统一数量丰度、生物量和环境DNA之间关系的框架

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Matthew C. Yates, Taylor M. Wilcox, Shannon Kay, Pedro Peres-Neto, Daniel D. Heath
{"title":"统一数量丰度、生物量和环境DNA之间关系的框架","authors":"Matthew C. Yates,&nbsp;Taylor M. Wilcox,&nbsp;Shannon Kay,&nbsp;Pedro Peres-Neto,&nbsp;Daniel D. Heath","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does environmental DNA (eDNA) concentration correlate with numerical abundance (<i>N</i>) or biomass in aquatic organisms? We hypothesize that eDNA can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both. Building on frameworks developed from the Metabolic Theory of Ecology, we derive two equations to adjust eDNA data to simultaneously reflect both <i>N</i> and biomass using population size structure data and allometric scaling coefficients. We also demonstrate that these equations share model parameters, necessitating the joint estimation of regressions between adjusted eDNA, <i>N</i>, and biomass. Furthermore, our framework can be extended to model how other variables (temperature, taxa, diet, trophic level, etc.) might impact relationships between eDNA, <i>N</i>, and biomass in natural ecosystems. We applied our framework to data from two previously published studies correlating eDNA to Brook Trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) <i>N</i> and biomass. In both case studies, point estimates of the scaling coefficient (<i>b</i>) reflected allometric processes (<i>b</i> = 0.51 and 0.37 for Case Study 1 and 2, respectively), with credible intervals indicating that b likely differed from zero (i.e., eDNA scales with <i>N</i>) and one (i.e., eDNA scales with biomass). Directly estimating the value of b improved estimates of <i>N</i> and biomass relative to assuming b equals 0, which particularly affected the capacity to estimate biomass. However, models assuming eDNA production scaled with biomass (i.e., <i>b</i> = 1) were largely similar to estimating <i>b</i>, implying that assuming eDNA scales linearly with biomass might be a sufficient approximation for some systems. Nevertheless, the framework demonstrates that correlating eDNA directly with either <i>N</i> or biomass (as is commonly done in many studies) inherently necessitates an adjustment to infer the other metric if populations exhibit size structure variation. Collectively, we demonstrate that quantitative eDNA data is unlikely to correspond exactly to either population <i>N</i> or biomass but can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental DNA\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C. Yates,&nbsp;Taylor M. Wilcox,&nbsp;Shannon Kay,&nbsp;Pedro Peres-Neto,&nbsp;Daniel D. Heath\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Does environmental DNA (eDNA) concentration correlate with numerical abundance (<i>N</i>) or biomass in aquatic organisms? We hypothesize that eDNA can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both. Building on frameworks developed from the Metabolic Theory of Ecology, we derive two equations to adjust eDNA data to simultaneously reflect both <i>N</i> and biomass using population size structure data and allometric scaling coefficients. We also demonstrate that these equations share model parameters, necessitating the joint estimation of regressions between adjusted eDNA, <i>N</i>, and biomass. Furthermore, our framework can be extended to model how other variables (temperature, taxa, diet, trophic level, etc.) might impact relationships between eDNA, <i>N</i>, and biomass in natural ecosystems. We applied our framework to data from two previously published studies correlating eDNA to Brook Trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) <i>N</i> and biomass. In both case studies, point estimates of the scaling coefficient (<i>b</i>) reflected allometric processes (<i>b</i> = 0.51 and 0.37 for Case Study 1 and 2, respectively), with credible intervals indicating that b likely differed from zero (i.e., eDNA scales with <i>N</i>) and one (i.e., eDNA scales with biomass). Directly estimating the value of b improved estimates of <i>N</i> and biomass relative to assuming b equals 0, which particularly affected the capacity to estimate biomass. However, models assuming eDNA production scaled with biomass (i.e., <i>b</i> = 1) were largely similar to estimating <i>b</i>, implying that assuming eDNA scales linearly with biomass might be a sufficient approximation for some systems. Nevertheless, the framework demonstrates that correlating eDNA directly with either <i>N</i> or biomass (as is commonly done in many studies) inherently necessitates an adjustment to infer the other metric if populations exhibit size structure variation. Collectively, we demonstrate that quantitative eDNA data is unlikely to correspond exactly to either population <i>N</i> or biomass but can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70073\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境DNA (eDNA)浓度是否与水生生物的数值丰度(N)或生物量相关?我们假设eDNA可以调节以同时反映两者。在生态学代谢理论框架的基础上,我们推导了两个方程,利用种群大小结构数据和异速缩放系数来调整eDNA数据,以同时反映N和生物量。我们还证明了这些方程共享模型参数,需要对调整后的eDNA、N和生物量之间的回归进行联合估计。此外,我们的框架可以扩展到其他变量(温度、分类群、饮食、营养水平等)如何影响自然生态系统中eDNA、N和生物量之间的关系。我们将我们的框架应用于之前发表的两项研究的数据,这些研究将eDNA与布鲁克鳟鱼(Salvelinus fontinalis) N和生物量联系起来。在这两个案例研究中,标度系数(b)的点估计值反映了异速生长过程(案例研究1和案例研究2的b分别为0.51和0.37),可信区间表明b可能不同于0(即eDNA尺度与N)和1(即eDNA尺度与生物量)。相对于假设b = 0,直接估算b的值可以改善对N和生物量的估算,这尤其影响了估算生物量的能力。然而,假设eDNA产量与生物量成比例(即b = 1)的模型与估计b的模型在很大程度上相似,这意味着假设eDNA与生物量成线性比例可能对某些系统是足够的近似值。然而,该框架表明,如果种群表现出大小结构变化,eDNA与N或生物量直接相关(正如许多研究中通常做的那样)本质上需要进行调整,以推断其他指标。总的来说,我们证明定量eDNA数据不太可能完全对应于种群N或生物量,但可以调整以同时反映两者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental DNA

A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental DNA

Does environmental DNA (eDNA) concentration correlate with numerical abundance (N) or biomass in aquatic organisms? We hypothesize that eDNA can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both. Building on frameworks developed from the Metabolic Theory of Ecology, we derive two equations to adjust eDNA data to simultaneously reflect both N and biomass using population size structure data and allometric scaling coefficients. We also demonstrate that these equations share model parameters, necessitating the joint estimation of regressions between adjusted eDNA, N, and biomass. Furthermore, our framework can be extended to model how other variables (temperature, taxa, diet, trophic level, etc.) might impact relationships between eDNA, N, and biomass in natural ecosystems. We applied our framework to data from two previously published studies correlating eDNA to Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) N and biomass. In both case studies, point estimates of the scaling coefficient (b) reflected allometric processes (b = 0.51 and 0.37 for Case Study 1 and 2, respectively), with credible intervals indicating that b likely differed from zero (i.e., eDNA scales with N) and one (i.e., eDNA scales with biomass). Directly estimating the value of b improved estimates of N and biomass relative to assuming b equals 0, which particularly affected the capacity to estimate biomass. However, models assuming eDNA production scaled with biomass (i.e., b = 1) were largely similar to estimating b, implying that assuming eDNA scales linearly with biomass might be a sufficient approximation for some systems. Nevertheless, the framework demonstrates that correlating eDNA directly with either N or biomass (as is commonly done in many studies) inherently necessitates an adjustment to infer the other metric if populations exhibit size structure variation. Collectively, we demonstrate that quantitative eDNA data is unlikely to correspond exactly to either population N or biomass but can be adjusted to simultaneously reflect both.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信