable differences, with the United States and Sweden showing elevated importance of extended and complex kin and Italy exhibiting higher social integration with nuclear and extended kin.

Conclusion

Data on kinship networks can significantly advance our understanding of key family phenomena.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信